C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
all-His vs a mixed His/carboxylato environment), the catalytic
promiscuity observed here reflects that the active site does not need
to be restricted to one structural pattern, which thus affords a new
direction for rational design of ligands and proteins for oxidation
catalysis. SgAP and its metal derivatives are the only protein system
to date that shows sharply different multiple catalytic activities.
Thus, this enzyme and its variants prepared in the future can serve
as unique dinuclear systems to provide further insight into the
correlation of structure and mechanism of metal-centered hydrolytic
and oxidation/oxygenation chemistry and may also serve as a “living
fossil” to hint for divergent enzyme evolution.
Figure 2. DTC superimposed onto Leu to reveal their structural similarity
(BioMedCAChe 6.1.10). In Leu, the carboxylate and the amino groups are
for metal binding, and the isobutyl group is for hydrophobic recognition.
Acknowledgment. This work was partially supported by the
Petroleum Research Funds, American Chemical Society (ACS-PRF
#35313-AC3), and the National Institutes of Health (GM064400-
01A2). This work is dedicated to Professor Joan Selverstone
Valentine on the occasion of her 60th birthday.
References
(1) (a) Pauling, L. Am. Sci. 1948, 36, 51-58. (b) Walsh, C. Enzymatic
Reaction Mechanisms; Freeman: New York, 1979.
(2) (a) O’Brian, P. J.; Herschlag, D. Chem. Biol. 1999, 6, 91-105. (b) Copley,
S. D. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003, 7, 265-272. (c) Yarnell, A. C&EN
News 2003, 33-35 (December 8). (d) Bornscheuer, U. T.; Kazlauskas,
R. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6032-6040. (e) Kazlauskas R. J.
Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2005, 9, 195-201.
(3) For example: (a) Ming, L.-J.; Valentine, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,
112, 6374-6383. (b) Jian, F.; Peisach, J.; Ming, L.-J.; Que, L., Jr.; Chen,
V. J. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 11437-11445. (c) Epperson, J. D.; Ming,
L.-J. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2001, 87, 149-156.
(4) (a) Bertini, I.; Luchinat, C. In Bioinorganic Chemistry; Bertini, I., Gray,
H. B., Lippard, S. J., Valentine, J. S., Eds.; Univeristy Science Books:
Sausalito, CA, 1994; pp 37-106.
(5) (a) Senior, S. Z.; Mans, L. L.; Van Guilder, H. D.; Kelly, K. A.; Hendrich,
M. P.; Elgren, T. E. Biochemistry 2003, 42, 4392-4397. (b) Bakker, M.;
van Rantwijk, F.; Sheldon, R. A. Can. J. Chem. 2002, 80, 622-625. (c)
Yamamura, K.; Kaiser, E. T. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976, 830-
831.
(6) (a) Park, H. I.; Ming, L.-J. Angew. Chem. 1999, 38, 2914-2916. (b) Ercan,
A.; Park, H. I.; Ming, L.-J. Chem. Commun. 2000, 2501-2502.
(7) Spungin, A.; Blumberg, S. Eur. J. Biochem. 1989, 183, 471-477.
(8) Lin, L.-Y.; Park, H. I.; Ming L.-J. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 2, 744-
749.
(9) (a) Oxidation of the catechol moiety can be monitored directly at 420 nm
(ꢀ ) 1600 M-1 cm-1) for the corresponding o-quinone or at 500 nm (ꢀ )
32 500 M-1 cm-1) in the presence of the o-quinone indicator,9b 3-methyl-
2-benzothiazolinone hydrazone MBTH (Fisher, Pittsburgh, PA), on a
Varian CARY 50 spectrophotometer equipped with a thermostat. Rates
were calculated and fitted to the Michaelis-Menten equation to give the
rate constants. A typical assay contained 80.0 nM CuCu-SgAP in 50.0
mM HEPES at pH 7.0 and 25 °C in the presence of 5.0 mM Ca2+, unless
specified. (b) Srivatsan, S. G.; Nigam, P.; Rao, M. S.; Verma, S. Appl.
Catal. A 2001, 209, 327-334.
Figure 3. 4,5-Dichlorocatechol (DCC) titration to 0.1 mM CuCu-SgAP in
50.0 mM HEPES at pH 7.0. The inset is the best fit to a quadratic ligand
binding pattern showing 1:1 DCC:CuCu-SgAP stoichiometry.
0.60 mM and a small catalytic efficiency of 162 M-1 s-1 at pH
7.0, which might be attributed to its different metal-binding and
recognition from Leu (cf. Figure 2).
The oxidation of DTC showed a [H2O2]-dependent increase in
activity. In the presence of 10.0 mM (0.034%) H2O2, the kcat value
of CuCu-SgAP is further increased (2.03 s-1) with only a small
change in Km (0.32 mM), which affords a second-order rate constant
nearly doubled to 6344 M-1 s-1. The proposed mechanism of
catechol oxidase includes an active Cu2+2-µ-η2-η2-peroxo species
that is isoelectronic to Cu+2O2 and Cu3+-bis-µ-oxo, which are all
capable of performing the 2e- oxidation of catechol to yield
o-quinone.15 Herein, H2O2 may facilitate the formation of an
electrophilic Cu2+2-µ-peroxo intermediate in CuCu-SgAP.
To gain further insight into substrate binding, a slow substrate,
4,5-dichlorocatechol (DCC which is only oxidized slowly at pH
8.0 with kcat ) 0.0045 s-1 and Km ) 0.15 mM), was titrated into
0.1 mM CuCu-SgAP at 25 °C and pH 7.0, and the electronic spectra
were collected (Figure 3). The ligand-to-metal charge transfer band
at 437 nm increases upon addition of DCC and reaches saturation
when more than 1 equiv of DCC is added, which can be nicely
fitted to a single-substrate binding mode (Figure 3, inset) to yield
a dissociation constant of 0.13 mM. The result provides direct
evidence and stoichiometry (DCC:active site ) 1:1) for catechol
binding to the dinuclear active site of CuCu-SgAP, yielding ꢀmax
) 1200 M-1 cm-1, that is consistent with observations in DCC or
trichlorocatechol binding to a dinuclear Cu2+ center.16
Taken together, the results reported herein suggest that SgAP
can serve as a template for the design of potential catalysts capable
of performing various chemical transformations, such as hydrolyses6
of peptide, phosphodiester, and phosphonatoester and catechol
oxidation, due to its easy purification, high thermal stability,7 and
easy preparation of metal derivatives.8,13 The existence of a “met-
like” di-Cu site in CuCu-SgAP similar to that observed in the crystal
structure of catechol oxidase16 with a bridging OH between the
two Cu2+ centers likely plays a role in the catalysis. Nevertheless,
since the active sites of these two enzymes are quite different (an
(10) For example:
k
cat/Km values of ∼1-40 M-1 s-1 in: (a) Mc¸ller, N.;
Piacenza, M.; Grimme, S.; Annette, R.; Krebs, B. Chem.sEur. J. 2005,
11, 1201-1209. (b) Selmeczi, K.; Re´glier, M.; Giorgi, M.; Speier, G.
Coord. Chem. ReV. 2003, 245, 191-201. (c) Wegner, R.; Gottschaldt,
M.; Poppitz, W.; Ja¨ger, E.-G.; Klemm, D. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2003,
201, 93-118. A rate-determining 138 M-1 s-1 in: (d) Granata, A.;
Monzani, E.; Casella, L.; J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 9, 903-913. An
efficient 475 M-1 s-1 in: (e) Wegner, R.; Gottschaldt, M.; Go¨rls, H.;
Ja¨ger, E.-G. Klemm, D. Chem.sEur. J. 2001, 7, 2143-2157.
(11) Rompel, A.; Fischer, H.; Meiwes, D.; Bue¨ldt-Karentzopoulos, K.; Magrini,
A.; Eicken, C.; Gerdemann, C.; Krebs, B. FEBS Lett. 1999, 445, 103-
110.
(12) After 7 h treatment at 70 °C, 21 and 23% activity remains, respectively,
toward the hydrolysis of Leu-pNA and oxidation of DTC.
(13) Hasselgren, C.; Park, H. I.; Ming, L.-J. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 6,
120-127.
(14) Gilboa, R.; Spungin-Bialik, A.; Wohlfahrt, G.; Schomburg, D.; Blumberg,
S.; Shoham, G. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2001, 44, 490-504.
(15) Gerdemann, C.; Eicken, C.; Krebs, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 183-
191.
(16) Torelli, S.; Belle, C.; Hamman, S.; Pierre, J. P. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41,
3983-3989.
JA056034U
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 47, 2005 16381