2346 Patil et al.
Asian J. Chem.
TABLE-4
COMPARISON OF RESULTS USING (H3PO4·SiO2) CATALYST WITH RESULTS OBTAINED BY OTHER WORKERS
S. No.
Catalyst
(H3PO4·SiO2)
InCl3·4H2O
Reaction conditions
Ethanol, reflux
Ionic liquid/80 °C
EtOH (reflux)
CH3CN (reflux)
CH3CN (reflux)
Time (min)
30-80
240-600
360
Yield (%)
85-94
76-95
84-96
90-98
Ref.
This work
[2288]
1
2
3
4
5
Fe3+-montmorillonite
NaHSO4-SiO2
Amberlyst-15
[2299]
[1188]
[16]
16
360
300
90-96
3. A. Ilangovan, S. Muralidharan, P. Sakthivel, S. Malayappasamy, S.
Karuppusamy and M.P. Kaushik, Tetrahedron Lett., 54, 491 (2013);
afforded 91 % yield of the corresponding product (Table-2
entry 2).All the reactions were monitored by TLC. The synthe-
sized compounds were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR
and DEPT-135 spectral techniques. Further structures of com-
pounds were confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy.
4.
E. Mosaddegh, M.R. Islami andA. Hassankhani, Arab. J. Chem., 5, 77 (2012);
5. S. Hatakeyama, N. Ochi, H. Numata and S. Takano, J. Chem. Soc. Chem.
Commun., 0, 1202 (1988);
In order to check usefulness of the catalyst for commercial
applications, reusability of the catalyst was also investigated
for model reaction (Table-3).After completion of the reaction,
the reaction mixture was isolated with CH2Cl2. The catalyst
was easily recovered by filtration after washing with ethyl acetate
and drying at 80 °C. The recycled catalyst was used for the next.
The decrease in product yield after 4th cycle could be due to
leaching of the catalyst. Thus catalyst, (H3PO4·SiO2) could be
reused four times without any loss of its activity.
6. A. Thakur,A. Sharma andA. Sharma, Synth. Commun., 46, 1766 (2016);
7. O. Sirkecioglu, N. Talinli, A. Akar, M. Ahmad, T.A. King, D.K. Ko, B.H.
Cha and J. Lee, J. Chem. Res. (S)., 35, 502 (1995).
8. M. Ahmad, T.A. King, D.K. Ko, B.H. Cha and J. Lee, J. Phys. D Appl.
Phys., 35, 1473 (2002);
9. J.F. Callan, P. De Silva and D.C. Magri, Tetrahedron, 61, 8551 (2005);
10. Z.-H. Zhang and X.-Y. Tao, Aust. J. Chem., 61, 77 (2008);
11. A. Pramanik and S. Bhar, Catal. Commun., 20, 17 (2012);
12. E.C. Horning and M.G. Horning, J. Org. Chem., 11, 95 (1946);
13. T.S. Jin, J.S. Zhang,A.Q.Wang and T.S. Li, Synth. Commun., 35, 2339 (2005);
14. A. John, P.J.P.Yadav and S. Palaniappan, J. Mol. Catal. A, 248, 121 (2006);
TABLE-3
REUSABILITY OF THE CATALYSTa
Run
Yieldb
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
84
94
92
91
89
aReaction conditions: Aromatic aldehyde (1 mmol), dimedone (2
mmol) H3PO4·SiO2 (30 mg), ethanol (2 mL), reflux time: 30 min.
bIsolated yield
15. S. Kantevari, R. Bantu and L. Nagarapu, J. Mol. Catal. Chem., 269, 53 (2007);
16. B. Das, P. Thirupathi, I. Mahender, V.S. Reddy and Y.K. Rao, J. Mol.
Catal. Chem., 247, 233 (2006);
17. G. Song, B. Wang, H. Luo and L.Yang, Catal. Commun., 8, 673 (2007);
The catalytic activity of our catalyst is compared with earlier
reported catalyst for synthesis of xanthenedione (Table-4). The
catalyst reported in this work is simple, more efficient and
less time consuming compared with other reported catalysts.
18. B. Das, P. Thirupathi, K.R. Reddy, B. Ravikanth and L. Nagarapu, Catal.
Conclusion
Commun., 8, 535 (2007);
19. H.A. Oskooie, L. Tahershamsi, M.M. Heravi and B. Baghernejad, E-J.
Chem., 7, 717 (2010);
20. X. Fan, X. Hu, X. Zhang and J. Wang, Can. J. Chem., 83, 16 (2005);
In summary, the reported protocol is simple and effective
for the synthesis of various substituted and unsubstituted
xanthenediones. In addition to this, low-cost, easy availability,
recyclability, low toxicity, stability of the catalyst, excellent
yields of products and short reaction time make this protocol
a viable contribution to the existing processes.
21. .I. Shakibaei, P. Mirzaei andA. Bazgir,, Appl. Catal. A., 325, 188 (2007);
22. S. Kantevari, R. Bantu and L. Nagarapu, ARKIVOC, 136 (2006);
23. D. Fang, K. Gong and Z.-L. Liu, Catal. Lett., 127, 291 (2009);
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are thankful for Instrumentation Department,
Solapur University, Solapur, India for 1H NMR analysis.
24. M.M.Amini,Y. Fazaeli, Z.Yassaee, S. Feizi and A. Bazgir, Open Catal.
J., 2, 40 (2009);
25. A. Khan, T. Parvin and L. Choudhury, Synthesis, 2497 (2006);
26. A.D. Sawant, D.G. Raut, A.R. Deorukhkar, U.V. Desai and M.M.
Salunkhe, Green Chem. Lett. Rev., 4, 235 (2011);
27. A.N. Dadhania, V.K. Patel and D.K. Raval, J. Saudi Chem. Soc., 21,
S163 (2017);
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests
regarding the publication of this article.
REFERENCES
1. Q.-B. Han, N.-Y.Yang, H.-L. Tian, C.-F. Qiao, J.-Z. Song, D.C. Chang,
S.-L. Chen, K.Q. Luo and H.-X. Xu, Phytochemistry, 69, 2187 (2008);
2. N. Mulakayala, P.V.N.S. Murthy, D. Rambabu, M. Aeluri, R. Adepu, G.R.
Krishna, C.M. Reddy, K.R.S. Prasad, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 22,
2186 (2012);
28. J.P. Poupelin, G. Saint-Rut, O. Fussard-Blanpin, G. Narcisse, G. Uchida-
Ernouf and R. Lacroix, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 13, 67 (1978).
29. A. Sharifi, M.S. Abaee, A. Tavakkoli, M. Mirzaei and A. Zolfaghari,
Synth. Commun., 38, 2958 (2008);