10.1002/chem.201705655
Chemistry - A European Journal
FULL PAPER
washing cycles and once pH of the water keeps almost constant, the
electrodes are sonicated 10-15 minutes in isopropanol or ethanol and they
are dried with a heat pistol.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Spanish Ministerio de Economia y
Competitividad (MINECO) (CTQ2016-76061-P and CTQ2015-
64561-R) European Research Council (StG 239910), and
Generalitat de Catalunya (2014 SGR 862 and ICREA Academia
award to MC an J. LL-F.). J.Ll.-F. thanks the CELLEX foundation
for the starting career program for financial support. Financial
support from the MINECO through the “Maria de Maeztu”
Program for Units of Excellence in R&D (MDM-2014-0377) is also
acknowledged. We are very grateful to Dr. Sergio Diaz-Tendero
for many fruitful discussions. We acknowledge the generous
Photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS): Spectra were obtained with a VG
Escalab 200R spectrometer equipped with a hemispherical electron
analyzer (pass energy of 50 eV) and a Mg Kα (hν = 1254.6 eV, 1 eV =
1.6302 x 10-19 J) X-ray source, powered at 120 W. The kinetic energies of
photoelectrons were measured using a hemispherical electron analyzer
working in the constant pass energy mode. The background pressure in
the analysis chamber was kept below 6 x 10-9 mbar during data acquisition.
The XPS data signals were taken in increments of 0.1 eV with dwell times
of 50 ms. Binding energies were calibrated relative to the C 1s peak at
284.8 eV. High-resolution spectra envelopes were obtained by curve fitting
synthetic peak components using the software XPS peak. The raw data
were used with no preliminary smoothing. Symmetric Gaussian-Lorentzian
product functions were used to approximate the line shapes of the fitting
components. Morphological characterizations of the carbon fiber was
carried out using a scanning electron microscope (Philips XL30 S-FEG).
Measurements of the fiber diameter were done using ImageJ software.
Identification of the chemical elements that contains the carbon fiber have
been measured in a Total Reflection X-Ray Fluorescence (TXRF) 8030c-
FEI Spectrometer. A Mo Kα X-ray source was used as energy source at
50kV and 0.6mA.
Electrochemistry: Electrochemical experiments were performed under
an argon atmosphere at room temperature in CH3CN o water solutions.
Tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (Bu4NPF6) or sodium
perchlorate (NaClO4) were used as supporting electrolytes.
Measurements were carried out by using an Ivium CompaqStat
potentiostat interfaced with a computer. A standard three-electrode
electrochemical cell was used. Potentials were referred to an Ag/AgCl,
Et4NBr 0.4 M reference electrode in ethylene glycol, and measured
potentials were calibrated using an internal Fc/Fc+ standard. The working
electrode was a carbon fiber brush. The auxiliary electrode was a pristine
carbon fiber brush.
allocation of computer time at the Centro de Computacion
́
Cientifica at the Universidad Autonoma de Madrid (CCC-UAM).
́
́
Keywords: electrocatalysis • hydrogen evolution • hydride
transfer • bioinspired materials
References
[1]
Biol. Cell, Garland, New York & London, 3rd Edn., 2002.
[2] J. M. Berg, J. L. Tymoczko, L. Stryer, Biochemistry, W. H. Freeman, New
York, 5th Edn, 2002.
B. Alberts, D. Bray, J. Lewis, M. Raff, K. Roberts, J. D. Watson, in Mol.
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
H. Adolfsson, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3340–3342.
J. Rosen, Chemtracts 2005, 18, 65–71.
S.-L. You, Chem. – Asian J. 2007, 2, 820–827.
S. G. Ouellet, A. M. Walji, D. W. C. Macmillan, Acc. Chem. Res. 2007,
40, 1327–1339.
[7]
[8]
[9]
S. J. Connon, Org Biomol Chem 2007, 5, 3407–3417.
Gas Chromatography: The evolved amount of H2 during the
electrocatalytic reaction was monitored by gas chromatography,
C. Wang, X. Wu, J. Xiao, Chem. – Asian J. 2008, 3, 1750–1770.
M. Rueping, E. Sugiono, F. R. Schoepke, Synlett 2010, 2010, 852–865.
approximately each
4 minutes by injecting samples of the intern
[10] M. Rueping, J. Dufour, F. R. Schoepke, Green Chem 2011, 13, 1084–
1105.
atmosphere to an Agilent 490 micro gas chromatograph equipped with a
thermal conductivity detector and a 1/8” Molesieve 100/120 column,
calibrated with different H2/He/CO/CH4 mixtures of known composition.
For gas chromatography quantification of alcohol benzaldehyde, 0,1 mL of
the solution is mixed with 0,2 mL of methyl-naphthalene as standard and
0,7 mL chloroform. A calibrate of benzyl alcohol was carried out in the
range of (1·10-6-1·10-5 moles) using the same amount of the standard,
enabling the quantification of the benzyl alcohol amount. The analysis was
performed in an Agilent 7820A GC system equipped with a mass
spectroscopy detector (5977B MSD).
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: Quantification of benzylic alcohol
generated was analyzed during the chrono-amperommetry experiment by
extracting samples of 1 mL of reaction mixture. CH3CN solvent was
removed by vacuum. Then, 1 mL of chloroform was added, which dissolve
the organic compounds but not the inorganic salt. Finally, the solution is
filtrated (0,45 µm pore size) and analyzed by 1H-NMR and gas
chromatography. Spectra were acquired on a Bruker 300 spectrometer
running at 300 MHz for 1H. Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm relative
to residual solvent signal (CDCl3: 7.26 ppm).
[11] D. G. Nocera, Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 10001–10017.
[12] M. G. Walter, E. L. Warren, J. R. McKone, S. W. Boettcher, Q. Mi, E. A.
Santori, N. S. Lewis, Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6446–6473.
[13] M. Zeng, Y. Li, J Mater Chem A 2015, 3, 14942–14962.
[14] Y. Zheng, Y. Jiao, M. Jaroniec, S. Z. Qiao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015,
54, 52–65.
[15] W. Sheng, Z. Zhuang, M. Gao, J. Zheng, J. G. Chen, Y. Yan, Nat
Commun 2015, 6, 5848.
[16] Y. Shao-Horn, H. A. Gasteiger, W. Sheng, J Electrochem Soc 2010, 157,
B1529–B1536.
[17] X. Zou, Y. Zhang, Chem Soc Rev 2015, 44, 5148–5180.
[18] Y. Hou, B. L. Abrams, P. C. K. Vesborg, M. E. Björketun, K. Herbst, L.
Bech, A. M. Setti, C. D. Damsgaard, T. Pedersen, O. Hansen, et al., Nat Mater
2011, 10, 434–438.
[19] K. S. Novoselov, V. I. Fal[prime]ko, L. Colombo, P. R. Gellert, M. G.
Schwab, K. Kim, Nature 2012, 490, 192–200.
[20] K. R. Paton, E. Varrla, C. Backes, R. J. Smith, U. Khan, A. O’Neill, C.
Boland, M. Lotya, O. M. Istrate, P. King, et al., Nat Mater 2014, 13, 624–630.
[21] M.-R. Azani, A. Hassanpour, V. Carcelén, C. Gibaja, D. Granados, R.
Mas-Ballesté, F. Zamora, Appl. Mater. Today 2016, 2, 17–23.
[22] S. Navalón, J. R. Herance, M. Álvaro, H. García, Chem. – Eur. J. 2017,
Accepted Manuscript.
Scanning
Electron
Microscopy
(SEM):
Morphological
characterizations of the carbon fiber was carried out using a scanning
electron microscope (Philips XL30 S-FEG). Measurements of the fiber
diameter were done using ImageJ software.
Total Reflection X-Ray Fluorescence (TXRF): Identification of the
chemical elements that contains the carbon fiber have been measured in
a TXRF 8030c-FEI Spectrometer. A Mo Kα X-ray source was used as
energy source at 50kV and 0.6mA.
[23] Y. Xu, M. Kraft, R. Xu, Chem Soc Rev 2016, 45, 3039–3052.
[24] W. Zhou, J. Jia, J. Lu, L. Yang, D. Hou, G. Li, S. Chen, Nano Energy
2016, 28, 29–43.
[25] J. Hu, C. Zhang, X. Meng, H. Lin, C. Hu, X. Long, S. Yang, J Mater Chem
A 2017, 5, 5995–6012.
[26] V. R. Stamenkovic, D. Strmcnik, P. P. Lopes, N. M. Markovic, Nat Mater
2017, 16, 57–69.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.