G. Romanelli et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 398 (2015) 11–16
13
2.3. Characterization methods
(1 M, 2 × 7 mL), NaOH (1 M, 2 × 7 mL), saturated solution of NaCl
(10 mL), H2O (10 mL), dried (anhydrous Na2SO4), and concentrated.
The crude product was crystallized from hexanes. The crystals were
recovered by filtration, washed with hexanes, and dried to give 35%
yield, mp 46–47 ◦C, lit1 47 ◦C. 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) ı = 7.36 (dd,
J = 8 Hz, J = 2 Hz, 1 H), 7.24 (d, J = 2 Hz, 1 H), 6.80 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1 H), 6.31
(d, J = 10 Hz, 1 H), 5.72 (d, J = 10 Hz, 1 H), and 1.46 (s, 6H). 13C NMR
(50 MHz, CDCl3) ı = 156.7, 133.3, 132.2, 130.2, 121.5, 120.6, 119.1,
117.2, 103.5, 77.8, and 28.2.
Complete characterization of the catalysts PMo11
V and
Py3–PMo11V was reported in a previous work [17,18]. Here, we
present some relevant analysis of the catalysts in order to verify
their characteristics. PMo11V and Py3–PMo11V were characterized
with a Philips 505 scanning electron microscope (SEM) using an
accelerating voltage of 15 eV solid. The catalysts were also ana-
lyzed by 31P MAS NMR in Varian Mercury Plus 300 equipment; the
measurements were carried out at room temperature using 85 wt%
H3PO4 as external reference. The FTIR spectra at room temperature
in the 400–4000 cm−1 range were obtained in a Thermo Nicolet
IR200 equipment diluting the solid samples in KBR. The acidity
of a suspension of the catalysts in acetonitrile was determined by
means of potentiometric titration in a Metrohm 794 Basic Titrino
apparatus with a double junction electrode using a solution of n-
butylamine in acetonitrile (0.025 N); this methodology allows the
evaluation of the total number of acid sites and their acid strength.
R,R- and S,S-Jacobsen catalysts were characterized as previ-
ously described [13]. FTIR spectra were recorded from KBR powder
(1 wt%) using a Nicolet Avatar 330 FTIR spectrophotometer, and
UV–vis spectra on a Lambda 4 PerkinElmer spectrophotometer
with an integrating sphere using BaSO4 as standard. TGA was per-
formed on a TGA 2950 Thermal Analyzer at a heating rate of 5 K/min
from 300 to 1073 K under flowing air (100 mL/min).
2.4.4. Enantioselective epoxidation of 6-CN-2,2-DMB
The enantioselective epoxidation of 6-CN-2,2-DMB was carried
out following the procedure reported elsewhere [13,14]. Briefly,
20 mol% of S,S or R,R catalyst with 6-CN-2,2-DMB (0.0625 mmol)
as substrate and 0.1875 mmol of KHSO5 (Oxone® dissolved in 4 mL
H2O) as oxygen source were used. The catalyst and 6-CN-2,2-DMB
were dissolved in acetone (4 mL), and the reaction was initiated
by the stepwise addition of an aqueous KHSO5 solution, whereas,
the pH value of the reaction mixture was monitored and adjusted
to 8.0–8.5 by slow addition of aqueous 5 wt% NaHCO3 solution,
under continuous stirring. After complete addition of the aqueous
KHSO5 solution, magnetic stirring was stopped and the obtained
solid (catalyst and inorganic salts) was recovered by simple fil-
tration, and it was washed with enough water. The obtained dark
brown residue (recovered catalyst) was dissolved in 4 mL of acetone
and reused in a further reaction. The liquid phase separated from
the reaction system was extracted with CH2Cl2, the aqueous phase
was discarded, and the organic phase was washed and dried with
anhydrous sodium sulfate. The obtained mixture was concentrated
under vacuum and the product was analyzed by GC–MS. The effect
of 4-phenylpyridine N-oxide (4-PPNO, 0.0125 mmol) as additive,
and the reaction temperature were also evaluated.
2.4. Catalytic experiments
2.4.1. Reaction analysis for optimizing the synthesis of
1,1-diethoxy-3-methyl-2-butene and 6-CN-2,2-DMB
1,1-Diethoxy-3-methyl-2-butene was obtained from triethyl
orthoformate (1 mmol), 3-methyl-2-butenal (1 mmol), and abso-
lute ethanol (0.3 mL) at 20 ◦C; 6-CN-2,2-DMB was synthesized
with 1,1-diethoxy-3-methyl-2-butene (1.7 mmol), 4-cyanophenol
(1.3 mmol), and xylene (2 mL). About 5 mg were collected from the
reaction at fixed time intervals; the sample was diluted with 1 mL
of acetone, filtered, and the filtrate was analyzed by GC (Shimadzu
2014, with a 30 m × 0.32 mm SPB-1 capillary column).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Catalyst characterization
The synthesis and full characterization of the PMo11V and
Py3–PMo11V catalysts were reported in a previous work [17,18].
geneous distribution of V, Mo, and P according to the expected
percent atomic ratios. 31P MAS NMR results of PMo11V show only
a wide dissymmetric line at −3.20 ppm, which has been related
with the substitution of one Mo6+ atom by one V5+ atom in the
Keggin structure [15]. The FTIR spectrum of PMoV shows the main
bands at 1061 cm−1 with a shoulder at 1081 (P–Oa), 960 (Mo–Od),
866 (Mo–Ob–Mo), and 776 (Mo–Oc–Mo) cm−1 [15]. The FTIR spec-
tra of pyridinium salt (Py3–PMo11V) showed four peaks assigned
to a heteropolyacid Keggin structure and a shift of the character-
istic bands for pyridinium ion from 1440 cm−1 and 1380 cm−1 to
1533 cm−1 and 1483 cm−1, respectively, in good agreement with
ray diffraction patterns for PMo11V and Py3–PMo11V are similar to
those of Keggin commercial PMo structure, showing seven main
diffraction peaks at 8.1◦, 8.9◦, 9.3◦, 27.8◦, 28.8◦, and 28.2◦ corre-
sponding to a triclinic symmetry [20,21]. In regards to the acidic
properties, the heteropolyacid is a Brönsted acid, and PMoV dis-
plays very strong acid sites at 20 ◦C with a maximum acid strength
corresponding to an initial electrode potential of 978 mV, higher
than that obtained for the V-free sample (600 mV) [15]. When PMoV
is transformed into the Py3–PMo catalyst, the number of sites and
their acid strength decrease (initial electrode potential = 365 mV).
Chiral salen ligand and Mn(III) salen complexes were identified
according to previously reported characterization methods [13,14].
2.4.2. General procedure for the synthesis of
1,1-diethoxy-3-methyl-2-butene
PMo11V was used as catalyst in this preparation. Triethyl
orthoformate (18 mmol), 3-methyl-2-butenal (18 mmol), and the
catalyst (PMo11V, 1 mmol%) were added to absolute ethanol (5 mL)
at 20 ◦C. The progress of the reaction was monitored by thin layer
chromatography (TLC) and gas chromatography (GC) analyses.
After stirring for 1 h, the excess of ethanol was removed by evapo-
ration, and the resulting mixture was treated with toluene (10 mL);
finally, the catalyst was recovered by centrifugation and washing
with toluene (5 mL). The organic phase was dried on anhydrous
Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated to obtain the crude acetal. The
acetal was isolated as a clear, colorless liquid by vacuum distilla-
tion (89% yield, 116–119 ◦C at 170 mm Hg, and 117.0–118.5 ◦C at
171–172 mm Hg).
2.4.3. General procedure for the synthesis of 6-CN-2,2-DMB
Py3–PMo11
V was used as catalyst for the preparation of
6-CN-2,2-DMB. 1,1-Diethoxy-3-methyl-2-butene (17 mmol), 4-
cyanophenol (13 mmol), and the catalyst (Py3–PMo11V, 1 mmol%)
were added to p-xylene (20 mL) as solvent at 20 ◦C. The progress of
the reaction was monitored by TLC and GC analysis. The reaction
mixture was heated and stirred at 120 ◦C. After 6 h, the reaction
mixture was cooled down to room temperature. The clear, yellow
solution was diluted with p-xylene (10 mL) and the catalyst was
recovered by centrifugation, washed with p-xylene (5 mL), dried
in vacuum, and reused. The organic phases were washed with HCl