4
910
J . Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4910-4911
An om a lou s P r od u cts fr om In tr a m olecu la r
In ser tion Rea ction s of Rh od iu m
Ca r ben oid s in to th e r-C-H Bon d s of Eth er s
In order to identify the factors that influence the
outcome of the intramolecular insertion reactions of
carbenoids into the C-H bonds of allylic ethers, reactions
of the R-diazo ketone 4 were investigated (eq 2). These
reactions were performed using seven structurally di-
verse rhodium complexes as catalysts.10 Analysis of the
reaction mixtures by GC revealed that the cyclopropane
J . Stephen Clark* and Alexander G. Dossetter
Department of Chemistry, University of Nottingham,
University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
5
was the major product in all cases and that varying
amounts of the expected 3(2H)-furanone 6 were also
produced (Table 1). In addition to the expected products
C. Adam Russell and William G. Whittingham
ZENECA Agrochemicals, J ealott’s Hill Research Station,
Bracknell, Berkshire RG42 6ET, United Kingdom
(5 and 6), significant amounts of a nonpolar product were
also detected. Although this product proved to be too
unstable to isolate and fully characterize, it was identified
as the acetal 7 on the basis of NMR analysis of partially
purified material. The acetal 7 is a very unusual product,
and as far as we are aware, there is no literature
precedent for the isolation of analogous products from
the C-H insertion reactions of metal carbenoids. How-
ever, in previous studies, one of us isolated a similar
product upon cyclization of a substrate related to the
R-diazo ketone 1.11
When electron-rich rhodium complexes were used to
catalyze the reaction (entries 1-3 and 6, Table 1), the
relative amounts of the anomalous product 7 and the
3(2H)-furanone 6 produced in each reaction were similar.
However, when complexes bearing electron-withdrawing
ligands were employed as catalysts (entries 4, 5, and 7,
Table 1) there was a significant increase in the relative
amount of the acetal 7 produced.
Received May 12, 1997
Intramolecular C-H insertion reactions of metal car-
benoids are well known and have been widely used for
the stereoselective construction of cyclopentanones, γ-lac-
tones, and lactams.1 The development of asymmetric
variants of these reactions by Doyle and others has
further extended their scope.3 Recently, Adams and co-
workers demonstrated that the intramolecular insertion
reaction of a metal carbenoid into a C-H bond adjacent
to an ether oxygen can be used for the stereoselective
construction of 3(2H)-furanones.5 This reaction has been
adapted for the synthesis of tetrahydrofurans from diazo
esters by Taber.6 In addition, Lee has shown that the
insertion of a carbenoid into a C-H bond adjacent to a
silyl ether is especially favorable.7
,2
,4
In the course of our studies directed toward the
8
synthesis of neoliacinic acid, we prepared the 3(2H)-
The Rh
2 2 3 4
(O CCH ) -catalyzed reactions of two other
furanone 2 from the R-diazo ketone 1 by generation and
subsequent intramolecular insertion of a rhodium car-
benoid into the C-H bond of an allylic ether (eq 1).
allylic ethers (8a and 8b) were also investigated (eq 3).
Although the yield for this transformation was reason-
able, cyclopropanation was a significant competing pro-
cess.2 In an attempt to improve the selectivity for C-H
insertion, we explored the cyclization reactions of some
simple substrates related to 1.
These substrates were selected in order to explore the
influence that alkene substituents have on the relative
rates of cyclopropanation and C-H insertion, and on the
amount of the anomalous C-H insertion product ob-
tained. Cyclopropanation was the predominant reaction
of both substrates, and the isolated ratio of cyclopropa-
nation product to C-H insertion products was insensitive
to the substitution pattern of the alkene. Treatment of
,9
(
1) For the first examples of intramolecular C-H insertion of metal
carbenoids to give cyclopentanones, see: (a) Wenkert, E.; Davis, L. L.;
Mylari, B. L.; Solomon, M. F.; da Silva, R. R.; Shulman, S.; Warnet,
R. J .; Ceccherelli, P.; Curini, M.; Pellicciari, R. J . Org. Chem. 1982,
4
7, 3242. (b) Taber, D. F.; Petty, E. H. J . Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 4808.
the R-diazo ketone 8a with Rh
2 2 3 4
(O CCH ) afforded the
(
2) For reviews concerning the C-H insertion reactions of metal
acetal 11a as the major C-H insertion product along
with some of the aldehyde resulting from decomposition
of this acetal. In contrast, the rhodium-catalyzed reac-
tion of the substrate 8b produced the 3(2H)-furanone 10a
as the major C-H insertion product. The result obtained
carbenoids, see: (a) Taber, D. F. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis;
Pattenden, G., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 3, Chapter
4
.2, p 1045. (b) Ye, T.; McKervey, M. A. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 1091. (c)
Doyle, M. P. In Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry II; Hegedus,
L. S., Ed.; Pergamon Press: New York, 1995; Vol. 12, Chapter 5.2, p
4
21.
2 2 3 4
upon cyclization of the substrate 4 using Rh (O CCH )
as the catalyst is also informative (entry 1, Table 1).
These results demonstrate that the presence of alkyl
(3) Doyle, M. P. Aldrichim. Acta 1996, 29, 3 and references therein.
4) (a) McCarthy, N.; McKervey, M. A.; Ye, T.; McCann, M.; Murphy,
(
E.; Doyle, M. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 5983. (b) M u¨ ller, P.;
Polleux, P. Helv. Chim. Acta 1994, 77, 645. (c) Watanabe, N.; Ohtake,
Y.; Hashimoto, S.; Shiro, M.; Ikegami, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36,
1
491.
5) Adams, J .; Poupart, M.-A.; Grenier, L.; Schaller, C.; Ouimet, N.;
Frenette, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 1749.
(10) The complexes Rh
CCF are commercially available. For the preparation of the other
catalysts used, see: (a) Hashimoto, S.; Watanabe, N.; Ikegami, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 2709 [Rh (O CCPh ]. (b) Drago, R. S.;
Long, J . R.; Cosmano, R. Inorg. Chem. 1982, 21, 2196 [Rh (O CC ].
(c) Doyle, M. P.; Bagheri, V.; Wandless, T. J .; Harn, N. K.; Brinker, D.
A.; Eagle, C. T.; Loh, K.-L. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 1906 [Rh
(NHCOCH ]. (d) Dennis, A. M.; Korp, J . D.; Bernal, I.; Howard, R.
2 2 3 4 2 2 7 15 4 2 2
(O CCH ) , Rh (O CC H ) , and Rh (O -
(
3 4
)
(
6) Taber, D. F.; Song.Y. J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6706.
2
2
3 4
)
(7) Lee, E.; Choi, I.; Song, S. Y. J . Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995,
2
2
3 7 4
F )
3
21.
8) Clark, J . S.; Dossetter, A. G.; Whittingham, W. G. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1996, 37, 5605.
9) Ceccherelli, P.; Curini, M.; Marcotullio, M. C.; Rosati, O.
Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 9767.
(
2
-
3 4
)
(
2 3 4
A.; Bear, J . L. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 1522 [Rh (NHCOCF ) ].
(11) Russell, C. A. Unpublished results.
S0022-3263(97)00842-6 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society