8412
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 115, No. 18, 8 November 2001
Guo, Carrington, and Filseth
getically permitted, was found to be a minor process at 193.4
nm in C2F4,7 ͑CFH͒2,8 and C2F3Cl and CH2CClF.9 No evi-
dence was found at all for this reaction in the CF2CH2
dissociation.8 For two of these molecules, photodissociation
has also been studied at 157.6 nm. For both C2F3Cl10 and
CF2CH2,11 C–F bond breaking remains a minor process at
157.6 nm. Thus we anticipate that CN elimination, found to
be a minor process in acrylonitrile at 193.4 nm,4–6 will be so
as well at 157.6 nm.
In this paper we report the first measurements of energy
disposal within the internal degrees of freedom of CN(X)
produced by photodissociation of acrylonitrile at 157.6 nm.
We compare our results with those of Bird and Donaldson12
for the 193.4 nm dissociation.
0, 0 and 0, 2 bands. The magnitudes of the corrections to the
LIF signals were typically less than 10% and not signifi-
cantly dependent on the value of P2 for different bands. The
maximum correction reached 20% for a 60% change in dye
laser energy.
In our experiments, acrylonitrile ͑Aldrich, 99ϩ%͒ vapor
was taken from a sample of liquid held in a reservoir at 0 °C
and flowed slowly through the gas cell. LIF signals were
acquired with a gated integrator, averaged and analyzed as
described below.
III. DATA ANALYSIS
The extraction of population information from spectral
data can be challenging if extensively overlapped features
are prevalent. In some cases, methods based upon a multi-
variate linear regression procedure can yield excellent results
and we have described such an approach for the determina-
tion of CN(A 2⌸) populations from LIF spectra excited in
the CN(B–A) system.14 This approach to LIF spectra ex-
cited in the CN(B–X) system is less successful since the
band consists of fewer branches and two overlapped pairs
instead of 12 as in the CN(B–A) system. Thus in the present
case we have made estimates of population distributions
based on the relative intensities of nonoverlapped lines and
used these estimates to refine the distributions by comparison
with computed spectra. We have employed for this compari-
son the simulation software, LIFBASE, prepared at SRI In-
ternational by Luque and Crosley.15
II. EXPERIMENT
The apparatus and experimental procedure have been de-
scribed recently13 and only an abbreviated description is
given here. Experiments were carried out in a 27 L aluminum
gas cell. Unpolarized photolysis radiation was provided at
157.6 nm by an excimer laser operating on mixtures of F2
and He at 25 Hz. Product CN(X, ,N) populations were de-
v
termined, in a manner similar to that described previously,
from the intensities of fluorescence in the CN(B–X) system
excited by absorption of tunable dye laser radiation in the
same system between 387 and 460 nm. Laser induced fluo-
rescence ͑LIF͒ spectra were scanned in overlapping sections
and joined together with the aid of repetitive scans over se-
lected lines taken at the beginning and end of single sections.
The probe laser beam was passed through a wedge depolar-
izer and crossed the excimer beam direction at right angle.
LIF was collected with a filtered photomultiplier tube on an
axis normal to the plane of the two laser beams. Several
Since CN(X) is found in this experiment in vibrational
levels up to ϭ6, we have acquired the LIF spectra in three
v
scans to achieve separation in the vibrational levels to some
extent. One of these scans we call ͑0/0͒ corresponding to
excitation in the ⌬ ϭ0 bands with detection of fluorescence
v
complete scans of the CN( ,N) product distributions were
recorded at pressures of 5–6 mTorr with probe delay times
of 0.5–1.5 s.
in the same bands. This spectrum consists of the absorption
spectra of the ͑0,0͒ through ͑5,5͒ bands detected in emission
through a 20 nm wide interference filter ͑maxϭ382.5 nm,
FWHM:372.5–392.5 nm͒. A second scan, called ͑0/Ϫ1͒, cor-
v
A number of preliminary experiments were completed
before LIF spectra of the nascent distribution were acquired.
It was found at high excimer laser energies that CN(B) was
produced in the acrylonitrile photolysis. A dependence on the
second power of the excimer energy was established by dis-
persing the CN(B–X) fluorescence through a monochro-
mator and measuring the fluorescence signal while attenuat-
ing the excimer laser beam with fine mesh metal screens of
known transmission. This signal, observed with a second fil-
tered photomultiplier tube, was subsequently employed to
establish the linear dependence of the LIF signal on excimer
laser energy and to correct LIF scans of the CN(X) distribu-
tion for declining excimer laser energy during an experiment.
A small correction to the LIF signals was made to ac-
count for partial transition saturation and for the dependence
of dye laser energy on wavelength as the probe dye laser is
scanned in sections over its gain curve. The dependence of
the LIF signal on probe laser energy was investigated for the
CN(B–X)0,0 and 0,2 bands and the data was fitted with a
saturation function, P1P2E/(1ϩP2E) where E is the dye
laser energy. The saturation parameter P2 is dependent on
the ratio of the Einstein coefficients B/A, and P2 values
were computed for other bands from those measured for the
responds to ⌬ ϭ0 excitation with observation of fluores-
v
cence through
ϭ355.0 nm, FWHM:351.0–360.0 nm͒. This scan excludes
emission from CN(B, ϭ0) permitting more reliable deter-
a
⌬ ϭϪ1 interference filter ͑
v
max
v
mination of CN(X, ϭ1) populations. Finally, a third scan,
v
called ͑Ϫ2/0͒, corresponds to excitation in the ⌬ ϭϪ2 se-
v
quence with fluorescence observed through the same filter
employed for the ͑0/0͒ scans. This combination excludes
contributions from excitation of CN(X, ϭ0,1) and permits
v
more reliable determination of populations of CN(X, у2).
v
Two complete experiments for each of these three scans were
acquired and analyzed both separately and as a merged set.
There is no facility in version 1.5 of LIFBASE for mak-
ing quantitative use of residuals so agreement between ex-
perimental and simulated spectra is judged subjectively. In
addition there is no provision for inclusion of fluorescence
filter specifications so that computed spectra represent detec-
tion of all fluorescence rather than that of single bands as
was the case in the present experiments. Thus to the degree
that different bands in a given sequence differ in their
Franck–Condon factors and/or in their transmission through
the filter, corrections must be made. We make the former
128.42.202.150 On: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 09:02:00