LETTER
Novel and Efficient Synthesis of Symmetrical Functionalized Biaryls
879
the starting material was recovered quantitatively. This
result reveals two important facts; i) the mechanism of
coupling does not proceed via the formation of radical
anion {[C6H5X]–} as the aryl halides are effective electron
acceptors in the presence of donors such as alkali metals,
carbanions, and various organometals to form radical an-
ions.13e,14 ii) the coupling does not involve the initial in
situ formation of aryl zinc halide intermediate.15 A plausi-
ble mechanism of the zinc/triethylammonium formate
promoted reductive homocoupling reaction of aryl halides
is shown in Scheme 2. The initial step in the homo-
coupling reaction would be the formation of zinc hydride
(ZnH–) species by the reaction of Zn(0) with HCOO–.16
Addition of aryl halide Ar-X in the presence of HNEt3+ to
thus formed ZnH– could form Ar-Zn-H. Subsequent reac-
tion of aryl zinc hydride Ar-Zn-H with Ar-X would afford
Ar-Zn-Ar. Finally, reductive elimination of Ar-Zn-Ar
would produce biaryl Ar-Ar and Zn(0) to complete the
catalytic cycle.17 The exact role played by the base in this
system is unclear. Addition of base may facilitate the
coupling reaction by neutralizing the acid produced in the
reduction cycle.
References
(1) (a) Yamamoto, T.; Maruyama, T.; Zhou, Z.; Ito, T.; Fukada,
T.; Yoneda, Y.; Begum, F.; Ikeda, T.; Sasaki, S.; Takezoe,
H.; Fukada, A.; Kubota, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
4832. (b) Schulz, E.; Fahmi, K.; Lemaire, M. Acros Org.
Acta 1995, 1, 10. (c) Zhu, S. S.; Swager, T. M. Adv. Mater.
1996, 8, 497. (d) Papilon, J.; Schulz, E.; Gelinas, S.;
Lessard, J.; Lemaire, M. Synth. Metals 1998, 96, 155.
(2) Bringmann, G.; Walter, R.; Weirich, R. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1990, 29, 977.
(3) Supramolecular Chemistry, 1st ed.; Lehn, J. M., Ed.; VCH
Verlagsgesellschaft: Weinheim, Germany, 1995.
(4) Chao, Y.; Weisman, G. R.; Sogah, G. D. Y.; Cram, D. J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 515.
(5) Hassan, J.; Sevignon, M.; Gozzi, C.; Schulz, E.; Lemaire, M.
Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 1359.
(6) (a) Miyaura, N.; Yanagi, T.; Suzuki, A. Synth. Commun.
1981, 11, 513. (b) Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. Rev. 1995,
95, 2457. (c) Basu, B.; Das, P.; Bhuiyan, M. M. H.; Jha, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 3817; and references cited
therein.
(7) Wallow, T. I.; Norak, B. M. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5034.
(8) (a) Stanforth, S. P. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 263. (b) Miller, J.
A.; Farrell, R. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 6441.
(9) (a) Bumagin, N. A.; Luzikova, E. V. J. Organomet. Chem.
1997, 532, 271. (b) Fechtenkotter, A.; Saalwachter, K.;
Harbison, M. A.; Mullen, K.; Spiess, H. W. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3039.
(10) (a) Ullmann, F.; Bielecki, J. Chem. Ber. 1901, 34, 2174.
(b) Fanta, P. E. Synthesis 1974, 1, 9. (c) Sainsbury, M.
Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 3327.
(11) (a) Kende, A. S.; Liebeskind, L. S.; Braitsch, D. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 3375. (b) Zembayashi, M.; Tamao,
K.; Yoshida, J.; Kumuda, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 4089.
(c) Iyoda, M.; Otsuka, H.; Sato, K.; Nisato, N.; Oda, M. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1990, 63, 80. (d) Howarth, J.; James, P.;
Dai, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 10319.
(e) Venkatraman, S.; Li, C.-J. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1133.
(f) Mukhopadhyay, S.; Rothenberg, G.; Gitis, D.; Sasson, Y.
Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 211.
(12) Bamfield, P.; Quan, P. M. Synthesis 1978, 537.
(13) (a) Hassan, J.; Penalva, V.; Lavenot, L.; Gozzi, C.; Lemaire,
M. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 13793. (b) Penalva, V.; Hassan,
J.; Lavenot, L.; Gozzi, C.; Lemaire, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 2559. (c) Hennings, D. D.; Iwama, T.; Rawel, V.
H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1205. (d) Mukhopadhyay, S.;
Rothenberg, G.; Wiener, H.; Sasson, Y. Tetrahedron 1999,
55, 14763. (e) Mukhopadhyay, S.; Rothenberg, G.; Gitis, D.;
Wiener, H.; Sasson, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1999,
2481. (f) Hassan, J.; Hathroubi, C.; Gozzi, C.; Lemaire, M.
Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 7845. (g) Kuroboshi, M.; Waki, Y.;
Tanaka, H. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3938.
(14) (a) Morell, D. G.; Kochi, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97,
7262. (b) Tsou, T. T.; Kochi, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979,
101, 6319.
(15) Tucker, C. E.; Majid, T. N.; Knochel, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 3983.
Scheme 2 A Plausible mechanism of the zinc/triethylammonium
formate promoted reductive homocoupling of aryl halides
In conclusion, the triethylammonium formate mediated
synthesis of symmetrical functionalized biaryls via reduc-
tive homocoupling of aryl halides can be achieved in the
presence of commercial zinc dust. In the zinc/triethylam-
monium formate system, the coupling of aryl halides pro-
ceeds efficiently to furnish corresponding biaryls in high
yields and the competitive reduction reaction (hydrodeha-
logenation) is less probable. Moreover zinc dust is inex-
pensive, widely available and can be used without any
expensive auxiliary catalysts such as palladium and/or
nickel. The ease of product separation, safe reaction me-
dium, high selectivity and low cost of the reagents pro-
mote this method as a promising alternative to other
existing transition metal catalyzed coupling techniques.
(16) For Pd/sodium formate-promoted reductive homocoupling,
initial formation of PdH-species was proposed as a plausible
mechanism, see: Rajgopal, S.; Anwer, M. K.; Spatola, A. F.
In Peptides: Design, Synthesis, and Biological Activity;
Basava, C.; Anantharamaiah, G. M., Eds.; Birkhauser:
Boston, 1994, 11.
Acknowledgment
(17) For zinc/nickel catalyst-promoted reaction, reductive
elimination of Ar2Ni affording Ar2 was proposed as a
plausible mechanism.11
(18) The spectra were compared to those of a commercial sample.
(19) Jutand, A.; Mosleh, A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 261.
We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the University
Grants Commission, New Delhi, India. K. A. is also thankful to
the Lady Tata Memorial Trust, Mumbai, India for a research
fellowship.
Synlett 2004, No. 5, 877–879 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York