Thermal Cis-Trans Isomerization of 1,3-Diphenyltriazene
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 65, No. 18, 2000 5743
and the second step corresponds to the thermal cis-to-
trans isomerization catalyzed by general acids or general
bases.
analogous to the acid-catalyzed enol-ketonization mech-
anism22 and to the acid-catalyzed double-bond rearrange-
ment of alkenes.23
A yk1z B acid or8 trans-DP T
(7)
(12)
k-1
base
It is well-known that rotation around the nitrogen-
nitrogen single bond of triazenes has a relatively high
free energy barrier, which is ascribed to the partial
double bond character that results from 1,3-dipolar
contributions (eq 8).15-21 Hence, cis-DP T is proposed to
exist as a pair of rotamers (eq 9) which are expected to
undergo cis-to-trans isomerization at different rates as
a result of stereoelectronic factors. In fact, based on the
1,3-hydrogen shift mechanisms shown in Scheme 1
rotamer B is predicted to isomerize more rapidly than
rotamer A.
The general base-catalyzed mechanism, on the other
hand, is interpreted as represented by eq 13 and involves
rate-determining base-promoted ionization of the amino
nitrogen of rotamer B to give a resonance-stabilized
anion, which then combines with a proton at the position
that gives the thermodynamically more stable trans
triazene. This mechanism resembles the base-catalyzed
enolization process22 as well as the base-catalyzed double-
bond rearrangement of alkenes.23
(8)
(9)
(13)
As already mentioned, two well-distinguishable pro-
cesses are observed at pH < 10. The faster process,
independent of pH and buffer concentration, is ascribed
to the interconversion of cis rotamers (i.e., eq 9), and the
corresponding observed rate constant kfobs is given by eq
10. The second process detected, catalyzed by general
acids or general bases, is ascribed to the thermal cis-to-
trans isomerization and the corresponding observed rate
The “uncatalyzed” process (i.e., c2 in eq 6) would
correspond to solvent water molecules acting as proton
donors (eq 12) or as basic proton acceptors (eq 13).
Evidently, prototropic rearrangements of the type shown
in eqs 12 and 13 do not lead to a change in the nitrogen-
nitrogen double bond configuration when applied to
rotamer A.
constant ks is given by eq 11, where K1 ) k1/k-1, and
obs
kH O, kacid, and kbase represent the uncatalyzed and acid/
2
base catalytic rate coefficients, respectively.
At high pH, the interconversion of rotamers becomes
rate-controlling, and only one process is detected. The fact
that the rate constants observed with NaOH buffer are
identical to the kfobs values determined at pH < 10 would
indicate that k-1 is indeed significantly smaller than k1
(i.e., eq 10 simplifies to kfobs ) k1) and K1 ) k1/k-1 . 1.
This observation is consistent with the relative stability
predicted for this pair of rotamers (i.e., A less stable than
B). Thus, the factor K1/(1 + K1) in eq 11 is for practical
purposes unity, and the coefficients c1 to c3 in eq 6 would
kfobs ) k1 + k-1
(10)
K1
ks
)
(kH O [acid] +
+
k
kbase[base])
∑
∑
obs
acid
2
1 + K1
(11)
No evidence of concerted acid/base-catalysis, as might be
expected from mechanism (b) in Scheme 1, was obtained
under the experimental conditions of this work. The
general acid-catalyzed mechanism is interpreted as
shown in eq 12, and involves rate-determining proton
transfer to the nitrogen-nitrogen double bond of rotamer
B to give a resonance-stabilized cation, which then loses
a proton from the position that gives the thermodynami-
cally more stable trans-triazene. This mechanism is
correspond, respectively, to kH , kH O, and kHO- in eq 11.
+
2
In fact, the catalytic rate coefficients thus ascribed to H+
and HO- are consistent with diffusion-controlled proto-
nation rate constants.24
To the best of our knowledge, no energy barrier for
hindered rotation around the nitrogen-nitrogen single
bond in disubstituted triazenes has been determined so
far. Nonetheless, one would anticipate a higher free
energy of activation for the cis isomer relative to the trans
form due to steric interactions. Based on the application
of the Eyring equation25 to k1, a value of 3.3 × 105 s-1 (at
21 °C) for this rate constant would correspond to a free
(15) Marullo, N. P.; Mayfield, C. B.; Wagener, E. H. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 1968, 90, 510.
(16) Akhtar, M. H.; McDaniel, R. S.; Feser, M.; Oehlschlager, A. C.
Tetrahedron 1968, 24, 3899.
(17) Lunazzi, L.; Cerioni, G.; Foresti, E.; Macciantelli, D. J . Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1978, 686.
(18) Sieh, D.; Wilbur, D. J .; Michejda, C. J . J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1980,
102, 3883.
(19) Golding, B. T.; Kemp, T. J .; Narayanaswamy, R.; Waters, B.
W. J . Chem. Res., Synop. 1984, 130.
(20) Lippert, Th.; Wokaun, A.; Dauth, J .; Nuyken, O. Magn. Reson.
Chem. 1992, 30, 1178.
(21) Panitz, J .-C.; Lippert, Th.; Stebani, J .; Nuyken, O.; Wokaun,
A. J . Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 5246.
(22) Toullec, J . Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1982, 18, 1.
(23) Mackenzie, K. in The Chemistry of Alkenes; Patai, S., Ed.; J ohn
Wiley & Sons: London, 1964; Vol. 1, Chapter 7.
(24) Eigen, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1964, 3, 1.
(25) Lowry, T. H.; Richardson, K. S. Mechanisms and Theory in
Organic Chemistry; Harper & Row: New York, 1987; p 209.