Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2006, 339, 559–563
Novel Aldose Reductase Inhibitors
563
[15, 16], (4-pentyloxyphenyl)acetic acid 4bc [15, 17], (4-hexyloxy-
phenyl)acetic acid 4bd [15], (4-octyloxyphenyl)acetic acid 4be
[15, 16], (4-iso-butoxyphenyl)acetic acid 4bb [17], (4-nonyloxyphe-
nyl)acetic acid 4bf [16]. However, with the exception of 4bd [18]
no spectroscopic data are given.
the oxidation of NADPH catalyzed by ALR 2. The assay was per-
formed at 378C in a reaction mixture containing 0.25 M potas-
sium phosphate buffer pH 6.8, 0.38 M ammonium sulfate,
0.11 mM NADPH, and 4.7 mM D,L-glyceraldehyde as substrate in
a final volume of 1.5 mL. All inhibitors were dissolved in DMSO.
The final concentration of DMSO in the reaction mixture was
1%. To correct for the nonenzymatic oxidation of NADPH, the
rate of NADPH oxidation in the presence of all the components
except the substrate was subtracted from each experimental
rate. Each dose-effect curve was generated using at least three
concentrations of inhibitor causing an inhibition between 20
and 80%. Each concentration was tested in duplicate and IC50
values as well as the 95% confidence limits (95% CL) were
obtained by using CalcuSyn software [20] for dose effect analysis.
General procedure for O-alkylation of 1a and 1b
Powdered potassium carbonate (4 equiv.) was added to a solution
of the appropriate hydroxy compound 1a or 1b (2 equiv.,
5.6 mmol) in 10 mL of dry N,N-dimethylformamide under atmo-
sphere of nitrogen. After stirring for 30 min at room tempera-
ture, one equivalent of the appropriate alkyliodide was added
and the mixture was stirred until TLC indicated no further con-
version (room temperature to 508C). Then, the mixture was
poured into cold water, acidified with 2N HCl and the product
was extracted exhaustively with diethyl ether or dichloro-
methane, respectively. The organic layer was washed succes-
sively with 2N NaOH, water and brine, dried over anhydrous
sodium sulfate, and evaporated to dryness. The residue thus
obtained was purified to give 3aa, 3ad, 3ba, and 3bd (Table 2) or
directly used for further conversion (3ab and 3bb).
References
[1] P. Zimmet, K. G. M. M. Alberti, J. Shaw, Nature 2001, 414,
782–787.
[2] S. Wild, G. Roglic, A. Green, R. Sicree, H. King, Diabetes
Care 2004, 27, 1047–1053.
General procedure for O-alkylation of 2
[3] M. Brownlee, Nature 2001, 414, 813–820.
In analogy to the procedure described above, O-alkylation was
performed by reaction of 2a (1 equiv., 2.0 mmol) with the appro-
priate alkyliodide (2.2 equiv.) to give the corresponding alkyl 3-
alkyloxyphenylacetates which were directly used for further
conversion.
[4] L. Costantino, G. Rastelli, M. C. Gamberini, D. Barlocco,
Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents 2000, 10, 1245–1262.
[5] D. Rakowitz, B. Hennig, M. Nagano, S. Steger, et al., Arch.
Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2005, 338, 411–418.
[6] D. Rakowitz, P. Muigg, N. Schrꢀder, B. Matuszczak, Arch.
Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2005, 338, 419–426.
General procedure for the synthesis of the alkoxyphenyl-
acetic acids of type 4a and 4b
[7] D. Rakowitz, A. Gmeiner, N. Schrꢀder, B. Matuszczak,
A solution of the appropriate ester in ethanol (5 mL/mmol) was
treated with 2N NaOH (1.2 equivalents) and stirred overnight at
room temperature. The solvent was then evaporated, the residue
treated with a small amount of water and the pH adjusted to 5
with 2N HCl. The mixture thus obtained was extracted with
diethyl ether or ethyl acetate, respectively; the organic layer was
washed successively with water and brine, dried over anhydrous
sodium sulfate, and evaporated to dryness under reduced pres-
sure. The residue thus obtained was purified as described in
Table 3.
Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2006, 27, 188–193.
[8] D. Rakowitz, H. Angerer, B. Matuszczak, Arch. Pharm.
Chem. Life Sci., in press.
[9] E. I. Howard, R. Sanishvili, R. E. Cachau, A. Mitschler, et
al., Proteins 2004, 55, 792–804.
[10] T. Kinoshita, H. Miyake, T. Fujii, S. Takakura, T. Goto,
Acta Cryst. 2002, D58, 622–626.
[11] A. Podjarny, R. E. Cachau, T. Schneider, M. Van Zandt, A.
Joachimiak, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2004, 61, 763–773.
[12] A. Urzhumtsev, F. Tete-Favier, A. Mitschler, J. Barbanton,
Aldose reductase inhibitory assay
et al., Structure 1997, 5, 601–612.
NADPH, D,L-glyceraldehyde and dithiothreitol (DTT) were pur-
chased from Sigma Chemical Co. DEAE-cellulose (DE-52) was
obtained from Whatman. Sorbinil was a gift from Prof. Dr. Luca
Costantino, University of Modena (Italy) and was used as stan-
dard [IC50 = 0.9 (l0.3) lM]. All other chemicals were commercial
samples of good grade. Calf lenses for the isolation of ALR 2 were
obtained locally from freshly slaughtered animals. The enzyme
was purified by a chromatographic procedure as previously
described [19]. Briefly, ALR 2 was released by carving the capsule
and the frozen lenses were suspended in potassium phosphate
buffer pH 7 containing 5 mM DTT and stirred in an ice-cold bath
for 2 h. The suspension was centrifuged at 4000 rpm at 48C for
30 min and the supernatant was subjected to ion exchange chro-
matography on DE-52. Enzyme activity was assayed spectropho-
tometrically on a Cecil Super Aurius CE 3041 spectrophotometer
(Cecil Instruments, Cambridge, England) by measuring the
decrease in absorption of NADPH at 340 nm which accompanies
[13] D. K. Wilson, I. Tarle, J. M. Petrash, F. A. Quiocho, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 9847–9851.
[14] S. Miyamoto, Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents 2002, 12, 621–631.
[15] D. Coates, J. W. Gray, J. Chem. Soc. (Perkin Trans. II) 1976, 7,
863–868.
[16] H. Schubert, H. Zaschke, J. Prakt. Chem. 1970, 312, 494–
506.
[17] E. Profft, R. Drux, J. Prakt. Chem. 1956, 3, 274–277.
[18] A. R. Katritzky, D. Toader, L. Xie, Synthesis 1996, 12,
1425–1427.
[19] L. Costantino, G. Rastelli, K. Vescovini, G. Cignarella, et
al., J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 4396–4405.
[20] T.-C. Chou, M. P. Hayball, 1996 CalcuSyn software version
1.1.1., Biosoft, Cambridge, UK.
i 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim