Synthesis and photophysical properties of some dithienylbenzo[c]thiophene derivatives

Article abstract of DOI:10.3987/COM-14-13145

The synthesis of a new fullerene - dithienylbenzo[c]thiophene (DTBT) - fullerene triad has been reported. The synthetic scheme provides the synthesis of DTBT unit, a Sonogashira reaction to introduce two acetylenic groups and the coupling with fullerene.

Full text of DOI:10.3987/COM-14-13145

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
313
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015, pp. 313 - 331. © 2015 The Japan Institute of Heterocyclic Chemistry
Received, 5th December, 2014, Accepted, 19th January, 2015, Published online, 20th January, 2015
DOI: 10.3987/COM-14-13145
SYNTHESIS AND PHOTOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOME
DITHIENYLBENZO[c]THIOPHENE DERIVATIVES
Maurizio D'Auria, * Ambra Guarnaccio, Rocco Racioppi,a Antonio
a
b
Santagata, and Roberto Teghila
b
a) Dipartimento di Scienze, Università della Basilicata, Viale dell'Ateneo Lucano
10, 85100 Potenza, Italy
b) CNR, Istituto di Struttura della Materia, U.O.S. Potenza, Zona Industriale, 85100
Tito Scalo, Potenza, Italy
Abstract – The synthesis of a new fullerene - dithienylbenzo[c]thiophene (DTBT)
-
fullerene triad has been reported. The synthetic scheme provides the synthesis of
DTBT unit, a Sonogashira reaction to introduce two acetylenic groups and the
coupling with fullerene. The product showed an absorption at 485 nm and a
fluorescence band at 575 nm. Treatment of 5-(3-(5-ethynyl-2-thienyl)benzo-
[
c]-1-thienyl)thiophene-2-carbaldehyde with LHDMS gave a dimeric product that
showed an absorption at 475 nm and a fluorescence band at 595 nm. Furthermore,
-(3-(2-thienyl)benzo[c]-1-thienyl)thiophene-2-carbaldehyde was treated with
5
hydrazine to give the corresponding adduct that showed an absorption at 480 nm
and a fluorescence band at 605 nm.
INTRODUCTION
Past years have shown a rapid development of researches devoted to the synthesis of new heterocyclic
compounds to be used for optoelectronic applications. The main applications for these new semiconductor
materials are organic thin film transistors (OTFTs), light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), photovoltaic cells,
sensors, and radio frequency identification (RF-ID) tags. The use of organic materials can allow to bypass
some expensive processes necessary for silicon-based materials, such as lithography and vacuum
deposition steps.
1
Several semiconductors have been synthesized and they belonged to different classes of compounds. A
2
significant part of these studies has been performed on thiophene derivatives. In this class of compounds
we focused our attention on benzo[c]thiophene derivatives. The first example of a fused thiophene-based
3
material was reported by Wudl in 1984. Poly(isothianaphthene) (PITN) was synthesized by

314
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
electrochemical polymerization of benzo[c]thiophene. Both theoretical and experimental investigations4-6
showed that fused benzene in benzo[c]thiophene increases the quinoid character of the electronic ground
state, causing a band gap of ~ 1.0 eV, lower than that of polythiophene (2.0 eV).7,8 Alkyl and alkoxy
substituted PITNs were also developed.9-11 Since 1992 the synthesis and the electrochemical behavior of
1
,3-dithienylbenzo[c]thiophene have been reported.12-14 In addition, Cava and coworkers have outlined
detailed synthetic studies of 1,3-dithienylbenzo[c]thiophene analogues.15 Bäuerle and coworkers
a series of end-capped benzo[c]thiophene-based oligomers that showed a significant red shift in their
1
6
absorption spectra. Alkyl substituted terthiophenes incorporating a central benzo[c]thiophene unit were
17
successfully dimerized to form hexathiophenes. Oxidative coupling of noncapped terthiophenes yielded
1
5
higher oligomers. Application of these materials as donor and fullerene PCBM as acceptor in bulk
heterojunction solar cells was also investigated.18
Recently, we reported a communication on the synthesis of a new dithienylbenzo[c]thiophene
In this paper, we want to report all the results we obtained in this field.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The main building block in our approach was 1,3-dithienylisothianaphthene (DTBT). It was prepared in
3
7% overall yield (Scheme 1).20 2-Thienylmagnesium bromide (2 mol equivalents) reacted with
ortho-phthalaldehyde (1) to give the secondary diol 2 with 76% yield. The treatment of the diol in
2
1
of pyridinium chlorochromate (PCC) led to the diketone 3 with 49% of yield.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1,3-dithienylisothianaphthene
The 1,4-diketone was transformed in the corresponding thiophene through treatment with Lawesson’s
reagent (LR) to afford desired 1,3-bis(2-thienyl)benzo[c]thiophene (4).

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
315
1
,3-Bis(5-bromo-2-thienyl)benzo[c]thiophene (5) was synthesized according to the standard bromination
of 4 with N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) as reported by Mitschke and Bäuerle (Scheme 2).16 Although, as
2
2
it was reported by Kisselev and Thelakkat, a 1:1 CHCl /AcOH solvent mixture has been used. In that
3
case, the reaction was carried out at -40 °C while we tried to synthesize 5 in less drastic conditions of
temperature (cooled in an ice bath). Under these conditions, small amounts of the tetrabrominated
by-product were obtained. This product resulted hard to separate by purification from the product of our
interest. The use of DMF as solvent gave better results. Furthermore, better results were obtained working
2
3
always at 0 °C and in the dark as reported by Jung. Proceeding in this way, we obtained product of
interest 5 in good yield and the tetrabrominated byproduct was not observed at all (Scheme 2).
1
,3-Bis(5-bromo-2-thienyl)benzo[c]thiophene (5) was used as substrate in a cross-coupling reaction to
realize an acetylene coupling: this way allowed us to obtain 1,3-bis(5-ethynyl-2-
thienyl)benzo[c]thiophene (6) (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. DTBT bromination and Sonogashira cross-coupling reactions
The reaction was attempted by using several different reaction conditions. Pd(OAc)
triethylamine/THF, Pd(PPh /CuI in Et N/THF, PdCl (PPh /CuI in Et N/THF, PdCl (PPh
piperidine/THF, and PdCl (PPh /CuI in piperidine/toluene. The best reaction conditions were found
using four equivalents of trimethylsilylacetylene with PdCl (PPh (4% mol) and CuI (6% mol) as
2
/CuI in
3
)
4
3
2
3
)
2
3
2
)
3 2
/CuI in
2
)
3 2
2
)
3 2
catalysts, piperidine as base, and toluene as solvent. We obtained the compound 6 in a two-step synthetic
pathway. After Sonogashira coupling we obtained the corresponding trimethylsilyl derivative. The
acetylene protected functionality has been deprotected in standard basic condition in presence of K
2
CO
3
obtaining desired compound 6 with 80% yield.

316
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
In organic solar cells blending of PCBM ([6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester) with regioregular
poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) gave power conversion efficiencies up to 3.5% after annealing of the
2
4
devices. Higher efficiencies of more than 5% using P3HT and PCBM in bulk heterojunction tandem
solar cells have been recently reported.25,26 On the basis of these positive results, various attempts have
been made to covalently link C60 to an oligothiophene backbone in order to prepare D-A-based materials
and tuning their electronic properties for photovoltaic devices.27-30 The attachment of fullerene units
prevented large scale phase separation in thin films. Several examples of oligothiophenes linked to C60
have been reported.31-45
We decided to do a one-pot ethynylation that allows the attachment of fullerene C60 moiety to both
terminal alkynes as reported in Scheme 3.
1
) C ; LHMDS; THF
60
rt, 24 h
) TFA; rt, 24 h
S
2
S
S
18% yield
6
S
S
S
H
H
7
Scheme 3. Fullerene ethynylation
Ethynylated fullerenes can be prepared through the formation of lithium acetylide and the following
46
addition to fullerene as first reported by Komatsu. Lafleur-Lambert reported a coupling of a similar
47
substrate with fullerene. We modified the ethynylation experimental procedure. We decided to change
solvent because in THF fullerene showed a poor solubility. We found that by using chlorobenzene as
reaction solvent at room temperature, we can better dissolve the fullerene (in fact solubility of C60 in THF

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
317
is 0.04 g/L while in chlorobenzene is 6.35 g/L). In this way, we obtained desired product 7 with 18%
yield over last two steps.
With the aim to use the above described approach to the synthesis of extended  systems we synthesized
some asymmetric dithienybenzo[c]thiophenes. The approach is described in Scheme 4.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of nonsymmetric dithienylbenzo[c]thiophene derivatives
Scheme 5. Synthesis of the dimer of 11
Vilsmeier-Haack formylation of 4 gave the aldehyde 8 where only one thienyl ring showed the presence
of the carbonyl group. Bromination of the other thienyl ring gave the bromoaldehyde 9. Ethynylation with
trimethylsilylacetylene in the presence of PdCl
2
(PPh
3
2
) and CuI followed by deprotection of the alkyne

318
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
gave 11. Compound 11 was treated with LHDMS to give the corresponding dimer 12 (Scheme 5). It is
noteworthy the anomalous reactivity of 11. In fact, it did not react with fullerene if the lithium acetylide
of 11 was treated with this reagent, and did not give an addition reaction to the carbonyl group of another
molecule of the substrate: the only product we observed was the dimer 12.
A second dimer was obtained by coupling the aldehyde 8 with hydrazine as reported for the synthesis of
4
8
polymeric materials. The reaction of 8 with hydrazine gave the corresponding adduct 13 (Scheme 6).
Scheme 6. Reaction of 8 with hydrazine
In Figure 1 is reported the UV-Vis absorption spectrum of a solution of DTBT-(C60
absorption bands at 310 and 485 nm could be observed. The absorption band at 310 nm can be attributed
to a π-π* transition to the S state of the -conjugated system, while the absorption band at 485 nm could
be due to a π-π* transition into S state. The presence of the fullerene units induces a marked red shift
from 435 nm (DTBT) to 485 nm (DTBT-(C60 ).
Two different fluorescence bands were observed pumping the DTBT-(C60
)
2
(7) in CHCl
3
. Two
1
2
)
2
2
) system at the two different
wavelengths corresponding at each maximum absorption band present in the UV-Vis spectrum. Pumping
the system at 320 nm, a fluorescence band centered around 390 nm was observed, while pumping at 480
nm a fluorescence band centered around 575 nm was detected. In this case, a pronounced shoulder at 610
nm was observed (Figure 2).
A Stokes shift of 90 nm was determined. DTBT showed an emission maximum at 532 nm when irradiated
at 435 nm. The presence of the fullerene units induces an evident hypsochromic shift.

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
319
DTBT-(C60) 0.044 M/CHCl
2
3
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
max 310 nm
C60
max 485 nm

*
300
400
500
600
Wavelenght (nm)
Figure 1. DTBT-(C60
)
2
absorption UV-Vis spectrum of a 0.044 M solution in CHCl
3
DTBT-(C60) 0.5 mM/CHCl
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
.0
pump@480 nm
.8
.6
.4
.2
.0
540 560 580 600 620 640 660 680
Wavelenght (nm)
Figure 2. DTBT-(C60
)
2
emission spectrum of a 0.5 mM solution in CHCl
beam at 480 nm
3
acquired pumping with a laser
The HOMO of DTBT-(C60
)
2
was found at -0.17177 H and it is mainly localized on the
dithienyl-benzo[c]thiophene part of the molecule. Furthermore, the LUMO was found at 0.11032 H and
was localized on the fullerene (Figure 3). The calculations were performed at DFT/B3LYP/6-31G+(d,p)
level on Gaussian 09.49 These calculations shows that the HOMO →LUMO transition is an electron
transfer process.

320
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
Figure 3. HOMO and LUMO of DTBT-(C60
)
2
Figure 4. Dimer 12 absorption UV-Vis spectrum of a 0.016 mg/mL solution in CHCl
3
Dimer 12 showed the UV-Vis spectrum reported in Figure 4. The main absorption is a band centered at
75 nm, while another absorption band has a maximum at 320 nm. The fluorescence emission is red
4

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
321
shifted in comparison to that showed by 7 (Figure 5). Compound 12 showed an emission centered at
95 nm with a shift of 63 nm, if compared with 4, and 20 nm, if compared with 7. A Stokes shift of 120
5
nm was observed.
The HOMO of 12 was found at -0.20775 H and, while the LUMO was found at -0.09639 H (Figure 6).
Figure 5. Compound 12 emission spectrum of a 0.016 mg/mL solution in CHCl (exc 475 nm)
3
Figure 6. HOMO and LUMO of 12

322
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
Figure 7. Compound 13 absorption UV-Vis spectrum of a 0.2 mg/mL solution in TCE (violet) and DMSO
light blue)
(
Figure 8. Compound 13 emission spectrum of a 0.2 mg/mL solution in TCE (exc 340 nm: blue line, exc
80 nm: red line)
4
The calculations were performed at DFT/B3LYP/6-31G+(d,p) level on Gaussian 09.49 These
calculations shows that the HOMO →LUMO transition is a  transition. The UV-Vis spectrum of the

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
323
dimer 13 was recorded in DMSO and 1,1,2-trichloroethylene (Figure 7). In both cases, absorption bands
were observed at 340 and 480 nm. Both the absorption bands induced a fluorescence with very near
maxima (Figure 8). When the compound 13 was excited at 480 nm a low fluorescence band was observed
at 605 nm. Excitation at 340 nm gave an intense fluorescence band at 600 nm. A Stokes shift of 120 nm
was present also in this case.
The HOMO of 13 was found at -0.20049 H and, while the LUMO was found at -0.08817 H (Figure 9).
The calculations were performed at DFT/B3LYP/6-31G+(d,p) level on Gaussian 09.49 These
calculations shows that the HOMO →LUMO transition is a transition.
Figure 9. HOMO and LUMO of 13
In this article we have shown that dithienylbenzo[c]thiophene units can be used in the synthesis of new
oligothiophene derivatives. Compound 7 has the correct structure to be a donor-acceptor triad useful in
photovoltaic apparatus. Nevertheless, compounds 12 and 13 showed interesting photophysical properties
with emissions in the range 595-605 nm (yellow emission) and Stokes shifts of 120-125 nm.
EXPERIMENTAL
Dry solvents have been prepared by standard procedures. Chloroform (CHCl ) was purified by
3
distillation over calcium hydride. Dry THF, diethyl ether and toluene were refluxed over sodium
benzophenone and under argon until a dark blue solution was obtained and then distilled immediately
before use under nitrogen or argon. All other chemicals have been purchased from Sigma Aldrich and

324
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
used as received. All reaction involving organolithium reagents were carried out by using standard
techniques for the manipulation of air- and water-sensitive compounds. All of the experiments were
carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere unless otherwise stated. Liquids and solvents were transferred via
syringe. The progression of all of the reactions was monitored by TLC method. Analytical TLC was done
on Macherey-Nagel Alugram Sil G/UV254 alumina coated plates. Column chromatography was carried
1
13
out on silica gel Merk 60 (70-230 mesh). Spectra were obtained as follows: H NMR and C NMR
spectra were recorded with a Varian INOVA 400 (400 MHz) spectrometer and a Varian INOVA 500 in
CDCl using tetramethylsilane as an internal standard. Multiplicities are reported as follows: singlet (s),
3
doublet (d), triplet (t), quartet (q), multiplet (m). Gas-chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry
analysis were performed using a Hewlett Packard GC/MS 6890-5973 equipments.
1
,2-Phenylenebis(2-thienylmethanol) (2).
In a flask fitted with a reflux condenser magnesium turnings (280 mg, 11.67 mmol), I
amount) and 40 mL of dry THF were added. Stirring the solution under argon, the commercially available
-bromothiophene (900 L; 1.5 g; 9.30 mmol) in 10 mL of dry THF was added dropwise until the
2
(10 mg; catalytic
2
exothermic reaction started. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature to complete the
formation of the Grignard reagent and after 1.5 h the reagent was ready to be used for the next synthetic
step. The Grignard reagent was transferred via cannula dropwise at 0 °C under argon to a solution of the
commercial ortho-phthalaldehyde (1.99 g; 14.84 mmol) in 40 mL of dry THF. After addition the mixture
was allowed to warm up to room temperature and stirred for 3 h. The reaction was quenched using 20 mL
of a saturated ammonium chloride aqueous solution followed by extractions with 3 x 10 mL of EtOAc.
The organic phase was then treated with Na
crude was then purified by column chromatography over silica gel using petroleum ether/Et
eluent to give desired product (2) as mixture of “anti” and “sin” diols (3.39 g; 11.22 mmol, 76% yield).
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
) : 7.44 (m, 2 H), 7.29 (m, 4 H), 7.17 (m, 2H), 6.85 (m, 2 H), 6.695 (m, 2H),
and 6.14 ppm (s, 2 H). C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl ) : 147.27, 140.58, 128.78, 127.92, 127.07, 125.68,
25.31, and 70.04 ppm. Anal. Calcd for C16 (302.4): C, 63.55; H, 4.67; S, 21.21. Found: C, 63,44;
H, 4.70; S, 21.18%.
2
SO
4
and the solvent removed under reduced pressure. The
2
O (6:4)
3
1
3
3
1
H
14
O S
2 2
1
,2-Di-(2-thienoyl)benzene (3).
A round bottom flask was charged with diol 2 (3.39 g; 11.22 mmol) and pyridinium chlorochromate
PCC) (4.50 g; 22.44 mmol) with 60 mL of dry CH Cl . Under argon atmosphere and at room
temperature the mixture was stirred for 5 h. Then the reaction mixture was quenched adding 30 mL of
(
2
2

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
325
Et
2
O and the crude was filtered over silica using CHCl . After filtration the crude mixture was purified by
3
column chromatography over silica gel and petroleum ether/EtOAc (8:2) as eluent giving the desired
1
compound 3 (1.62 g: 5.44 mmol; 49% yield) as pale yellow crystals. H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
) : 7.73
1
3
(
m, 2 H), 7.64 (m, 4H), 7.46 (m, 2 H), and 7.06 ppm (m, 2 H). C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
3
) : 188.50,
+
1
44.28, 139.55, 135.36, 135.18, 130.83, 129.44, and 128.23 ppm. GC-MS (EI) m/z: 298.0 (M ). FT-IR
-1
(
KBr pellet) max cm : 1620, 1585, 1570, 1510, 1410. Anal. Calcd for C16
H
10
O
2
2
S (298.4): C, 64.40; H,
3
.38; S, 21.49. Found: C, 64.45; H, 3.30; S, 21.58%.
1
,3-Dithienylisothianaphthene (4).
A mixture of compound 3 (31 mg, 0.10 mmol), Lawesson’s reagent (LR) (46 mg, 0.11 mmol), and 3 mL
of dry CH Cl was stirred for 4 h at room temperature. After evaporation of the solvent, EtOH (4 mL) was
2
2
added into the residual red oil and the mixture was heated for 1 h at 40-50 °C. Then, the solvent was
evaporated under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by chromatography on silica gel
using petroleum ether as eluent. The final product 4 (29 mg, 99% yield) was obtained as an orange
1
13
powder. H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
) : 7.20 (m, 4 H), 7.15 (m, 3 H), and 7.00 ppm (m, 3 H). C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl
3
) : 135.57, 135.24, 127.86, 126.46, 125.57, 125.52, 124.76, and 121.49 ppm. GC-MS
+
-1
(
EI) m/z: 298.0 (M ). UV-Vis (CHCl
3
) max nm: 435. FT-IR (KBr pellet) max cm : 1530, 1216, 1182, 841,
7
38. Anal. Calcd for C16
10 3
H S
(298.5): C, 64.39; H, 3.38; S, 32.23. Found: C, 64.45; H, 3.30; S, 32.25%.
1
,3-Bis(5-bromo-2-thienyl)benzo[c]thiophene (5).
Under argon atmosphere, a solution of N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) (238 mg, 1.34 mmol) in 5 mL of dry
DMF was added dropwise to a solution of compound 4 (200 mg, 0.67 mmol) in 10 mL of dry DMF at
0
°C. The resulting mixture was stirred for 2 h at 0 °C, then the solution was warmed to room temperature
and stirred overnight. The orange mixture obtained was poured into water. The precipitate was filtered off
and re-crystallized from CHCl
3
/n-hexane (10 mL/15 mL). The product 5 was obtained as reddish
1
needle-like crystals (271 mg, 89% yield). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
) : 7.87 (dd, J = 4 Hz, 2 H), 7.15 (d,
1
3
J = 4 Hz, 2 H), and 7.07 ppm (m, 4 H). C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
3
) : 143.45, 136.99, 135.64, 130.95,
+
1
26.25, 125.50, 121.46, and 112.59 ppm. GC-MS (EI) m/z: 455.8 (M ). UV-Vis (CHCl
3
) max nm: 440.
-1
FT-IR (KBr pellet) max cm : 3062, 1529, 1489, 1433, 1190, 969, 788, 778, 734, 699, 582. Anal. Calcd
Br (456.2): C, 42.12; H, 1.77; S, 22.00. Found: C, 42.23; H, 1.65; S, 21.12%.
for C16
H
8
S
2 3
1
,3-Bis(5-ethynyl-2-thienyl)benzo[c]thiophene (6).

326
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
A round bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar was charged with compound 5 (60 mg, 0.13
mmol), dry toluene and piperidine (4 mL: 1 mL) under argon atmosphere. Then PdCl (PPh (4.4 mg,
.0065 mmol), CuI (3 mg, 0.013 mmol) and TMSA (74 L, 0.52 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture
2
)
3 2
0
was refluxed for 30 min. The crude was filtered and the orange crystals (64 mg, 99% yield) washed with
1
fresh toluene were characterized by H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
) : 7.92 (dd, J = 4 Hz, 2 H), 7.22 (d, J =
) : 137.18, 135.71, 133.58,
26.70, 125.64, 125.24, 123.17, 121.78, 101.20, 97.50, and 0.10 ppm. To the orange compound (64 mg,
.13 mmol) in a mixture 1:1 of MeOH/THF (4 mL/4 mL) an excess of K CO (100 mg, 0.72 mmol) was
1
3
4
1
0
Hz, 2 H), 7.15 (m, 4H), and 0.27 ppm (s, 18 H). C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
3
2
3
added. After 2 h stirring at room temperature and without inert atmosphere the solvent was removed
under reduced pressure. The crude was purified by chromatography on silica gel with petroleum ether as
eluent to afford compound 7 (28 mg, 62% yield and 80% over 2 steps) as a dark red amorphous powder.
1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl
) : 7.94 (dd, J = 5 Hz, 2 H), 7.35 (d, J = 5 Hz, 2 H), 7.25 (m, 4 H), and 3.49
ppm (s, 2 H). C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl ) : 137.23, 135.67, 133.90, 126.44, 125.77, 125.02, 121.85,
21.47, 104.88, and 82.94 ppm. Anal. Calcd for C20 (346.5): C, 69.33; H, 2.91; S, 27.76. Found: C,
9.30; H, 2.99; S, 27.71%.
3
1
3
3
1
6
H S
10 3
1
,3-Bis(5-ethynyl-2-thienyl)benzo[c]thiophene-di(hydrofullerene) (7).
A round bottom flask was charged with compound 6 (28 mg, 0.08 mmol), C60 (233 mg, 0.32 mmol) and
dry chlorobenzene (32 mL). Then LiHMDS 1.0 M/THF (350 L, 0.35 mmol) was added to the
reddish-brown solution. After the addition of LiHMDS, the reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h and
quenched with trifluoroacetic acid (805 L, 10.5 mmol). The dark violet reaction mixture was stirred at
room temperature for 24 h before the first filtration performed under vacuum to eliminate the excess of
unreacted C. After removal of the solvent the crude product was diluted in CH
2
Cl , filtered under
2
vacuum to remove residual unreacted C60 and the solvent was removed in reduced pressure. The crude
product purified by column chromatography on silica gel with 50% toluene/EtOAc as eluent to afford
1
compound 7 (19 mg, 18% yield) as a dark orange amorphous powder. H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
) :
1
3
8
.04 (m, 2 H), 7.93 (m, 2 H), 7.70 (m, 2 H), 7.15 (m, 2 H), and 6.98 ppm (m, 2 H). C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl ) : 134.8, 134.8, 134.5, 133.4, 133.3, 132.0, 130.4, 130.3, 129.2, 129.2, 128.8, 128.8, 128.8, 128.8,
28.3, 128.1, 128.1, 128.0, 127.79, 127.7, 127.5, 127.2, 127.1, 126.9, 126.5, 126.3, 126.3, 126.27, 125.3,
25.29, 124.6, 124.5, 124.49, 124.4, 124.0, 123.7, 123.3, 122.3, 79.5, 79.44, 64.4, and 54.7 ppm. Anal.
(1787.8): C 94.06; H, 0.56; S, 5.38. Found: C, 94.15; H, 0,50; S, 5.35%.
3
1
1
Calcd for C140
H S
10 3
5
-(3-(2-Thienyl)benzo[c]-1-thienyl)thiophene-2-carbaldehyde (8).

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
327
Under argon atmosphere in a round bottom flask at 0 °C, POCl (625 L, 1.03 g, 6.71 mmol) was slowly
3
added to a mixture of dry DMF (519 L, 490 mg, 6.71 mmol) and dry DCM (15 mL). After stirring for 1
h at 0 °C and 3 h at room temperature the reaction mixture became light yellow colored. Then the reaction
mixture was added at 0 °C and under air exclusion to substrate 4 (1 g, 3.35 mmol) dissolved into dry
DCM (30 mL) and stirred overnight at room temperature. In order to quench the reaction a saturated
NaHCO solution was added and the mixture stirred for 1 h. After few extractions with DCM the organic
3
phases were collected and by solvent evaporation the crude was obtained as a red thick oil. The
subsequent purification by column chromatography using petroleum ether/EtOAc (9:1) as eluent mixture
1
gave the desired product (8) as a red powder (787 mg; 72% yield). H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
) : 9.91 (s,
1
3
1
H,), 8.03 (dd, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H,), 7.77 (d, J = 4 Hz, 1 H,), 7.43 (m, 2 H), and 7.22 ppm (m, 4 H). C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl ) : 182.53, 147.90, 142.00, 137.27, 136.58, 135.85, 135.05, 130.09, 128.33,
3
1
26.82, 126.73, 126.66, 125.44, 125.40, 124.90, 122.22, and 121.51 ppm. GC-MS (EI) m/z: 326.0 (M+).
Anal. Calcd for C17
H
10OS (326.5): C, 62.55; H, 3.09; S, 29.47. Found: C, 62.49; H, 3.12; S, 29.60%.
3
5-(3-(5-Bromo-2-thienyl)benzo[c]-1-thienyl)thiophene-2-carbaldehyde (9).
Under exclusion of the air, a solution of N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) (273 mg, 1.50 mmol) in 10 mL of
dry DMF was added dropwise to a solution of compound 8 (500 mg, 1.50 mmol) in 50 mL of dry DMF at
0
°C. The resulting mixture was stirred for 3 h at 0 °C, afterwards the solution was wormed up to room
temperature. The orange mixture obtained was poured into water and the red precipitate formed was
filtered off and washed with water. The solid was purified further by column chromatography with the
mixture hexanes/EtOAc (8:2) obtaining the desired product 9 as a deep red powder (568 mg, 93% yield).
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
) : 9.81 (s, 1 H,), 7.93 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.79 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H,), 7.65 (m,
3
1
3
4
1
1
2
H), 7.45 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1 H), and 7.31 ppm (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1 H,). C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl ) : 182.4,
3
37.1, 136.2, 135.4, 135.0, 134.1, 131.3, 131.2, 131.1, 131.0, 130.9, 129.4, 129.3, 126.5, 125.5, 125.4, and
+
21.3 ppm. GC-MS (EI) m/z: 405.9 (M ). Anal. Calcd for C17
H
9
BrOS (405.4): C, 50.37; H, 2.24; S,
3
3.73. Found: C, 50.42; H, 2.30; S, 23.65%.
5
-(3-(5-((Trimethylsilyl)ethynyl)-2-thienyl)benzo[c]-1-thienyl)thiophene-2-carbaldehyde (10).
A round bottom flask equipped with magnetic stir bar was charged with compound 9 (434 mg, 1.07
mmol), piperidine and dry toluene 1:4 (10 mL, 40 mL respectively) under argon atmosphere. Then the
catalyst PdCl
2
(PPh
3
2
) 4% mol (30 mg, 0.04 mmol), the co-catalyst CuI 6% mol (12 mg, 0.06 mmol) and
TMSA 2.5 eq (468 L, 323 mg, 3.29 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture was refluxed for 9 h. Then
it was allowed to cool down to room temperature and filtered on florisil. The crude was purified by

328
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
column chromatography on silica gel with the mixture hexanes/EtOAc (8:2) and the desired product 10
1
(
144 mg, 32% yield) was collected as red greenish crystals. H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
) : 9.84 (s, 1 H),
7
7
1
1
6
.97 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.69 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.35 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1 H),
1
3
.17 (m, 4 H), and 0.27 ppm (s, 9 H). C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
3
) : 182.49, 145.65, 142.23, 137.19,
36.58, 136.52, 135.97, 133.60, 126.72, 125.94, 125.84, 125.83, 125.69, 125.53, 124.12, 122.08, 121.61,
01.69, 97.24, and 0.04 ppm. Anal. Calcd for C22
2.59; H, 4.21; S, 22.62%.
H
18OS Si (422.7): C, 62.52; H, 4.29; S, 22.76. Found: C,
3
5-(3-(5-Ethynyl-2-thienyl)benzo[c]-1-thienyl)thiophene-2-carbaldehyde (11).
At room temperature the substrate 10 (316 mg, 0.75 mmol) in a mixture 1:1 of MeOH/THF (40 mL) was
treated with an excess of K CO (700 mg, 5.07 mmol) and was stirred overnight. The reaction mixture
2
3
was filtered on celite and the solvent was removed by vacuum evaporation. The crude was purified by
chromatography on silica gel with hexanes/EtOAc (8:2) to afford the desired compound 11 (103 mg, 39%
1
yield) as a dark red amorphous powder. H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
) : 9.79 (s, 1 H), 7.88 (d, J = 8.0 Hz,
1
3
1
H), 7.75 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.63 (m, 2 H), 7.27 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.10 (m, 2 H), 6.99 (s, 1 H), and
1
3
.04 ppm (s, 1 H). C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl
33.8, 128.9, 126.7, 126.4, 125.9, 125.6, 125.4, 121.8, 121.4, 83.5, and 83.3 ppm. Anal. Calcd for
(350.5): C, 65.11; H, 2.88; S, 27.45. Found: C, 65.05; H, 2.95; S, 27.38%.
3
) : 182.4, 145.4, 142.1, 137.1, 137.0, 136.4, 135.9, 134.1,
C
19
H10OS
3
5
,5'-(3,3'-(5,5'-(Buta-1,3-diyne-1,4-diyl)bis(thiophene-5,2-diyl))bis(benzo[c]thiophene-3,1-diyl))bis-
(thiophene-2-carbaldehyde) (12).
A round bottom flask was charged with compound 11 (54 mg, 0.15 mmol) dissolved into dry toluene (12
mL). Then 2.1 equivalent of LiHMDS 1.0 M/THF (290 L, 49 mg, 0.29 mmol) was added dropwise to
the red solution. After the addition of LiHMDS, the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for
2
h. Successively, 2 more equivalents of LiHMDS (280 L, 47 mg, 0.28 mmol) were added. After 1 h
from the last addition this reaction mixture was refluxed for 1 h. After that the reaction mixture was
turned from red to brown and it was cooled down to room temperature. The quenching was conducted
adding slowly 1.5 mL of trifluoroacetic acid. At the end of the addition the mixture was red in color and
was stirred at room temperature overnight. After removal of the solvent the crude mixture was diluted in
DCM and then it was removed by filtration. The crude was purified by column chromatography on silica
1
gel using toluene as eluent to afford the dimer 12 (25 mg, 55% yield) as a red orange solid. H NMR (400
MHz, CDCl
3
) : 9.90 (s, 2 H), 8.02 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.89 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.75 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 2
13
H), 7.41 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.23 (m, 4 H), and 7.12 ppm (s, 4 H). C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
3
) : 182.6,

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
329
1
1
6
49.9, 149.1, 146.1, 145.7, 142.2, 141.9, 137.3, 136.5, 136.5, 136.0, 131.1, 126.8, 126.7, 125.8, 125.7,
21.8, 121.6, and 113.5 ppm. Anal. Calcd for C38
5.38; H, 2.50; S, 27.48%.
H
18
O
2
6
S (698.9): C, 65.30; H, 2.60; S, 27.53. Found: C,
1,2-Bis((5-(3-(2-thienyl)benzo[c]-1-thienyl)-2-thienyl)methylene)hydrazine (13).
The dimerization reaction was conducted by simply refluxing the monoaldehyde 8 (20 mg, 0.06 mmol)
dissolved into 2 mL of EtOH and 2 mL of CHCl with an equimolar amount of hydrazine monohydrate (3
L) in EtOH (500 L). The reaction was carried out under argon atmosphere and at room temperature for
h and successively for 17 h at reflux temperature. The solvent was removed under low pressure
3

4
evaporation and 2.5 mL of 1,1,2-trichloroethane were added and the mixture was allowed to reflux for 6 h,
still under argon atmosphere. The mixture was cooled down and the solvent removed. The crude was
purified by column chromatography in silica gel with the mixture hexanes/EtOAc (9:1) obtaining the
1
desired dimer 13 (22 mg, 60% yield) as a deep violet solid. H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
) : 8.79 (s, 2 H),
8
.09 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 8.04 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.98 (m, 2 H), 7.75 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.39 (m, 6 H),
and 7.18 ppm (m, 7 H). GC-HRMS (ESI) m/z: 649.00 (M+). C34
H
20
N
2
6
S requires 648.93.
REFERENCES
1
2
3
4
5
.
.
.
.
.
J. Roncali, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 173.
M. D'Auria, Adv. Heterocycl. Chem., 2011, 104, 127.
F. Wudl, M. Kobayashi, and A. J. Heeger, J. Org. Chem., 1984, 49, 3382.
M. Kertesz, C. H. Choi, and S. Yang, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 3448.
H. Neugebauer, C. Kvamstrom, C. Brabec, N. S. Sariciftci, R. Kiebooms, F. Wudl, and S. Luzzati,
J. Chem. Phys., 1999, 110, 12108.
6.
7.
8.
9.
B. L. Lee and T. Yamamoto, Macromolecules, 1999, 32, 1375.
M. Kobayashi, J. Chen, T. C. Chung, F. Moraes, A. J. Heeger, and F. Wudl, Synth. Met., 1984, 9, 77.
M. Kobayashi, N. Colaneri, M. Boysel, F. Wudl, and A. J. Heeger, J. Chem. Phys., 1985, 82, 5717.
M. Pomerantz, B. Chaloner-Gill, L. O. Harding, J. J. Tseng, and W. J. Pomerantz, Synth. Met., 1993,
5
5, 960.
0. D. L. Vangeneugden, R. H. L. Kiebooms, D. J. M. Vanderzande, and J. M. J. V. Gelan, Synth. Met.,
999, 101, 120.
1
1
1
1. T.-T. Hung and S.-A. Chen, Polymer, 1999, 40, 3881.
1
2. R. H. L. Kiebooms, P. J. A. Adriaensens, D. J. M. Vanderzande, and J. M. J. V. Gelan, J. Org. Chem.,
1
997, 62, 1473.
1
3. P. Bäurie, G. Gotz, P. Emerle, and H. Port, Adv. Mater., 1992, 4, 564.

330
HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
1
4. D. Lorcy and M. P. Cava, Adv. Mater., 1992, 4, 562.
1
5. A. K. Mohanakrishnan, M. V. Lakshmikantham, C. McDougal, M. P. Cava, J. W. Baldwin, and R. M.
Metzger, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 3105.
1
1
1
6. U. Mitschke and P. Bäuerle, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 2001, 740.
7. A. K. Mohanakrishnan, P. Amaladass, and J. Arul Clement, Tetrahedron Lett., 2007, 48, 779.
8. D. L. Vangeneugden, D. J. M. Vanderzande, J. Salbeck, P. A. van Hal, R. A. J. Janssen, J. C.
Hummelen, C. J. Brabec, S. E. Shaheen, and N. S. Sariciftci, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 11106.
9. M. D'Auria, A. Guarnaccio, R. Racioppi, A. Santagata, and R. Teghil, Synlett, 2013, 24, 943.
0. S. Musmanni and J. P. Ferraris, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1993, 172.
1. G. Piancatelli, A. Scettri, and M. D'Auria, Synthesis, 1982, 245.
1
2
2
2
2
2. R. Kisselev and M. Thelakkat, Chem. Commun., 2002, 1530.
3. Y. K. Jung, H. Kim, J.-H. Park, J. Lee, S. K. Lee, Y. S. Lee, and H.-K. Shim, J. Polym. Sci., A:
Polym. Chem., 2008, 46, 3573.
2
4. F. Padinger, R. S. Rittberger, and N. S. Sariciftci, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2003, 13, 85.
5. G. Li, V. Shrotriya, J. Huang, Y. Yao, T. Moriarty, K. Emery, and Y. Yang, Nature Mater., 2005, 4,
2
8
64.
2
2
2
2
3
3
6. W. Ma, C. Yang, X. Gong, K. Lee, and A. J. Heeger, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2005, 15, 1617.
7. J. Roncali, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2005, 34, 483.
8. J. L. Segura, N. Martin, and D. M. Guldi, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2005, 34, 31.
9. A. Cravino and N. S. Sariciftici, J. Mater. Chem., 2002, 12, 1931.
0. T. Otsubo, Y. Aso, and K. Takimiya, Pure Appl. Chem., 2005, 77, 2003.
1. T. Benincori, E. Brenna, F. Sannicolò, L. Trimarco, G. Zotti, and P. Sozzani, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1996, 35, 648.
3
2. A. Yassar, M. Hmyene, D. C. Loveday, and J. P. Ferraris, Synth. Met., 1997, 84, 231.
3. A. Cravino, G. Zerza, M. Maggini, S. Bucella, M. Svensson, M. R. Andersson, H. Neugebauer, and
N. S. Sariciftci, Chem. Commun., 2000, 2487.
3
3
4. A. Cravino, G. Zerza, H. Neugebauer, M. Maggini, S. Bucella, E. Menna, M. Svensson, M. R.
Andersson, C. J. Brabec, and N. S. Sariciftci, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 70.
5. Y. Murata, M. Suzuki, and K. Komatsu, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2003, 1, 2624.
6. T. Yamazaki, Y. Murata, K. Komatsu, K. Furukawa, M. Morita, N. Maruyama, T. Yamao, and S.
Fujita, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 4865.
3
3
3
3
7. F. Effenberger and G. Grube, Synthesis, 1998, 1372.
8. S.-G. Liu, L. Shu, J. Rivera, H. Liu, J.-M. Raimundo, J. Roncali, A. Gorgues, and L. Echegoyen, J.
Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 4884.

HETEROCYCLES, Vol. 91, No. 2, 2015
331
3
9. T. Yamashiro, Y. Aso, T. Otsubo, H. Tang, Y. Harima, and K. Yamashita, Chem. Lett., 1999, 28, 443.
0. P. A. van Hal, J. Knol, B. M. W. Langeveld-Voss, S. C. J. Meskers, J. C. Hummelen, and R. A. J.
Janssen, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2000, 104, 5974.
4
4
4
4
1. N. Negishi, K. Takimiya, T. Otsubo, Y. Harima, and Y. Aso, Chem. Lett., 2004, 33, 654.
2. Y. Obara, K. Takimiya, Y. Aso, and T. Otsubo, Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 6877.
3. M. Narutaki, K. Takimiya, T. Otsubo, Y. Harima, H. Zhang, Y. Araki, and O. Ito, J. Org. Chem., 2006,
7
1, 1761.
4
4. H. Kanato, M. Narutaki, K. Takimiya, T. Otsubo, and Y. Harima, Chem. Lett., 2006, 35, 668.
5. T. L. Chen, Y. Zhang, P. Smith, A. Tamayo, Y. Liu, and B. Ma, Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2011, 3,
4
2
275.
6. K. Komatsu, Y. Murata, N. Takimoto, S. Mori, N. Sugita, and T. S. M. Wan, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59,
101.
7. A. Lafleur-Lambert, S. Rondeau-Gagné, A. Soldera, and J. F. Morin, Tetrahedron Lett., 2011, 52,
008.
4
4
6
5
4
8. W. Hong, B. Sun, H. Aziz, W.-T. Park, and Y.-Y. Noh, Chem. Commun., 2012, 8413.
9. Gaussian 09, Revision A.1, M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J.
R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X.
Li, H. P. Hratchian, A. F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino, G. Zheng, J. L. Sonnenberg, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K.
Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, T. Vreven, J.
A. Montgomery, Jr., J. E. Peralta, F. Ogliaro, M. Bearpark, J. J. Heyd, E. Brothers, K. N. Kudin, V. N.
Staroverov, R. Kobayashi, J. Normand, K. Raghavachari, A. Rendell, J. C. Burant, S. S. Iyengar, J.
Tomasi, M. Cossi, N. Rega, J. M. Millam, M. Klene, J. E. Knox, J. B. Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J.
Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R. E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A. J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J. W.
Ochterski, R. L. Martin, K. Morokuma, V. G. Zakrzewski, G. A. Voth, P. Salvador, J. J. Dannenberg,
S. Dapprich, A. D. Daniels, O. Farkas, J. B. Foresman, J. V. Ortiz, J. Cioslowski, and D. J. Fox,
Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2009.
4