2528
S. L. Deng, R. Y. Chen
PAPER
gen bonds exist in the form of Sa…HN (a: –x, –y + 1, – z
+ 1). The crystallographic analysis also indicates that
there exists a d–p bond between P and N atoms because
the P–N bond length (1.706 Å) is apparently shorter than
that of a normal single P–N bond (1.76Å).14
Figure 1 ORTEP diagram of compound 2a
Scheme 1
To account for the formation of compounds 2a–f, the gen-
eration of phosphorus heterocycle M may supply impor-
tant information. On the basis of literature, the species M
was often produced via sulfur–oxygen exchange in most
reactions of Lawesson’s reagent with aldehydes,15 ke-
tones,16 amides17 and esters.18 In connection with our re-
action, the formation of compound M at a different
temperature analogously indicates that sulfur–oxygen ex-
change initially takes place, resulting in the corresponding
thiols. On the other hand, some points in the related stud-
ther confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis. A single
crystal of compound 2a, which was cultured in a mixture
of diethyl ether and light petroleum ether (1:5, v/v), was
subjected to X-ray diffraction analysis. The crystal struc-
ture of 2a is displayed in Figure1. The crystallographic
data and structural refinement for 2a are listed in Table 2.
The crystallographic data reveals that the five-membered
heterocycle is nearly planar and the intermolecular hydro-
Table 1 Compounds 2a–f Prepared
Producta Yield Mp
(%)b (°C)
Molecular
Formulac
31P NMR
(CDCl3)d
1H NMR (CDCl3)
(J, Hz)
2a
2b
2c
2d
85
75
68
62
124–126 C11H14NOPS3 67.87
166–167 C12H16NOPS3 69.05
142–145 C13H18NOPS3 69.72
178–180 C13H18NOPS3 72.47
1.87 (s, 3 H, CH3), 2.01 (s, 3 H, CH3), 3.86 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 7.02 (dd, 2 Harom, 4JPH
= 3.50, 3JH-H = 7.24), 7.96 (dd, 2 Harom, 3JP-H = 10.4, 3JH-H = 7.24), 8.92 (br, 1 H,
NH)
1.11–1.23 (m, 3 H, CH3), 1.88 (s, 3 H, CH3), 1.90–2.43 (dm, 2 H, CH2), 3.87 (s,
4
3
3 H, OCH3), 6.99 (dd, 2 Harom, JP-H = 3.24, JH-H = 7.56), 7.86 (dd, 2 Harom
,
3JP-H = 8.68, 3JH-H = 7.56), 8.74 (br, 1 H, NH)
0.96 (t, 3 H, 3JH-H = 7.26, CH3), 1.48–1.70 (m, 2 H, CH2), 1.96 (s, 3 H, CH3), 1.90–
4
2.30 (m, 2 H, CH2), 3.86 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 6.98 (dd, 2 Harom, JP-H = 3.47,
3JH-H = 7.84), 7.94 (dd, 2 Harom, 3JP-H = 8.97, 3JH-H = 7.84), 8.03 (br, 1 H, NH)
1.10 (d, 3 H, 3JH-H = 7.06, CH3), 1.16 (d, 3 H, 3JH-H = 7.08, CH3), 1.96 (s, 3 H,
CH3), 3.37 (m, 1 H, CH), 3.87 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 6.92 (dd, 2 Harom, 4JP-H = 3.20,
3JH-H = 7.04), 7.98 (dd, 2 Harom, 3JP-H = 9.47, 3JH-H = 7.04), 9.30 (br, 1 H, NH)
2e
2f
59
58
156–158 C12H16NOPS3 78.88, 75.56 1.08–1.21 (m, 6 H, 2 CH3), 3.45 (m, 1 H, CH), 3.88 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 4.71–4.82 (m,
1 H, CH), 6.92–7.08 (m, 2 Harom), 7.93–8.07 (m, 2 Harom), 9.25 (br, 1 H, NH)
65–67
C13H18NOPS3 77.96, 76.85 0.89 (t, 3 H, 3JH-H = 6.89, CH3), 1.21–1.57 (m, 4 H, CH2CH2), 1.87–2.31 (m, 2 H,
CH2), 3.81 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 4.44–4.68 (m, 1 H, CH), 6.94–7.02 (m, 2 Harom), 7.80–
7.92 (m, 2 Harom), 9.20 (br, 1 H, NH)
a FT IR (KBr, cm–1) of compound 2a: 3307(νN–H),1589,1495, 1457 (νAr), 1438, 1260 (νC=S), 1102 (νAr–O–C); 2d: 3425 (νN–H), 1597, 1572, 1502,
1460 (νAr), 1440, 1257 (νC=S), 1128 (νAr–O–C); 2e: 3097 (νN–H), 1590, 1567, 1497, 1466 (νAr), 1414, 1258 (νC=S), 1102 (νAr–O–C); 2f: 3377
(νN–H), 1595, 1570, 1500, 1458 (νAr), 1406, 1255 (νC=S), 1107 (νAr–O–C). EI-MS data of compound 2b: m/z (%) = 317 (M+, 80) 284 (90) 203 (100)
171 (68) 139 (71) 108 (66) 82 (46) 63 (63). 2c: 331 (M+, 75) 298 (78) 289 (39) 203 (100) 171 (70) 139 (25) 128 (86) 108 (82) 63 (77).
b Yield of pure isolated product.
c Satisfactory microanalyses obtained: C±0.4; H±0.4; N±0.4
d The diastereoisomer excess of 2e and 2f based on their 31P NMR spectra are 17% and 22%, respectively.
Synthesis 2002, No. 17, 2527–2531 ISSN 0039-7881 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York