flavonoids, namely, (+)-tephrorins A (1) and B (2) and (+)-
tephrosone (3).8
The relative stereochemistry of compound 1 in the pairs
H-2′′/H-3′′ and H-3′′/H-4′′ was established as cis by their
coupling constants and from a 1D NOE experiment. In the
1H NMR spectrum of 1, a doublet of doublets (J ) 9.4, 5.7
Hz) at δH 4.16 (H-3′′), a doublet (J ) 5.7 Hz) at δH 5.74
(H-2′′), and a doublet (J ) 9.4 Hz) at δH 5.63 (H-4′′) were
observed as an ABX system. In the 1D NOE experiment,
irradiation at OCH3-7 (δH 3.93) gave enhancements of H-2′′
and H-6, whereas irradiation at H-3′′ (δH 4.16) gave an
enhancement of H-2′′.
The absolute configuration of the stereogenic centers in 1
was determined using Mosher ester methodology.11,12 Com-
pound 1 was treated with (R)- and (S)-(-)-R-methoxy-R-
(trifluoromethyl)phenylacetyl chloride to obtain the mono-
(S)- (1s) and mono-(R)-ester (1r) C-2′′ analogues.11 The
negative values (∆δS-R) obtained for the methyls in C-5′′
and the positive difference for H-3′′ (Table 2) showed that
the absolute stereochemistry of the chiral center at C-2′′ was
S. Hence, the absolute stereochemistry for C-3′′ and C-4′′
was deduced as R and S, respectively, and C-2 is assigned
as S based on biogenetic analogy.9 Thus, (+)-tephrorin A
(1) was assigned as (2S)-8-[(2S,3R,4S)-4-(acetyloxy)tetrahy-
dro-2-hydroxy-5,5-dimethyl-3-furanyl]-2,3-dihydro-7-meth-
oxy-2-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one.
The positive-ion HRFABMS of compound 2 showed a
molecular ion peak at m/z 485.1957 indicating a molecular
formula of C30H28O6. Hydroxyl (νmax 3422 cm-1) and gem-
dimethyl groups (νmax 1365-1261 cm-1; δC 27.1 and 26.6;
The molecular formula of compound 1 was determined
to be C24H26O7 by positive-ion HRFABMS. Comparison of
its 1H and 13C NMR data with the previously reported known
compound, (+)-purpurin,4 indicated that 1 was a flavanone
in which ring B was unsubstituted.4,9
1
δH 1.24) were observed. The H and 13C NMR spectra of
compound 2 (Table 1) were quite similar to those of 1, except
for the absence of acetate and methoxyl moieties in 2, and
additional signals appeared for a pair of methylene protons
at δH 4.87 and 4.66 (H-2′′). Moreover, additional signals at
δH 6.24 (d, J ) 16.0 Hz, 1H), δH 7.45 (d, J ) 16.0 Hz, 1H),
and δH 7.36-7.46 (m, 5H) supported the presence of a trans-
cinnamic acid group. The location of this cinnamic group at
the C-4′′ position was confirmed by HMBC NMR spectral
observations, with a cross-peak observed between H-4′′ and
166.3 (C-1′′′), and additional correlations were observed as
summarized in Table 2. The relative stereochemistry of the
pair H-3′′/H-4′′ was established as cis from the H-4′′ coupling
constant (δ 5.10, J ) 6.3 Hz, Table 1). To determine the
absolute configuration of the stereogenic centers in com-
pound 2 using the Mosher ester methodology, a hydrolysis
reaction was considered necessary. Treatment of compound
2 under mild alkaline conditions13 afforded a semisynthetic
novel chalcone (2a)13 and cinnamic acid, which is consistent
Hydroxyl (IR, νmax 3426 cm-1), acetate (δC 170.8 and 21.3;
δH 1.96), methoxyl (δH 3.93 s), and gem-dimethyl (νmax
1368-1236 cm-1; δC 27.6 and 24.3; δH 1.08 and 1.37)
1
functionalities were present. The H and 13C NMR data for
1 are shown in Table 1. The remaining portion of the
molecule of 1 was established as consisting of one furan
ring, by spectral data comparison with (+)-tepurindiol.10 This
inference was supported by a HMBC experiment in which
correlations were observed for the resonances at δH 5.63 (H-
4′′) with the signals of δC 113.5 (C-8), 170.8 (OAc-4′′), 81.8
(C-5′′), 27.6 and 24.3 (Me2-5′′), and 47.9 (C-3′′). Additional
HMBC correlations observed are summarized in Table 1.
(8) Physical and spectroscopic data. For 1: yellowish oil; [R]20 +26°
D
(c 0.5, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ꢀ) 239 (4.2), 281 (4.2), 314 (3.8)
nm; IR νmax (film) 3426, 2974, 2931, 1736, 1680, 1596, 1435, 1368, 1273,
1236, 1094 cm-1; FABMS m/z (rel int. %) [M + 1]+ 427 (100), 349 (95),
305 (27), 245 (99), 217 (32), 163 (21), 131 (27); HRFABMS (positive-ion
mode) m/z [M + H]+ 427.1759 (calcd for C24H27O7, 427.1749). For 2:
(11) Preparation of (S)- and (R)-MTPA ester derivatives of compounds
1, 2a (see ref 13), and 3. To a solution of 1, 2a, or 3 (1.5 mg in 0.5 mL of
CHCl3) were added sequentially pyridine (100 µL), 4-(dimethylamino)-
pyridine (0.5 mg), and (R)-(-)R-methoxy-R-(trifluoromethyl)phenylacetyl
chloride (10 mg). Each mixture was heated at 50 °C for 4 h under N2 and
then passed through a disposable pipet (0.6 × 5 cm) packed with silica gel
and eluted with 5 mL of CHCl3. The solvent was removed in vacuo, to
obtain the mono-S-Mosher ester 1s and residues from 2a and 3. These
residues were subjected to preparative TLC to give the purified mono-S-
Mosher ester 3s or the purified di-S-Mosher 2as, respectively. Treatment
of 1, 2a, or 3 (1.5 mg with (S)-(+)R-methoxy-R-(trifluoromethyl)-
phenylacetyl chloride as described above yielded the mono-R-Mosher esters
1r or 2ar and the di-R-Mosher 3r, respectively (1H NMR data, Table 2).12
(12) Ohtani, I.; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, Y.; Kakisawa, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1991, 113, 4092.
yellowish oil; [R]20 +28° (c 0.6, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ꢀ) 220
D
(4.7), 243 (4.5), 280 (4.7) nm; IR νmax (film) 3422, 2983, 1710, 1681, 1632,
1604, 1449, 1365, 1334, 1305, 1261, 1167, 1097, 1063 cm-1; FABMS m/z
(rel int. %): [M + H]+ 485 (37), 337 (10), 265 (39), 186 (67), 161 (60),
131 (100); HRFABMS (positive-ion mode) m/z [M + H]+ 485.1957 (calcd
for C30H29O6, 485.1956). For 3: yellow needles, mp 164 °C; [R]20 +26°
D
(c 0.23, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ꢀ) 207 (4.1), 229 (3.8), 339 (4.0)
nm; IR νmax (film) 3438, 2982, 2932, 1639, 1598, 1566, 1485, 1440, 1356,
1305, 1243, 1089 cm-1; EIMS m/z (rel int. %) [M]+ 352 (100), 334 (89),
291 (67), 230 (64), 208 (95), 131 (80), 103 (75); HREIMS m/z [M]+
352.1305 (calcd for C21H20O5, 352.1306).
(9) Venkata Rao, E.; Ranga Raju, N. Phytochemistry 1984, 23, 2339.
(10) Pelter, A.; Ward, R. S.; Venkata Rao, E.; Ranga Raju, N. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1981, 2491.
516
Org. Lett., Vol. 2, No. 4, 2000