A. M. Zawisza, S. Bouquillon, J. Muzart
FULL PAPER
tion. This solvent effect on the selectivity differs strongly Acknowledgments
0
[4]
from the one previously observed under Pd catalysis
We are grateful to CNRS for a temporary position to A. M. Z.
since (1) in THF, Pd(PPh ) leads to the exclusive or almost
3
4
exclusive isomerization of 1 into 2, while PdCl (MeCN)2
2
[
1] J. Tsuji, Palladium Reagents and Catalysts, Wiley, Chichester,
995, p. 399–402.
2] L. E. Overman, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 579–
86.
The differences in the conversion rates with the nature of [3] E. Curzon, B. T. Golding, C. Pierpoint, B. W. Waters, J. Or-
affords a ca. 2:1 mixture of 2 and 3 and (2) in DMF, both
PdCl (MeCN) and Pd(PPh ) lead to 2 and 3 from 1, but
1
2
2
3 4
[
II
the formation of 2 is more privileged by the Pd catalyst.
5
the solvent (Figure 1) can also be explained by the differ-
ences in the solvation of the ionic intermediates that are
more stabilized in DMF than in THF, and, consequently,
they should evolve more slowly towards the products.
ganomet. Chem. 1984, 262, 263–269.
[
[
[
[
4] S. Bouquillon, J. Muzart, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 3301–3305.
5] P. M. Henry, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1971, 328–329.
6] P. M. Henry, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 5200–5206.
7] M. M. L. Crilley, B. T. Golding, C. Pierpoint, J. Chem. Soc.
Perkin Trans. 1 1988, 2061–2067.
[
[
[
8] L. E. Overman, F. M. Knoll, Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 20, 321–
324.
9] A. C. Oehlschlager, P. Mishra, S. Dhami, Can. J. Chem. 1984,
62, 791–797.
10] a) S. Saito, S. Hamano, H. Moriyama, K. Okada, T. Moriwake,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 1157–1160; b) S. Saito, A. Kuroda,
H. Matsunaga, S. Ikeda, Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 13919–13932.
11] X. Ariza, N. Fernández, J. Garcia, M. López, L. Montserrat,
J. Ortiz, Synthesis 2004, 128–134.
12] W. Kitching, Z. Rappoport, S. Winstein, W. G. Young, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 2054–2055.
[
[
[
[
13] K. Dunne, F. J. McQuillin, J. Chem. Soc. (C) 1970, 2200–2203.
14] X. Ariza, J. Garcia, Y. Georges, M. Vicente, Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 4501–4504.
[
[
15] P. M. Henry, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 7316–7322.
16] a) J. Muzart, A. Riahi, J. P. Pète, J. Organomet. Chem. 1985,
Figure 4. Influence of the solvent and the conversion on the ratio
of diacetates 2 and 3 obtained from 1.
2
80, 269–279; b) R. K. Boeckman, S. W. Goldstein, M. A. Wal-
ters, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 8250–8252.
ˇ
[
17] R. Ponec, R. Re rˇ icha, J. Organomet. Chem. 1988, 341, 549–
57.
18] R. G. F. Giles, V. R. Lee Son, M. V. Sargent, Aust. J. Chem.
990, 43, 777–781.
[19] J. Yu, M. J. Gaunt, J. B. Spencer, J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 4627–
629.
5
[
1
Experimental Section
4
General: THF was distilled from sodium/benzophenone under an
[20] In fact, such a possibility was previously eliminated by Henry
but under different experimental conditions.[
15]
argon atmosphere. Diacetates 1, 2, and 3 and PdCl
2
(MeCN)
2
were
prepared as previously reported.[
4,31]
[21] C. Moberg, L. Sutin, I. Csöregh, A. Heumann, Organometal-
lics 1990, 9, 974–980.
NMR spectra were obtained
with a Bruker AC 250 spectrometer. GC analysis were performed
with an HP6890 apparatus equipped with DB1 capillary column
[
22] S. Strömberg, M. Svensson, K. Zetterberg, Organometallics
997, 16, 3165–3168.
1
(length: 25 m, diameter: 0.32 m) and an HP 3395 integrator.
[
23] Even in the presence of chloride, cis chloropalladation of al-
kenes is more important than trans chloropalladation: P. M.
Henry, J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 2443–2447. For an explanation
General Isomerization Procedure and Determination of the Acetate
Ratios: To a solution of 1, 2, or 3 (700 mg, 4.07 mmol) in dry THF
or DMF (15 mL) under an atmosphere of argon was added
PdCl (MeCN) (52.8 mg, 0.05 equiv.), and the mixture was warmed
2 2
in a bath heated at 70–72 °C. Samples were removed from the reac-
2 2
of trans chloropalladation with PdCl (PhCN) in the absence
of added chloride, see W. T. Wipke, G. L. Goeke, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1974, 96, 4244–4249.
[24] a) A. Sen, T.-W. Lai, Inorg. Chem. 1981, 20, 4036–4038; b) A.
tion mixture at the times mentioned in the tables, filtered through
Sen, T.-W. Lai, Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 3257–3258.
1
Celite, and then analyzed by GC. H NMR spectroscopic analyses
[25] B. M. Trost, C. B. Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3687–
3696.
were carried out after evaporation of the solvent followed by dissol-
ution of the residues in CDCl
3
.
[26] C. Reichardt, Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemis-
try, 2nd ed., VCH, Weinheim, 1988, p. 339–413.
GC analysis: Gas: nitrogen (4 bar); injector and detector tempera-
tures: 250 °C; oven temperature: 70 °C for 5 min, then 2 °C/min till
[
27] C. Reichardt, Org. Process Res. Dev. 2007, 11, 105–113.
[28] B. T. Golding, C. Pierpoint, R. Aneja, J. Chem. Soc. Chem.
Commun. 1981, 1030–1031.
2
4
00 °C; internal standard: nonane; retention times, nonane:
.67 min, 3: 10.08 min, 1: 16.12 min, 2: 17.08 min.
[29] For scales of solvent polarity, see:a) ref.[26]; b) J. March, Ad-
vanced Organic Chemistry, 4th ed., John Wiley & Sons, New
York, 1992, pp. 360–362.
1H NMR spectroscopic analysis: The ratios between the different
acetates were established from the respective integrations of the
CH of 1 (δ = 4.62 ppm) and 2 (δ = 4.58 ppm), and the CH proton
2
[30] C. Amatore, A. Jutand, G. Meyer, L. Mottier, Chem. Eur. J.
1999, 5, 466–473.
of 3 (δ = 5.74 ppm); the precision of the integrations was estimated
to beϮ3%.
[31] L. S. Hegedus, O. P. Anderson, K. Zetterberg, G. Allen, K. Sii-
rala-Hansen, D. J. Olsen, A. B. Packard, Inorg. Chem. 1977, 16,
1887–1894.
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
Received: March 20, 2007
cle): Tables S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5.
Published Online: June 18, 2007
3904
www.eurjoc.org
© 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 3901–3904