Job/Unit: I42158
/KAP1
Date: 23-06-14 17:25:16
Pages: 10
FULL PAPER
with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and penicillin (100 UmL–1) Dr. T. K. Paine, IACS, Kolkata for his valuable cooperation with
and streptomycin (100 μgmL–1) as antibiotics (Gibco) in 96-well
culture plates at 37 °C under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2
in a CO2 incubator (Forma, Thermo Scientific, USA). All experi-
ments were performed using cells from passage 15 or less.
mass spectral studies. The single-crystal X-ray facility of the De-
partment of Chemical Sciences, IISER Mohali is acknowledged for
the data collection. G. K. thanks the Council of Scientific and In-
dustrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi for a fellowship.
Cytotoxicity Assay (MTT Assay): The complex in the concentra-
tion range 50–500 μmmL–1 dissolved in DMSO was added to the
wells 24 h after seeding 5ϫ103 cells per well in fresh culture me-
dium (200 μL). A solution of DMSO was used as the solvent con-
trol. A miniaturized viability assay using MTT was carried out ac-
cording to the method described by Mosmann.[24] After 24 and
48 h, MTT solution (20 μL) [5 mgmL–1 in phosphate-buffered sa-
line (PBS)] was added to each well. The plates were then wrapped
with aluminum foil and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. The purple
formazan product was dissolved by the addition of DMSO
(100 μL) to each well. The absorbance was monitored at 570 nm
(measurement) and 630 nm (reference) with a 96-well plate reader
(Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Data were collected for three repli-
cates each and used to calculate the mean. The percentage inhibi-
tion was calculated, from this data, using the formula shown below.
[1] J. Reedijk, E. Bouwman, Bioinorganic Catalysis, 2nd ed. (Eds.:
J. Reedijk, E. Bouwman), Dekker, New York, 1993.
[2] S. J. Lippard, J. M. Berg, Principles of Bioinorganic Chemistry,
University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA, 1994.
[3] a) K. D. Karlin, Science 1993, 261, 701–708; b) D. E. Wilcox,
Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2435–2458; c) T. M. T. Hall, J. A. Porter,
P. A. Beachy, D. J. Leahy, Nature 1995, 378, 212–216.
[4] a) T. W. Reid, I. B. Wilson, in: The Enzymes, 3rd ed., vol. 4
(Ed.: P. D. Boyer), Academic Press, New York, 1971, p. 373; b)
G. Parkin, Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 699–767; c) H. Vahrenkamp,
Dalton Trans. 2007, 4751–4759.
[5] a) H. Sakiyama, R. Mochizuki, A. Sugawara, M. Sakamoto,
Y. Nishida, M. Yamasaki, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1999,
997–1000; b) N. V. Kaminskaia, B. Spingler, S. J. Lippard, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6411–6422; c) N. Mitiæ, S. J. Smith,
A. Neves, L. W. Guddat, L. R. Gahan, G. Schenk, Chem. Rev.
2006, 106, 3338–3363; d) A. Tamilselvi, M. Nethaji, G. Mu-
gesh, Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 7797–7806.
[6] a) J. Chen, X. Wang, Y. Zhu, J. Lin, X. Yang, Y. Li, Y. Lu, Z.
Guo, Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 3424–3430; b) H. Sakiyama, K.
Ono, T. Suzuki, K. Tone, T. Ueno, Y. Nishida, Inorg. Chem.
Commun. 2005, 8, 372–374.
[7] a) C. Metcalfe, J. A. Thomas, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2003, 32, 215–
224; b) R. Jikido, H. Shiraishi, K. Matsufuji, M. Ohba, H.
Furutachi, M. Suzuki, H. Okawa, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2005,
78, 1795–1803.
Acridine Orange (AO) and Ethidium Bromide (EB) Staining: Acri-
dine orange and ethidium bromide staining was performed as de-
scribed by Spector et al.[25] The cell suspension of each sample that
contained 5ϫ105 cells was treated with AO and EB solution
(25 μL, 3.8 μm of AO and 2.5 μm of EB in PBS) and examined with
a fluorescent microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) using a UV filter
(450–490 nm). Three hundred cells per sample were counted in
triplicate for each dose point. The cells were scored as viable, apop-
totic, or necrotic as judged by the staining, nuclear morphology,
and membrane integrity,[25] and the percentages of apoptotic and
necrotic cells were then calculated. Morphological changes were
also observed and photographed.
[8] a) H. Zhang, C.-S. Liu, X.-H. Bu, M. J. Yang, Inorg. Biochem.
2005, 99, 1119–1124; b) S. R. Seidel, P. J. Stang, Acc. Chem.
Res. 2002, 35, 972–983.
[9] a) C. R. Choudhury, S. K. Dey, N. Mondal, S. Mitra, S. O. G.
Mahalli, K. M. A. Malik, J. Chem. Crystallogr. 2001, 31, 57–
62; b) C. Biswas, M. G. B. Drew, E. Ruiz, M. Estrader, C. Diaz,
A. Ghosh, Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 7474–7484; c) S. Thakurta,
J. Chakraborty, G. Rosair, J. Tercero, M. S. El Fallah, E. Gar-
ribba, S. Mitra, Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 6227–6235; d) J.-P. Co-
stes, J. Garcia-Tojal, J.-P. Tuchagues, L. Vendier, Eur. J. Inorg.
Chem. 2009, 3801–3806; e) F.-S. Guo, J.-L. Liu, J.-D. Leng,
Z.-S. Meng, Z.-J. Lin, M.-L. Tong, S. Gao, L. Ungur, L. F.
Chibotaru, Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 2458–2466; f) A. Majumder,
G. M. Rosair, A. Mallick, N. Chattopadhyay, S. Mitra, Polyhe-
dron 2006, 25, 1753–1762.
Hoechst 33528 Staining: The human hepatocarcinoma (HePG2)
cells were cultured in six-well plates and treated with IC50 concen-
tration of complexes. After 24 h of incubation, the treated and un-
treated cells were harvested and stained with Hoechst 33258
(1 mgmL–1, aqueous) for 5 min at room temperature. A drop of
cell suspension was placed on a glass slide, and a cover slip was
laid over to reduce light diffraction. At random 300 cells in dupli-
cate were observed at 400ϫ under a fluorescent microscope (Carl
Zeiss, Jena, Germany) fitted with a 377–355 nm filter, and the per-
centage of cells that reflected pathological changes was calculated.
[10] X. Sheng, X. Guo, X.-M. Lu, G.-Y. Lu, Y. Shao, F. Liu, Q.
Xu, Bioconjugate Chem. 2008, 19, 490–498.
[11] A. Silvestri, G. Barone, G. Ruisi, M. T. Lo Giudice, S. Tummi-
nello, J. Inorg. Biochem. 2004, 98, 589–594.
[12] M. Navarro, E. J. Cisneros-Fajardo, A. Sierralta, M. Fernan-
dez-Mestre, P. Silva, D. Arrieche, E. Marchan, J. Biol. Inorg.
Chem. 2003, 8, 401–408.
[13] a) S. Basak, S. Sen, S. Banerjee, S. Mitra, G. Rosair, M. T. G.
Rodriguez, Polyhedron 2007, 26, 5104–5112; b) A. Gupta, J.
Adhikary, T. K. Mondal, D. Das, Ind. J. Chem. A 2011, 50,
1463–1468.
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Experimental information such as the UV/Vis and fluores-
1
cence spectrum of 1, ESI mass spectra, H NMR spectrum of 3,5-
dtbq, rate versus [substrate] plot, Lineweaver–Burk plot, DNA
cleavage assay, and bond length and angle parameters is given.
[14] B. Biswas, N. Kole, M. Patra, S. Dutta, M. Ganguly, J. Chem.
Sci. 2013, 125, 1445–1453.
Acknowledgments
[15] J. G. Sole, L. E. Bausa, D. Jaque, An Introduction to Optical
Spectroscopy of Inorganic Solids, John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
[16] a) A. Guha, T. Chattopadhyay, N. D. Paul, M. Mukherjee, S.
Goswami, T. K. Mondal, E. Zangrando, D. Das, Inorg. Chem.
2012, 51, 8750–8759; b) K. S. Banu, T. Chattopadhyay, A.
Banerjee, M. Mukherjee, S. Bhattacharya, G. K. Patra, E. Zan-
grando, D. Das, Dalton Trans. 2009, 8755–8764; c) I. A. Koval,
P. Gamez, C. Belle, K. Selmeczib, J. Reedijk, Chem. Soc. Rev.
2006, 35, 814–840.
The work is supported financially by the Department of Science
and Technology (DST), New Delhi, India under the FAST
TRACK SCHEME for YOUNG SCIENTIST (No. SB/FT/CS-
088/2013 dtd. 21/05/2014). Generous help from Prof. D. Das of the
Department of Chemistry, The University of Calcutta, Kolkata and
Dr. T. Chattopadhyay of Panchokot Mahavidyalaya, Purulia, India
is also gratefully acknowledged. The authors also sincerely thank
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 0000, 0–0
8
© 0000 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim