COMMUNICATIONS
packing[7b] reveals that the sodium cations are located on both
sides of the crown, along its virtual fourfold symmetry axis,
and in close contact with the carbonate oxygen atoms.
Let us confess that the source of sodium ions in the original
preparation giving the first crystals of 3 was incidental: We
believe they came from our glassware which had been cleaned
by immersion into an ethanolic NaOH bath and might have
been insufficiently rinsed. It is amazing that such traces of
sodium ions were selectively removed from the solution by
the multiply charged anion just acting as a crown ether.
Of course, the carbonate ligand originates from the reaction
products, namely, CO2 and H2O. Evidence for this dual origin
could be obtained by simple modifications of the experimen-
tal conditions: First, when the released CO2 was evacuated
under reduced pressure, the minor product obtained in
addition to 2 was no longer 3, but the known oxo species 4
(Scheme 5),[15, 16] the oxygen atom of which comes from the
water released in the reaction [see Eq. (1)]. The oxo
compound even became the major product when more water
was added. Second, we found that improved yields of 3 can be
obtained when the reaction is carried out in the presence of
NaHCO3 (see the Experimental Section).
philes, demonstrate the ability of halides or pseudohalides to
mediate an interplay between low oxidation states of ruthe-
nium, with possible relevance for their role as promoters in
many catalytic systems.[6, 18]
We have recently observed that treatment of 1 with
[NEt4][OH] at 258C in the presence of various unsaturated
incoming substrates (e.g., olefins, alkynes, formate esters)
does not yield the polymer 2, but new trappable adducts
between these substrates and the unsaturated fragments thus
generated.
Experimental Section
2: A solid sample of 1[1] (500 mg, 1.5 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol (ca. 1 ±
2 mL) and stirred in a small Schlenk flask under nitrogen. A 1.5m solution
of NEt4OH in methanol (1 mL) was added dropwise. Magnetic stirring was
stopped after 2 min. Homogeneous large crystals of 2 suitable for X-ray
diffraction were obtained within 2 h. The mother liquor was then
cannulated into another tube and kept separately. Slower crystallization
of the minor product 3 was then observed after a few days; a direct
synthesis of 3 was also devised (see below). Crystals of 2 were washed with
dichloromethane and alcohol, and isolated (420 mg, 95% yield). IR (KBr
pellets from single crystals): nÄ 2052(s), 2043(s), 2021(s), 1984(s), 1962(s),
1
1944(sh), 1928(sh), 1728(s), 1723(s) cm (n(CO)). The crystals are only
soluble in CH3CN, which, however, causes disruption of the polymer as
indicated by 1) the disappearance of the absorption for the bridging CO
group (IR (CH3CN): nÄ 2047(s), 2021(s), 1982(s), 1964(s) cm) and 2) the
detection of the ion [Ru2(CO)4Cl3] (m/z 422.6) in the electrospray mass
spectrum.
[NEt4]2[Ru4(m-O)(m-Cl)4(CO)10]
4
(CO)2
3: Complex 1 (500 mg, 1.5 mmol) and NaHCO3 (126 mg, 1.5 mmol) were
dissolved in ethanol (10 mL). After addition of a 1.5m solution of NEt4OH
in methanol (1 mL), the solution was heated at 858C for 5 min, during
which the orange color intensified. After addition of acetone (2 mL), the
solution was allowed to crystallize at room temperature.[13] Crystals of 3
suitable for X-ray diffraction appeared on the walls of the glassware over a
period of 5 d. They were isolated by filtration and washed with ethanol
(70 mg, 19% yield). IR (KBr pellets from single crystals): nÄ 2028(vs),
Ru
O
Cl
C
Cl
O
Ru(CO)2
C
(OC)2Ru
Cl
Ru
(CO)2
O
Cl
Scheme 5. The dianionic unit of the oxo cluster 4.
1
1953(m), 2021(s), 1948(s, br), 1910(m) (n(CO)), 1532(s) cm (n(OCO)).
13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CD3CN) d 204.8, 204.6 (CO), 169.5 (CO3), 52.5
Thus, the addition of [NEt4][OH] to 1 at 258C in concen-
trated solution appears to be a simple, rapid, and mild
procedure to generate unsaturated ruthenium carbonyl halide
fragments in a low oxidation state. Such fragments are prone
to either polymerization in the absence of donor ligand or
capturing any potentially coordinating molecule (including
those produced in situ, as observed here). Consequently, we
should be able to quench the polymerization process by any
incoming donor ligand.[17] Effectively, if we saturate the
solution and the atmosphere of the Schlenk flask with CO
prior to the addition of [NEt4][OH] to 1 at 258C, we do not
generate the polymer 2. Instead, a 1/1 mixture of [Ru3(CO)12]
and [NEt4][Ru(CO)3Cl3] is recovered after a few hours. A
glance at the basic unit of 2 allows an understanding of this
phenomenon: The relative oxidation states of the two metal
centers within the dimeric unit depend formally on how the
bridging halides share their three electrons. Thus, the RuI ±
RuI dimer can be alternatively viewed as a Ru0 ± RuII dimer in
which we can even visualize the preformed ligand environ-
ment of the RuII center, ª[Ru(CO)3Cl3] º. Disruption of the
chain by CO leads to a net differentiation between Ru0 and
RuII centers.
(N(CH2CH3)4 ), 14 (N(CH2CH3)4 ); ES-MS (CH3CN): m/z: 843
([Na2(Ru8(CO3)4Cl4(CO)16)]2 ), 1816 ([Na2(NEt4)(Ru8(CO3)4Cl4(CO)16)] ),
1758 ([Na(NEt4)(Ru8(CO3)4Cl3(CO)16)] ), 1651 ([Na2(Ru8(CO3)4Cl3-
(CO)16)] ).
Received: August 6, 1999 [Z13839IE]
German version: Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 3919 ± 3922
Keywords: carbonyl complexes ´ cluster compounds ´ hal-
ogens ´ polyanions ´ ruthenium
[1] M. Faure, L. Maurette, B. Donnadieu, G. Lavigne, Angew. Chem.
1999, 111, 539 ± 542; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 518 ± 522.
[2] V. V. Grushin, Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 279 ± 286.
[3] D. Huang, R. Folting, K. G. Caulton, Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 7035± 7040
[4] B. M. Trost, Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 2405 ± 2412.
[5] G. Lavigne, Eur. J. Chem. 1999, 917 ± 930.
[6] For an example of a RuII hydride exhibiting parallel reactivity, see T.
Funaioli, C. Cavazza, F. Marchetti, G. Fachinetti, Inorg. Chem. 1999,
38, 3361 ± 3368.
[7] a) Crystallographic data for 2: orthorhombic, space group Cmca; a
11.721(2), b 19.580(2), c 17.686(2) ; V 4058.9(9) 3; R 0.026,
Rw 0.057. b) Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for
the structures reported in this paper have been deposited with the
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publica-
tions nos. CCDC-133106 (2) and 133107 (3). Copies of the data can be
obtained free of charge on application to CCDC, 12 Union road,
Cambridge, CB2 1EZ, UK (fax: (44)1223-336-033; e-mail: deposit@
ccdc.cam.ac.uk).
The present observation is reminiscent of the CO-induced
disproportionation of [Ru2X2(CO)6] (X CF3COO) in the
presence of an excess of X .[8] Our concordant findings,
probably generalizable to a range of other anionic nucleo-
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, No. 24
ꢀ WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH, D-69451 Weinheim, 1999
1433-7851/99/3824-3709 $ 17.50+.50/0
3709