Job/Unit: A11244
/KAP1
Date: 05-01-12 14:47:08
Pages: 6
2D Magnetic Frames by the Microwave-Assisted Chemistry Approach
The Al
2 3
O layer was deposited by ALD (Savanah 100 system by
Cambridge Nanotech). Reactants for alumina growth, i.e. trimeth- [1] a) M. H. Kim, J. Y. Choi, H. K. Choi, S. M. Yoon, O. O. Park,
ylaluminum (TMA) and water were kept at room temperature. The
PS monolayer was placed in the ALD chamber at 100 °C, under a
N flow of 20 sccm and exposed to continuous TMA and water
2
pulses (0.15 s each). Every TMA/water cycle was followed by a
waiting time of 8 s, to ensure the complete reaction of the species
on the exposed surface of the sample. Hundred cycles were per-
formed as the rate of alumina growth is about 0.1 nm per cycle,
which yields an alumina layer of 10 nm. Non-attached nanopar-
ticles were also separated from the reaction media. Briefly, the reac-
tion solution was mixed with excess EtOH (in a volume ratio of
D. K. Yi, S. J. Choi, H. J. Shin, Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 457–461;
b) Y. Wang, A. S. Angelatos, F. Caruso, Chem. Mater. 2008,
20, 848–858.
[
2] a) Y. Xia,Y. Lu, K. Kamada, B. Gates, Y. Yin in The Chemistry
of Nanostructured Materials (Ed.: P. Yang), Worl Scientific,
Singapore, 2003, pp. 69–101; b) M. Agrawal, S. Gupta, M.
Stamm, Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 615–627; c) R. J. White, R.
Luque, V. L. Budarin, J. H. Clark, D. J. Macquarrie, Chem.
Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 481–494.
[
3] a) J. Hu, M. Chen, X. Fang, L. Wu, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40,
5
472–5491; b) J. M. Campelo, D. Luna, R. Luque, J. M. Mari-
1:3) and surfactant (20 μL, oleic acid for organic dispersion) fol-
nas, A. A. Romero, ChemSusChem 2009, 2, 18–45.
lowed by centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 30 min. The supernatant
was discharged, and the precipitate redispersed in hexane (2 mL)
containing oleic acid (10 μL) followed by centrifugation at
[4] a) L. Perreux, A. Loupy, Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9199–9223; b)
V. Polshettiwar, M. N. Nadagouda, R. S. Varma, Aust. J.
Chem. 2009, 62,16–26.
[5] a) M. Tsuji, S. Hikino, M. Matsunaga, Y. Sano, T. Hashizume,
H. Kawazumi, Mater. Lett. 2010, 64, 1793–1797; b) T. Yamau-
chi, Y. Tsukahara, T. Sakata, H. Mori, T. Yanagida, Nanoscale
6000 rpm for 15 min. No precipitate was separated, and the stable
dark brown solution was used for further analysis.
Material Characterization: TEM micrographs were obtained with
a JEOL JEM-1210 electron microscope, operating at 120 kV. The
selected area diffraction patterns were captured by using a JEOL
JEM-2011, operating at 200 kV. The samples were prepared by de-
positing a drop of diluted nanoparticle dispersion in hexane onto
a TEM grid and by letting the solvent evaporate. The mean dia-
meter and polydispersity of each system were determined by fitting
a particle size histogram of over 200 counts measured from TEM
images to a Gaussian distribution by using the imageJ software.
Template SEM images were acquired by using a Quanta FEI 200F
microscope in low vacuum mode with a cone LOW kV P.L.A. with
a 500-μm aperture. The working conditions were: acceleration volt-
age 5 kV, electron beam spot 2, pressure 40 Pa, and distance 5–
2
010, 2, 515–523; c) L. Xiao, H. Shen, R. von Hagen, J. Pan,
L. Belkoura, S. Mathur, T. Kawaic, Y. Wada, Chem. Commun.
010, 46, 6509–6511; d) P. Nekooi, M. Akbari, M. K. Amini,
2
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 6392–6398; e) I. Bilecka, M.
Kubli, E. Amstad, M. Niederberger, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol.
2011, 57, 313–322; f) C. Gonzales-Arellano, A. M. Balu, R.
Luque, D. J. Macquarrie, Green Chem. 2010, 12, 1995–2002.
6] a) Z. Ai, K. Deng, Q. Wan, L. Zhang, S. Lee, J. Phys. Chem.
C 2010, 114, 6237–6242; b) X. Hu, J. C. Yu, J. Gong, J. Phys.
Chem. C 2007, 111, 11180–11185; c) X. Hu, J. C. Yu, Chem.
Mater. 2008, 20, 6743–6749; d) S. Q. Chen, Y. Wang, J. Mater.
Chem. 2010, 20, 9735–9739; e) C. Gonzales-Arellano, R.
Luque, D. J. Macquarrie, Chem. Commun. 2009, 30, 4581–
[
4
583.
6
mm. For the EDX analysis, 10–15 kV, a spot of 2.5–3, and a
[
7] a) G. A. Tompsett, W. C. Conner, K. S. Yngvesson, ChemPhys-
Chem 2006, 7, 296–319; b) C. Yacou, A. Ayral, A. Giroir-
Fendler, M.-L. Fontaine, A. Julbe, Microporous Mesoporous
Mater. 2009, 126, 222–227.
8] O. Pascu, J. M. Caicedo, M. Lopez-Garcia, V. Canalejas, A.
Blanco, C. Lopez, J. Fontcuberta, A. Roig, G. Herranz, Nano-
scale 2011, 3, 4811–4816.
9] J. Rieger, J. Therm. Anal. 1996, 46, 965–972.
10] K. Y. Suh, H. Yoon, H. H. Lee, A. Khademhosseini, R.
Langer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 2643–2645.
11] O. Pascu, E. Carenza, M. Gich, G. Herranz, A. Roig, submit-
ted.
12] S. Gündüz, S. Dinçer, Polymer 1980, 21, 1041–1046.
13] a) X. Gao, R. Liu, Y. Huang, O. Starykov, W. Oppermann,
Macromolecules 2008, 41, 2554–2560; b) H. Wu, W. Wang, H.
Yang, Z. Su, Macromolecules 2007, 40, 4244–4249; c) E. M.
Woo, Y. S. Sun, M. L. Lee, Polymer 1999, 40,4425–4429.
Received: November 7, 2011
distance of 10 mm were used. Magnetic characterization was per-
formed with a quantum interference device (SQUID) magnetome-
ter (Quantum Design MPMS5XL). The sample was prepared by
using a gelatin capsule filled with compacted cotton impregnated
with 150 μL of a hexane dispersion of nanoparticles, which gave a
mass of 1.2 mg (magnetic material without surfactant).
[
[
[
Acknowledgments
[
We thank A. Blanco (ICMM-CSIC) for providing the polystyrene
template. We acknowledge funding from the Spanish Government
[
[
(CONSOLIDER Nanoselect-CSD2007-00041, MAT2009-08024,
MAT2009-06885-E, MAT2011-29269-C03, and RyC contract of
M. Gich), the Generalitat de Catalunya (2009SGR-203,
2009SGR376, and FI. of O. Pascu), and the European Commission
(Marie Curie Actions, PCIG09-GA-2011–294168).
Published Online:
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 0000, 0–0
© 0000 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjic.org
5