obtained from previous condensations with glycinates 11 (cf.
9).4 The anti : syn ratios were determined by integration of the
1H NMR spectra of the crude products. These data also revealed
that the remaining material balance from the condensations was
largely N-tosyl glycinate, probably formed in most cases by
competing deprotonation of the ynals 12. In many cases, the
major anti-isomers 13 could be separated by fractional
crystallisation in 60–70% yields. Subsequent chemistry re-
vealed that the adducts 13 were relatively prone to a-
epimerization and so we were somewhat nervous about
structural determination by, for example, manipulation through
to a cyclic structure. Fortunately, the anti-phenyl derivative [13;
R = Ph] provided crystals suitable for X-ray analysis,7 which
revealed the anti-stereoselection.
Thus encouraged, we carried out similar condensations using
conjugated ynones 14 as the electrophiles. These too were
successful and showed very useful levels of, again, anti-
stereoselectivity (Scheme 4). 3-Butyn-2-one also condensed
well with enolate 11, without the need to protect the potentially
labile alkynyl proton, to give adduct 16 in similar yield and
selectivity. Again, the pure anti-isomers could be separated by
careful crystallization in 60–70% yields and the relative
stereochemistry confirmed by X-ray analysis [15; R = Pri].7
well with Kazmaier’s results and with his explanation based on
a Felkin–Anh model.2–4 However, these results are not
consistent with his conclusion that the mixture of adducts 9,
obtained from glycinate 11, was due to epimerization.
Uncertainties regarding the true nature of glycinate enolate
11 preclude much speculation. Indeed, the picture appears more
complicated, because the condensations with ynones 14 gave
adducts 15 with the same anti-selection, despite the larger
substituent now being the “R” group rather than the alkyne
residue, in contrast to the related ynals 12, especially when “R”
is branched [14; R = Pri]. Currently, one suggestion is that, if
structure 11 is correct, the anti-stereoselection requires the
alkyne group to be positioned axially, in a typical chair-like
transition state 19. Could this be due to donation from the
alkyne bond into vacant tin orbitals? The same effect could be
responsible for the similar but lower anti-stereoselection of
condensations with enals and enones 17. Of relevance is our
observation, consistent with Kazmaier’s, that condensations
between enolate 11 and saturated aldehydes show almost no
stereoselection. Hence, lack of complexation and not later
epimerization may be responsible for this. Further studies aimed
at shedding light on this along with synthetic applications of the
various products reported herein are in progress.
We are grateful to the Government of Thailand, Millennium
Pharmaceuticals and the EPSRC for financial support and the
EPSRC Mass Spectrometry Service, University College, Swan-
sea for high resolution mass spectrometric data
Scheme 4
Notes and references
1 For recent contributions, see A. E. Taggi, A. M. Hafez and T. Lectka, Acc.
Chem. Res., 2003, 36, 10; V. A. Soloshonok, Curr. Org. Chem., 2002, 6,
341.
Finally, we briefly examined the outcome of such condensa-
tions when applied to enals and enones 17. In general, these
showed lower, but still useful, levels of anti-stereoselection in
the expected products 18. These results are collected in Scheme
5.8
The high anti-stereoselectivity of the condensations between
the glycinate enolate 11 and ynals 12 (Scheme 3) certainly fits
2 R. Grandel, U. Kazmaier and B. Nuber, Annalen, 1996, 1143.
3 R. Grandel and U. Kazmaier, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1998, 407.
4 U. Kazmaier and R. Grandel, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 1998, 1833. See also R.
Grandel, U. Kazmaier and F. Rominer, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 4524.
For the use of related zinc enolates in Pd-catalysed allylations, see U.
Kazmaier and F. L. Zumpe, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 1468; U.
Kazmaier and F. L. Zumpe, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2001, 4067; U.
Kazmaier, S. Maier and F. L. Zumpe, Synlett., 2000, 1523.
5 D. W. Knight, A. L. Redfern and J. Gilmore, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1, 2001, 2874; 2002, 622.
6 M. Journet, D. W. Cai, L. M. DiMichele and R. D. Larsen, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1998, 39, 6427.
7 See ESI† for full details of these determinations which have been
deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC 210386
[13; R = Ph] and 210604 [15; R = Pri].
8 The anti-stereochemistry of the major diastereoisomer was determined
by X-ray analysis of anti-18 [R1–3 = Me] [CCDC 210387, ESI†],
together with comparisons of spectroscopic data.
Scheme 5
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 2550–2551
2551