7912
Q.-S. Xin and X.-Y. Zhu: Dissociation dynamics of phosgene
of excess excitation energy to the cold environment, which is
not observed here. This can be demonstrated by simple en-
ergetic considerations. For a photodissociation process de-
scribed by the following overall reaction,
tainty, we found no correlation between translation and rota-
tion ͑Fig. 8͒ or between rotation and vibration ͑Figs. 9 and
10͒.
The dependence of product state distribution on photon
energy provides particular insight into dissociation dynam-
ics. Among the three coordinates of motion, ͗Etrans͘ depends
Cl2COϩh→COϩ2Cl,
͑5͒
most strongly on h, while ͗Evib͘ or Nϭ1/N
is, within
the maximum excess energy available to the products is sim-
ply the difference between the photon energy and the energy
required to break two Cl–CO bonds ͑3.56 eV͒. At hϭ5.0
eV, the available energy is Eaϭ1.44 eV; the total energy
ϭ0
experimental uncertainty, independent of h. The rotational
state distribution is an intermediate situation, in which the
distribution at low JЉ(s) is h dependent while that at high
JЉ(s) is insensitive to h. The insensitivity of CO vibra-
tional distribution suggests the dominance of a mechanism
implied by the ‘‘equilibrium geometry’’ model.7 To elabo-
rate, the vibrational distribution of product CO is determined
by the C–O bond length at the transition state for Cl–CO
bond cleavage. The C–O bond in ClCO is likely more
stretched than that in CO. As a result, vibrational excitation
in CO is expected from this reaction. The positive correlation
of ͗Etrans͘ and h can be interpreted by a simple ‘‘impulsive
model.’’ 7 In this simple model, the initial photoexcitation
provides a sudden impulse to one of the two Cl–CO bonds.
This ‘‘impulse,’’ which scales with h, is converted to trans-
lational energies in Cl and ClCO and the internal energy in
Cl–CO, based on momentum considerations. The internal
energy in Cl–CO is in turn converted to motions of CO and
Cl. The rotational distribution can perhaps be interpreted by
a combination of ‘‘equilibrium geometry’’ and ‘‘sudden im-
pulse’’ mechanisms. We must point out that the above dis-
cussions are only speculations based on models developed in
the gas phase for extreme situations. A microscopic picture
of how surrounding molecules affect the photochemical dy-
namics in the condensed phase remains to be developed. In
this regard, detailed knowledge on the state resolved dynam-
ics of corresponding gas phase photochemistry would be
rather beneficial.
distributed in the products is ͗Etotal͘ϭ͗E
trans͘COϩ͗Erot͘CO
ϩ͗Evib COϩ2͗Etrans͘Clϭ1.06 eV. Therefore, only 26% of the
͘
available energy is lost to the environment. Such a small
percentage of energy loss is remarkable, considering the fact
that the dissociating Cl2CO molecule is embedded in a cold
matrix of other Cl2CO molecules. The nascent products must
be promptly ejected into the gas phase; the small energy loss
perhaps only reflects the immediate movement of neighbor-
ing molecules during the dynamic process. We are not able
to reliably address the energetics at hϭ6.4 eV, due to the
lack of accurate knowledge on ͗Etrans͘ of Cl at this photon
energy. We estimate that the percentage of energy loss to the
environment is higher, ϳ50%. Whether radiative energy loss
or electronically excited Cl is also involved remains an open
question.
A possible pathway for prompt energy transfer from the
dissociating molecule to the surrounding can be compre-
hended if we borrow the mechanistic picture on ‘‘cage ef-
fect,’’ developed for photodissociation in the solution
phase.14 If a Cl2CO molecule absorbs a photon, it is pro-
moted to the dissociative excited potential, which in the gas
phase should lead to dissociation with 100% quantum yield.7
On the surface of the molecular film, the separating frag-
ments on the excited potential should encounter surrounding
molecules within the first molecular layer, as well as second
layer molecules immediately below, thus forcing a transient
‘‘expansion’’ of the local environment. This can serve as an
efficient pathway for prompt energy transfer in dissociation
dynamics.
Another possible mechanism for energy loss to the envi-
ronment is via inter-molecular quenching of the electroni-
cally excited state. Depending on the location on the reaction
coordinate where quenching occurs ͑in other words, the life-
time on the excited state͒, the electronically quenched mol-
ecule may still proceed to dissociation, albeit with less en-
ergy available to products. In this scenario, the shorter time
the molecule spends on the excited state, the less energy
͑provided it meets the minimum energetic requirement͒ is
available to the products. A similar mechanism, the so-called
Menzel–Gomer–Redhead ͑MGR͒ model, has been well es-
tablished for photodissociation on solid surfaces.15 However,
we believe such an electronic quenching process is not im-
portant for the final state distributions here. Quenching of
electronic energy should be manifested in the decrease in
energy disposal to the products’ freedom of motions. There-
fore, a correlation between various degrees of freedom,
which reflects the distribution of lifetime on the excited po-
tential, is usually expected. Within our experimental uncer-
IV. CONCLUSIONS
The final state distributions of CO (g) resulting from the
single photon photodissociation of Cl2CO in a solid film are
characterized by two distinctively different channels: ͑i͒ a
completely thermalized channel which can be attributed to
photodissociation products originating below the topmost
surface; and ͑ii͒ an energetic channel with disparate and pho-
ton energy dependent final state distributions. CO molecules
from this channel must be promptly ejected into the gas
phase, carrying nascent energetic information from the pho-
todissociation reaction on the surface of the molecular film.
For electronic excitation events that result in photodissocia-
tion at hϭ5.0 eV, 74% of the excess excitation energy is
distributed in the translational and internal motions of prod-
ucts ͑CO and Cl͒.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Science Foun-
dation, Grant No. CHE-9415337. Partial support from the
Camille and Henry Dreyfus New Faculty Award is also ac-
knowledged.
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 104, No. 20, 22 May 1996
130.209.6.50 On: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 07:40:45