Heterogeneous catalysts are easy to store and handle,
usually are not moisture sensitive, and are easy to separate
and recycle.13 Despite some progress in selective hydro-
genationofindoles toindolinesbyheterogeneouscatalysis,
the available examples are mostly limited to N-protected
indoles.14 The only available report, to the best of our
knowledge, for the hydrogenation of unprotected indole
by catalytic heterogeneous hydrogenation using hydrogen
gas requires very harsh conditions such as hydrogen
pressure of 150 bar and temperature of 227 °C giving
moderate yield.15
Scheme 1. Synthetic Strategy for the Catalytic Heterogeneous
Hydrogenation of Indoles in Water
Under acidic conditions, indole can be protonated at the
C-3 position generating an iminium ion with disrupted
aromaticity.16 This iminium ion could be efficiently hydro-
genated by homogeneous catalytic hydrogenation to
obtain asymmetric indolines using the Pd(OCOCF3)2
catalyst.17 The method appeared tobe efficient; however, it
was limited to 2-substituted indoles that are less prone
to polymerization. Thus, while the application of a coacid
is a reasonable idea, it also raises further problems. As
indole is a highly activated aromatic compound, evenweak
electrophiles initiate polymerization that results in signifi-
cant amount of byproducts.18 The other problem is over-
hydrogenation, mainly to octahydroindole.
The topic has undoubtedly attracted significant atten-
tion due to the importance of the indoline moiety that can
be found in a number of naturally occurring, biologically
active, and pharmaceutically important compounds.19
Aside from the above-discussed hydrogenations,10À12,14,15,17
indolines can be synthesized by direct ring closure through
amination reactions.20
Continuing our efforts toward developing sustainable
organic transformations, herein we report a robust meth-
odology for highly regioselective, Brønsted acid-induced
heterogeneous catalytic hydrogenation of unprotected in-
doles (Scheme 1). The reaction is catalyzed by the inexpen-
sive and commercially available Pt/C catalyst and occurs
under mild conditions such as moderate hydrogen pres-
sure, at room temperature, generally requires short reac-
tiontimes, and mostimportantly utilizeswater asa solvent.
Hydrogenation of indole was selected as a model reac-
tion. The reaction was carried out in ethanol using a Pt/C
catalyst and hydrogen gas. The reaction revealed sig-
nificant selectivity issues such as over hydrogenation to
octahydroindole and polymerization. As our goal was to
develop a green reduction to produce indolines from
unprotected indoles, we decided to further explore this
reaction. We adopted the use of the acid additive even
though that method had failed for unprotected indoles,
since protonation appears to be a reasonable strategy to
disrupt the aromatic system of indole. In order to deter-
mine optimum conditions, a detailed investigation of the
effect of various experimental variables was undertaken.
The results are presented in Table 1.
When carried out without an acid additive, the reaction
yielded the product in traces (entry 1). Using 1 equiv of
trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), however, a substantial amount
of the desired product was observed with octahydroindole
and polymerized byproducts. When carried out in hexane,
the reaction resulted in 61% conversion and 13% selectiv-
ity for the desired product. A similar phenomenon was
observed in toluene, although the selectivity (38%) was
higher than in hexane. The conversion and selectivity
increased in ethanol (62% conversion, 77% selectivity)
and methanol (66% conversion, 76% selectivity). Thus, it
was concluded that the selectivity of product increased
with increasing nucleophilicity of the solvent (entries 2À5).
It appears that the decreasing nucleophilicity of the medi-
um increases the acidity of the system, thus promoting
polymerization.
Therefore, in order to minimize the polymerization, it
was envisioned that further increasing the nucleophilicity
of the medium would alleviate the acidity of the Brønsted
acid, thereby minimizing the possibility of polymerization.
One obvious choice to increase solvent nucleophilicity
was the selection of water as a solvent. When the reaction
was carried out in aqueous medium, polymerization was
completely hindered and only indoline and indole were
observed (entry 7). Then, it was decided to test different
Brønsted acid additives. When camphorsulfonic acid
(CSA) and p-toluenesulfonic acid (p-TSA) were used as
additives (entries 8 and 9), complete conversion was
observed and the selectivity of indoline increased substan-
tially with octahydroindole being the only byproduct.
It appears that there is an acidity optimum for the reaction.
The selectivity decreased when a weaker acid (formic acid)
(13) (a) Horvath, I., Ed. Encyclopedia of Catalysis; Wiley: New York,
€ €
2003. (b) Kulkarni, A.; Torok, B. Curr. Org. Synth. 2011, 8, 187.
(14) (a) Gilchrist, T. L.; Graham, K. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 791. (b)
Chandrasekhar, S.; Basu, D.; Reddy, C. R. Synthesis 2007, 1509.
(15) Shaw, J. E.; Stapp, P. R. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1987, 24, 1477.
(16) (a) Chen, C. B.; Wang, X. F.; Cao, Y. J.; Cheng, H. G.; Xiao,
W. J. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3532. (b) Gilchrist, T. L. Heterocyclic
Chemistry, 3rd ed.; Pearson: Essex, 1997; p 240.
(17) (a) Wang, D. S.; Chen, Q. A.; Li, W.; Yu, C. B.; Zhou, Y. G.;
Zhang, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8909. (b) Wang, D. S.; Tang, J.;
Zhou, Y. G.; Chen, M. W.; Yu, C. B.; Duan, Y.; Jiang, G. F. Chem. Sci.
2011, 2, 803.
(18) Ishii, H.; Murakami, K.; Sakurada, E.; Hosoya, K.; Murakami,
Y. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1988, 2377.
(19) (a) Boger, D. L.; Boyce, C. W.; Garbaccio, R. M; Goldberg, J. A.
Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 787. (b) Dounay, Z. A. B.; Overman, L. E.;
Wrobleski, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10186. (c) Natesh, R.;
Schwager, S. L. U.; Evans, H. R.; Sturrock, E. D.; Acharya, K. R.
Biochemistry 2004, 43, 8718. (d) Gruenfeld, N.; Stanton, J. L.; Yuan,
A. M.; Ebetino, F. H.; Browne, J. J.; Gude, C.; Huebner, C. F. J. Med.
Chem. 1983, 26, 1277.
(20) (a) Anas, S.; Kagan, H. B. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2009, 20,
2193. (b) Liu, D.; Zhao, G.; Xiang, L. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 3975. (c)
Viswanathan, R.; Prabhakaran, E. N.; Plotkin, M. A.; Johnston, J. N.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 163.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 19, 2011
5125