Existence of the Elusive Ammonia Oxide Molecule and Its Radical Cation
FULL PAPER
D. Luckhaus, J. Chem. Phys. 1997,
[
2c]
Phys. 1997, 101, 339. Ϫ
by collisions with xenon (80% T); unreacted ions were removed
from the beam. Subsequent reionization of the neutrals was
achieved by collision with oxygen (80% T), and the resulting cat-
ionic fragments were recorded by scanning B(2). For NR/CA
experiments, the survivor ions of the NR experiment were mass-
selected with B(2), collided with helium (80% T), and the produced
fragments were recorded by scanning E(2). In order to improve the
signal-to-noise ratio, 5Ϫ100 spectra were accumulated and online-
processed with the AMD-Intectra data system.
2d]
06, 8409. Ϫ [ M. N. Hughes, K. Shrimanker, Inorg. Chim.
1
Acta 1976, 18, 69.
[3] [3a]
C. A. Schalley, G. Hornung, D. Schröder, H. Schwarz, J.
Chem. Soc. Rev. 1998, 27, 91. Ϫ [ N. Goldberg, H. Schwarz,
Acc. Chem. Res. 1994, 27, 347. Ϫ [ F. Turecek, Org. Mass
Spectrom. 1992, 27, 1087.
4]
3b]
3c]
[
Two problems closely related to [H
HOOH/H OO and the HNNH/H NN tautomerism have been
investigated by mass spectrometry: For [H ,O ], see: D.
3
,N,O] concerning the
2
2
2
2
Schröder, C. A. Schalley, N. Goldberg, J. Hru sˇ a´ k, H. Schwarz,
Chem. Eur. J. 1996, 2, 1235; for [H ,N ], see: N. Goldberg, M.
2 2
ND
2
OD was obtained by repeated recrystallization of pure
OH in CH CH OD. Pure NH OH was deliberated from
OH ·HCl with NaOEt. was produced by deuterolysis
with D O. Aqueous HN was produced by dropping
concentrated sulfuric acid into a solution of NaN in water. The
concentration of HN solutions was about 1Ϫ5%. H NOSiMe
NOSiMe Ph, and H NOSitBuPh were synthesized by treating
hydroxylamine with the corresponding chlorosilanes ClSiR in di-
chloromethane.[ All chemicals were introduced in the ion source
C. Holthausen, J. Hru sˇ a´ k, W. Koch, H. Schwarz, Chem. Ber.
1993, 126, 2753.
5]
NH
NH
2
2
3
2
2
[
[17]
S. G. Lias, J. F. Liebmann, J. L. Holmes, R. D. Levin, W. G.
ND
3
Mallard, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17, 695.
3
of Mg N
2
2
3
[6]
ϩ
2
For a combined MS and theoretical study of [H ,N,O] ions,
[6a]
3
see:
D. Schröder, F. Grandinetti, J. Hru sˇ a´ k, H. Schwarz, J.
[6b]
3
,
Phys. Chem 1992, 96, 4841. Ϫ
F. Grandinetti, J. Hru sˇ a´ k, D.
[6c]
3
2
Schröder, H. Schwarz, J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 2100. Ϫ
C.
H
2
2
2
2
Lifshitz, P. J. A. Ruttink, G. Schaftenaar, J. K. Terlouw, Mass
Spectrom. Rapid Commun. 1987, 1, 61.
3
18]
[7]
Our calculated dipole moments agree fairly well with the exper-
imentally determined values of 0.59 D for hydroxylamine (taken
from Selected Values of Electric Moments for Molecules in the
Gas Phase, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of
[19]
via the metal-free teflon/glass inlet system.
Ab initio quantum-mechanical calculations were performed with
IBM RS/6000 workstations and Pentium PCs using Gaussian
Standards, 1967) and of 5.0 D for Me NO (taken from: N.
3
[20]
Hacket, R. J. W. Fevre, J. Chem. Soc. 1961, 1612).
94.
For trimethylsilyl-substituted species, geometries were fully
[8]
a
The discrepancy between our calculated value for IE (2) ϭ 9.15
optimized at the HF/6-31G* level, and single-point energies were
calculated at the MP2/6-31G* level. For all other species, full ge-
ometry optimizations and frequency calculations were carried out
at the MP2/6-311G(d,p) level. The effect of using larger basis sets
and a better correlation treatment was examined by performing
single-point MP2/6-311ϩG(3df,2p) and CCSD(T)/6-311G(d,p) cal-
culations at the previously optimized geometries. These results were
eV and the literature values (9.6 eV[ and 10.0 eV ) derived
from photoelectron spectra is quite high. We ascribe it to the
absence of the 0-0 transition in the experiment, yielding an ov-
9a]
[9b]
erestimation of IE . The calculated value for IE (2) ϭ 10.72 eV
a
v
[9a] [9b]
and the experimental values (10.6 eV
much better.
and 10.56 eV ) agree
[9] [9a]
I. A. Koppel, U. M. Mölder, R. J. Pikver, Org. React. 1983,
20, 45. Ϫ [ R. E. Kutina, G. L. Goodman, J. Berkowitz, J.
Chem. Phys. 1982, 77, 1664.
10] [10a]
9b]
[21]
further used to determine extrapolated
CCSD(T)/6-
[
J. N. Harvey, M. Aschi, H. Schwarz, W. Koch, Theor. Chem.
3
11ϩG(3df,2p) energies in an approach similar to the well-known
Acc. 1998, 99, 95. Ϫ [
10b]
D. Schröder, C. Heinemann, H.
[23]
G2 method.
All data in Tables 1 and 2 include the unscaled
Schwarz, J. N. Harvey, S. Dua, S. J. Blanskby, J. H. Bowie,
MP2/6-311G** zero-point energy corrections. The relative energy
of O was determined by adding the experimental value for the P
Ǟ D excitation (1.967 eV)
Analogously, the relative energy of N was determined by adding
Chem. Eur. J., in press.
1
3
[11] [11a]
J. Hru sˇ a´ k, H. Friedrichs, H. Schwarz, H. Razafinjanahary,
11b]
H. Chermette, J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 100. Ϫ [
I. Demachy, P. C. Hilberty, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 247, 126.
[12] [12a]
S. Humbel,
1
[24]
3
to the calculated total energy of O.
2
M. J. Polce, S. Beranova, M. J. Nold, C. Wesdemiotis, J.
4
2
[24]
the experimental value for the S Ǟ D excitation (2.383 eV)
to
the calculated total energy of N. The minimum energy crossing
point (MECP) of H NO was located by employing a recently devel-
[12b]
Mass Spectrom. 1996, 31, 1073. Ϫ
J. L. Holmes, A. A.
4
[12c]
Mommers, Org. Mass Spectrom. 1984, 19, 460. Ϫ
P. C. Bur-
gers, J. L. Holmes, A. A. Mommers, J. E. Szulejko, J. K. Ter-
3
oped hybrid method[10]
louw, Org. Mass Spectrom. 1984, 19, 442.
which calculates energy gradients at the
[13]
Attempts to protonate F
3
CCONHOH and H
2
NOCOCF
3
lead
MP2/6-311G(d,p) level and energies of stationary points at the
CCSD(T)/6-311G(d,p) level. The geometries of both spin states
were adjusted until the energy difference between them was smaller
to loss of HF instead of the desired loss of neutral H
3
NO.
[14]
Whereas protonation with H was not feasible, use of isobutane
2
as CI gas gave the same results as with methane.
[15]
Ϫ1
The heats of reaction were determined by substracting the pro-
than 0.06 kcal mol
.
Ϫ1
ton affinity of methane (132 kcal mol ) from the calculated
proton affinity for N- and O-protonation of 9. The calculated
total energies including zero point corrections are Ϫ538.8831
ϩ
hartree for H
2 3 3 3
NOSiMe , Ϫ539.4069 hartree for H NOSiMe
ϩ
Ƞ
and Ϫ539.2033 hartree for H
3
NOHSiMe .
Dedicated to Professor Dr. Ernst Schmitz, Berlin, on the oc-
2
[
16] [16a]
C. A. Schalley, D. Schröder, H. Schwarz, Int. J. Mass Spec-
casion of his 70th birthday.
trom. Ion Processes 1996, 153, 173. Ϫ [
16b]
R. Srinivas, D. Sülzle,
[1] [1a]
B. Kallies, R. Mitzner, J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 2959. Ϫ
1b]
[
W. Koch, C. H. DePuy, H. Schwarz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
T. P. Cunningham, D. L. Cooper, J. Gerrat, P. B. Karadakov,
113, 5970. Ϫ [
16c]
R. Srinivas, D. Sülzle, T. Weiske, H. Schwarz,
M. Raimondi, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1996, 60, 393. Ϫ [1c] R.
Int J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1991, 107, 368.
R. Steudel, P. W. Schenk in Handbuch der präparativen anorga-
nischen Chemie (Ed.: G. Brauer), F. Enke Verlag, Stuttgart,
1975, p. 464.
18]
Ponec, M. Krack, K. Jug, Theor. Chim. Acta 1996, 93, 165. Ϫ
[1d]
[17]
N. N. Kharabaev, V. V. Rachkovskii, A. D. Garnovkii, Zh.
Obshch. Khim. 1995, 65, 1650 (Chem. Abstr. 1996, 125,
1e]
51522x). Ϫ [ R. D. Bach, A. L. Owensby, C. Gonzales, H.
1
[
B. Schlegel, J. J. W. McDouall, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
J. C. Bottaro, C. D. Clifford, A. Dodge, Synth. Commun. 1985,
15, 1333.
[19]
6
001. Ϫ [ S. M. Bachrach, J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 1016. Ϫ
Y.-Z. Han, D.-Z. Zhu, C.-D. Zhao, Chin. J. Chem. 1990, 5,
05. Ϫ [ J. A. Pople, K. Raghavachari, M. J. Frisch, J. S.
1f]
[1g]
C. A. Schalley, R. Wesendrup, D. Schröder, T. Weiske, H,
Schwarz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7711.
20]
1h]
4
[
Binkley, P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6389.
M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, P. M. W. Gill, B. G.
Johnson, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, T. Keith, G. A. Peters-
son, J. A. Montgomery, K. Raghavachari, M. A. Al-Laham, V.
G. Zakrzewski, J. V. Ortiz, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, B. B.
Stefanov, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, C. Y. Peng, P. Y.
Ayala, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, E. S. Replogle, R.
Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, J. S. Binkley, D. J. Defrees,
[1i]
Ϫ
F. Grein, J. L. Lawlor, Theor. Chim. Acta 1983, 63, 161.
1j]
Ϫ [ H. Wallmeier, W. Kutzelnigg, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979,
1k]
01, 2804. Ϫ [ C. Trindle, D. D. Shillady, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1
1
973, 95, 703.
[2] [2a]
D. Luckhaus, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 346.
2b]
Ϫ [ B. Kuhn, O. V. Boyarkin, T. R. Rizzo, Ber. Bunsenges.
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 1529Ϫ1538
1537