1386
Lindsey et al.
JID 2000;182 (November)
Bayley or McCarthy tests. Weight growth failure and cognitive
decline are part of the composite clinical end points used in PACTG
trials and have similar definitions to those used in ongoing trials.
Statistical methods. Analysis of variance, adjusting for study,
was used to compare baseline, week 24, and changes from baseline
to week 24 marker levels, by age group [24]. To assess the prognostic
value of the markers, proportional hazards models [25] were used
to evaluate associations between marker levels and time from the
week 24 HIV-1 RNA measurement to each clinical end point. HIV-
1 RNA levels and CD4 cell counts were analyzed as continuous
variables on the base 10 logarithmic (log10) scale because this gave
good satisfaction of the assumptions required for the proportional
hazards models. All models were stratified by treatment and study.
This allows the hazard for the outcome to be different for each
study and treatment, but assumes that the association between
outcome and differences in marker levels at baseline or week 24 is
the same across studies. Initial exploratory models were run to see
whether sex, race/ethnicity, or prior treatment influenced the as-
sociations of the markers with the risk of any of the clinical out-
comes. None were found. Results were illustrated by categorizing
HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4 cell counts. Tests for interaction were
used to evaluate whether any associations varied between the dif-
ferent treatments used in the studies. Comparisons of differences
in likelihoods from nested proportional hazards models were used
to assess the relative strength of the association between the 2 CD4
measures and the clinical end points. Follow-up for survival was
censored at the time of study closure or at loss to follow-up. Follow-
up for weight growth failure and cognitive decline was censored at
the time of the last weight or neuropsychologic test score mea-
surement, respectively.
current highly active antiretroviral combinations and may be
useful in countries with no or limited access to protease inhib-
itors. Our results provide important information concerning the
association between treatment-mediated virologic and immu-
nologic marker changes and disease progression in children,
how these associations vary with age, and how they might differ
from results in HIV-1–infected adults. Our findings may be
useful in designing future clinical trials and for the management
of HIV-infected infants and children.
Methods
Studies and evaluations. Studies eligible for inclusion in the
meta-analysis (PACTG 152 [7], PACTG 239 [13], PACTG 240 [14],
PACTG 245 [15], and PACTG 300 [16]) were randomized clinical
trials of NRTIs and the nonnucleoside RTI (NNRTI) drug nevi-
rapine, conducted by the PACTG. All studies had у24 weeks of
follow-up and HIV-1 RNA measurements in at least some children
before the start of therapy and after 24 weeks of study. Lymphocyte
subsets were measured at baseline and at 24 weeks. Weights were
measured every 4 weeks, and cognitive test scores were recorded
at age-appropriate intervals (every 24 weeks in children !30 months
old and at least every year in older children).
The focus of the analysis was on baseline and week 24 marker
values. The baseline value was the marker measurement closest to
and within 30 days before the start of study treatment. Because of
the variation in clinic visits in different studies, the week 24 mea-
surement was defined as the value closest to week 24 within a
window of time between 16 and 32 weeks after the start of treat-
ment. Only children with HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4 cell counts
at both baseline and week 24 were included in the analysis. Children
also had to have started у1 new agent to which they had never
been previously exposed. If a subject participated in 11 of the 5
studies, data from the first enrollment were used. Althoughdifferent
assays for quantifying HIV-1 RNA levels were used, the same assay
was used for all measurements within each study; thus, stratifying
the analyses by study controlled for this source of variation. Values
below the limit of quantification of an assay were replaced by the
limit. Only 3% of values were below the limit, so this practice had
minimal effect on the results.
Outcome measurements. Because the definition of disease pro-
gression varied between studies, 3 end points with objective defi-
nitions were used. The first was death occurring 124 weeks after
the initiation of study antiretroviral therapy. Weight growth failure,
which could only occur 132 weeks after initiation of treatment,
was defined as the third of 3 consecutive 6-month weight growth
velocities less than the third percentile for age and sex [17], with
weight at the third time point less than the 10th percentile for age
and sex. Cognitive decline, which could occur 124 weeks after
baseline, was defined as a decline in scaled score 130 points within
the Bayley I [18] or II [19] tests; a decline in scaled score 130 points
from a Bayley I or II to any other test; a decline in scaled score
115 points from any previous McCarthy [20], Wechsler preschool
and primary scale of intelligence [21], Wechsler intelligence scale
for children, third edition [22], or Wechsler intelligence scale for
children, revised [23]; or no increase in raw score from the previ-
ously administered test of the same type for 112 weeks for the
Results
Patient population. Five studies were included in the anal-
ysis. Children started treatment between August 1991 (PACTG
152) and June 1997 (PACTG 239 and 300); follow-up was com-
pleted between August 1995 (PACTG 152) and September 1997
(PACTG 239). A total of 2081 children started treatment on
у1 study, but only 1089 are included in this analysis: 150 did
not receive a new antiretroviral, 166 had !24 weeks of follow-
up, and 676 had incomplete baseline or week 24 virologic or
immunologic data. Three hundred eleven of the 676 subjects
were enrolled in older studies, in which RNA testing was done
only on a subset of subjects. There were no statistically signif-
icant differences between the study population and those not
included in the analysis in the distributions of sex, race/ethnic-
ity, age, CD4 cell count, or source of infection. There was a
slightly higher proportion of treatment-naive subjects in the
analysis subset (73% vs. 67%), which was a function of the
eligibility criteria requiring у1 new antiretroviral treatment.
Table 1 shows the treatments evaluated in the 5 studies and
baseline characteristics of the 1089 infants and children. All
studies used either monotherapy (47% of patients) or combi-
nation therapy with NRTIs. Two treatment arms of PACTG
245 included the NNRTI nevirapine in combination with 1 or
2 NRTIs. Among the 1089 children, 50% were boys and 55%