10.1002/anie.201709167
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
Cammarota, L. J. Clouston, C. C. Lu, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 334,
100-111; c) I. G. Powers, C. Uyeda, ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 936-958; d) D.
R. Pye, N. P. Mankad, Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 1705-1718; e) J. P.
Krogman, C. M. Thomas, Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 5115-5127; f) J. K.
Bera, K. R. Dunbar, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4453-4457;
Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 4633-4637.
Not only chain growth, but also chain shortening can be
achieved in a selective manner. Thus, switching to a different
solvent also leads to reversible transformations between the
tetra- and trinuclear Cu core. Dissolving isolated 4a·BArF in
2
CD3CN led to exclusive formation of 3a·BArF, confirmed by NMR
and UV/Vis, with [Cu(MeCN)4]BArF likely being a by-product
(Scheme 2, step E). Reversely, evaporation of the resulting
CD3CN solution and redissolving the solid product in THF again
[2]
[3]
[4]
a) M. R. Mian, H. Iguchi, S. Takaishi, H. Murasugi, T. Miyamoto, H.
Okamoto, H. Tanaka, S.-i. Kuroda, B. K. Breedlove, M. Yamashita, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 6562-6565; b) J. F. Berry, in Multiple
Bonds between Metal Atoms, 3rd Ed. (Eds.: F. A. Cotton, C. A. Murillo,
R. A. Walton), Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005, pp. 669-706.
a) J. F. Berry, F. A. Cotton, P. Lei, C. A. Murillo, Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42,
377-382; b) G. J. Pyrka, M. El-Mekki, A. A. Pinkerton, J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1991, 84-85; c) L. P. Wu, P. Field, T. Morrissey, C.
Murphy, P. Nagle, B. Hathaway, C. Simmons, P. Thornton, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans. 1990, 3835-3840.
leads to formation of 4a·BArF Moreover, Cu atoms can be
2.
removed via chemical reduction. Thus, treating 3a·BArF and
3b·BF4 with 1.2 equiv of cobaltocene Cp2Co led to precipitation
of metallic copper and selective formation of the corresponding
binuclear complexes 2a and 2b as the only products present in
solution in 50% and 72% yields, respectively (Scheme 2, step F).
To our knowledge, this is the first example for a controlled
stepwise formation of multimetalic linear chains varying from one
to four metal atoms with high selectivity and reversibility.
a) E. Cariati, E. Lucenti, C. Botta, U. Giovanella, D. Marinotto, S.
Righetto, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 306, 566-614; b) V. Wing-Wah Yam,
K. Kam-Wing Lo, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1999, 28, 323-334.
[5]
[6]
A. Grodzicki, I. Lakomska, P. Piszczek, I. Szymanska, E. Szlyk, Coord.
Chem. Rev. 2005, 249, 2232-2258.
In conclusion, we developed dynamic unsymmetrical ligand
scaffolds L1 and L2 that allow for selective and reversible
rearrangement di-, tri- and tetranuclear Cu chain complexes.
This is enabled by stepwise “sliding” of the bridging fragment
along the metal chain. By contrast to previously reported
examples where ligand design specific to each chain length is
required, the same ligand can support a variety of chain lengths,
depending on solvent polarity and stoichiometry. This is a rare
example of a stepwise selective chain growth in a linear metal
chain compound. Such ligand design can be useful in
developing applications of multicopper complexes as flexible
supramolecular building blocks and switches of variable metal
chain length in a simple and selective manner. The principle of
ligand design described in this work can potentially be expanded
to support polynuclear systems that include various kinds of
metal centers by modification of the capping chelating group to
include soft or hard donors of suitable geometry, or by
modification of the heterocyclic framework. Moreover, stepwise
formation of polymetallic species in combination with careful
adjustment of the capping fragment coordination properties may
enable selective formation of heterobimetallic complexes that
selectively incorporate two kinds of metals in the terminal and in
the central positions, an area we are currently investigating.
G. Schmid, J. H. Wemken, A. Maltenberger, C. Diez, A. Jaeger, T.
Dobbertin, O. Hietsoi, C. Dubceac, M. A. Petrukhina, Adv. Mater. 2014,
26, 878-885.
[7]
[8]
G. Li, H. Liu, X. Chen, L. Zhang, Y. Bu, J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115,
2855-2864.
a) O. Hietsoi, A. S. Filatov, C. Dubceac, M. A. Petrukhina, Coord. Chem.
Rev. 2015, 295, 125-138; b) O. Hietsoi, A. S. Filatov, C. Dubceac, M. A.
Petrukhina, Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 8598-8603; c) O. Hietsoi, C.
Dubceac, A. S. Filatov, M. A. Petrukhina, Chem. Commun. 2011, 47,
6939-6941.
[9]
a) J.-F. Liu, X. Min, J.-Y. Lv, F.-X. Pan, Q.-J. Pan, Z.-M. Sun, Inorg.
Chem. 2014, 53, 11068-11074; b) T. C. Davenport, T. D. Tilley, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 12205-12208; Angew. Chem. 2011, 123,
12413-12416; c) K. Mashima, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2010, 83, 299-312;
d) I. P.-C. Liu, W.-Z. Wang, S.-M. Peng, Chem. Commun. 2009, 4323-
4331; e) Y. Takemura, T. Nakajima, T. Tanase, Dalton Trans. 2009,
10231-10243.
[10] a) P. Ai, A. A. Danopoulos, P. Braunstein, K. Y. Monakhov, Chem.
Commun. 2014, 50, 103-105; b) X. He, K. Ruhlandt-Senge, P. P.
Power, S. H. Bertz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 6963-6964; c) M. S.
Tsai, S. M. Peng, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1991, 514-515; d) J.
Beck, J. Straehle, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1985, 24, 409-410; Angew.
Chem. 1985, 97, 419-420.
[11] a) C. Kraemer, S. Leingang, O. Huebner, E. Kaifer, H. Wadepohl, H.-J.
Himmel, Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 16966-16983; b) B. Liu, S. Pan, B. Liu,
W. Chen, Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 10485-10497; c) N. Zhao, J. Zhang, Y.
Yang, H. Zhu, Y. Li, G. Fu, Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 8710-8718; d) Y.
Chen, J.-L. Li, G. S. M. Tong, W. Lu, W.-F. Fu, S.-W. Lai, C.-M. Che,
Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 1509-1514; e) Z.-K. Chan, Y.-Y. Wu, J.-D. Chen,
C.-Y. Yeh, C.-C. Wang, Y.-F. Tsai, J.-C. Wang, Dalton Trans. 2005,
985-990; f) R. Clerac, F. A. Cotton, L. M. Daniels, J. Gu, C. A. Murillo,
H.-C. Zhou, Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 4488-4493.
Acknowledgements
O.R.-W. is a JSPS International Research Fellow. The authors
thank Mr. A. Villar-Briones and Dr. M. Roy for performing HR-MS
analysis and acknowledge OIST for full funding of the project.
J.L-S. acknowledges the use of computational facilities of the
the supercomputing center of Galicia (CESGA) and of the
Centro de Servicios de Informática y Redes de Comunicaciones
(CSIRC) of the Universidad de Granada (UGR).
[12] M. Stollenz, J. E. Raymond, L. M. Perez, J. Wiederkehr, N. Bhuvanesh,
Chem. - Eur. J. 2016, 22, 2396-2405.
[13] a) A. S. Filatov, O. Hietsoi, Y. Sevryugina, N. N. Gerasimchuk, M. A.
Petrukhina, Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 1626-1633; b) Y. Takemura, T.
Nakajima, T. Tanase, M. Usuki, H. Takenaka, E. Goto, M. Mikuriya,
Chem. Commun. 2009, 1664-1666; c) A. Venturelli, T. B. Rauchfuss, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 4824-4831.
Keywords: copper • chain structures • ligand design • reversible
[14] CCDC 1571963 (1a), 1571964 (1b), 1571965 (2a), 1572036 (2b),
1571966 (2b'), 1571967 (3a·BArF), 1571968 (3a·BF4), 1571970
(3b·BArF), 1571971 (3b·BF4), and 1571972 (4a·BArF2) contain the
supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are
provided free of charge by The Cambridge Crystallographic Data
Centre.
interconversion • stepwise growth
[1]
a) T. G. Gray, J. P. Sadighi, in Molecular Metal-Metal Bonds (Ed.: S. T.
Liddle), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2015, pp. 397-428; b) R. C.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.