Fig. 2 Dependence of the rate of H2 evolution from an aqueous ethanol
solution on the atomic ratio of Pt to Ru on Y2Ta2O5N2 catalyst under
visible-light irradiation. Catalyst, 0.3 g; ethanol solution (20% v/v), 200 ml;
light source, 300 W Xe lamp (l w 420 nm).
Fig. 3 O2 production from an aqueous AgNO3 solution over Y2Ta2O5N2
catalyst under visible-light irradiation. Catalyst, 0.3 g; La2O3, 0.2 g; 0.01 M
AgNO3 solution, 200 ml; light source, 300 W Xe lamp (l w 420 nm).
YTaO4, where the energy level of the N2p orbital is higher than
that of the O2p orbital, and the predominant population of the
valence band of Y2Ta2O5N2 by a hybrid orbital between N2p and
O2p.
0
peak attributable to the metallic Ag deposited on the Y2Ta2O5N2,
further confirming that the photocatalyst is essentially stable.
In summary, Y2Ta2O5N2 catalyst synthesized by nitriding
YTaO4 under ammonia flow has a small optical bandgap energy
of 2.2 eV and functions as an efficient photocatalyst for water
oxidation to O2 in the presence of a sacrificial electron acceptor
(Ag1). This catalyst also exhibits activity for water reduction to H2
in the presence of a sacrificial electron donor (ethanol) and Pt or Ru
as a co-catalyst. This activity is significantly enhanced by the
presence of both Pt and Ru.
Figure 2 correlates the rate of H2 evolution over Y2Ta2O5N2
with the ratio of photodeposited Pt to Ru in the reaction solutions.
In the initial stage of the reaction, H2PtCl6 and RuCl3 were reduced
to Pt and Ru, which serve as H2-evolution promoters. It was
confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) that
0
H2PtCl6 and RuCl3 in the solution were deposited as metallic Pt
0
and Ru particles, with no oxidized noble metals present. The rate
of H2 evolution was examined after reaction for 1 h. Although Pt
generally functions as an excellent promoter for photocatalytic
water reduction to H2, 0.15 wt% Pt/Y2Ta2O5N2 exhibited very low
H2-evolution activity (37 mmol h21 g21). In contrast, H2 reduction
was remarkably enhanced by the addition of 0.25 wt% Ru to
Y2Ta2O5N2, reaching 170 mmol h21 g21. The activity of H2 evolu-
tion was further increased by co-depositing both Pt and Ru on
the Y2Ta2O5N2 catalyst, increasing with the amount of Pt to a
maximum of 833 mmol h21 g21 over a catalyst of Y2Ta2O5N2 with
0.15 wt% Pt and 0.25 wt% Ru. This rate is 22 times greater than that
for 0.15 wt% Pt/Y2Ta2O5N2. Deposition of more than 0.15 wt% Pt
lowered the activity from this peak.
This work was financially supported by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 90210036, 20273070),
the National Key Basic Research and Development Program
(Grant No. 2003CB214500), the Core Research for Evolutional
Science and Technology (CREST) Program of the Japan Science
and Technology Corporation (JST), and the Innovation Program
of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. DICP K 2002 F1).
The authors also gratefully acknowledge the China Petroleum &
Chemical Corporation (Grant No. X503019) for financial support.
Notes and references
The remarkably high activity for photocatalytic water reduction
(H2 evolution) achieved by the presence of both Pt and Ru as noble
metal co-catalysts is attributable to facile electron migration from
the conduction band of Y2Ta2O5N2 to the Pt–Ru co-catalysts,
thereby retarding the possibility of electrons recombining with
holes in the valence band and improving the charge separation
efficiency. This promoting effect is much greater when both Pt and
Ru are present as co-catalysts compared to one or the other alone.
Figure 3 shows the results for photocatalytic O2 evolution from
0.01 M AgNO3 solution over Y2Ta2O5N2. No reaction took place
in the absence of light. Upon irradiation, O2 was produced at an
initial rate of 140 mmol h21. With prolonged irradiation, the rate of
O2 evolution decreased, due to a decrease in the Ag1 concentration
1 T. Takata, Y. Furumi, K. Shinohara, A. Tanaka, M. Hara, J. N. Kondo
and K. Domen, Chem. Mater., 1997, 9, 1063.
2 H. Kato, K. Asakura and A. Kudo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 3082.
3 M. Machida, S. Murakami and T. Kijima, J. Phys. Chem., 2001, 105,
3289.
4 Z. Zou, J. Ye, K. Syama and H. Arakawa, Nature, 2001, 414, 625.
5 Z. Lei, W. You, M. Liu, G. Zhou, T. Takata, M. Hara, K. Domen and
C. Li, Chem. Commun., 2003, 2142.
6 A. Ishikawa, T. Takata, J. N. Kondo, M. Hara, H. Kobayashi and
K. Domen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 13547.
7 M. Anpo, Catal. Surv. Jpn., 1997, 1, 169.
8 D. C. Cronemeyer, Phys. Rev., 1959, 113, 1222.
9 R. Asahi, T. Morikawa, T. Ohwaki, K. Aoki and Y. Taga, Science,
2001, 293, 269.
10 T. Ohno, T. Mitsui and M. Matsumura, Chem. Lett., 2003, 32, 364.
11 S. Sakthivel and H. Kisch, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 4908.
12 G. Hitoki, T. Takata, J. N. Kondo, M. Hara, H. Kobayashi and
K. Domen, Chem. Commun., 2002, 1698.
13 A. Kasahara, K. Nukumizu, G. Hitoki, T. Takata, J. N. Kondo,
M. Hara, H. Kobayashi and K. Domen, J. Phys. Chem., 2002, 106, 6750.
14 M. Hara, J. Nunoshige, T. Takata, J. N. Kondo and K. Domen, Chem.
Commun., 2003, 3000.
15 F. Pors, R. Marchand and Y. Laurent, J. Solid State Chem., 1993,
107, 39.
0
in solution and the deposition of reduced metallic Ag on the
catalyst surface, shielding the catalyst from irradiation. During the
first 10 h of reaction, Ag1 ions in the solution (2000 mmol) were
almost entirely consumed to produce 470 mmol of O2. Only a small
amount of N2 (v 2% of the evolved O2) was detected in the early
stage of the reaction (1–3 h), demonstrating that photodegradation
of the catalyst is negligible in this reaction. No noticeable diffe-
rences were observed in the X-ray diffraction patterns of the catalyst
before and after reaction, except for the emergence of a diffraction
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 2 1 9 2 – 2 1 9 3
2 1 9 3