12
L. Faure et al. / Phytochemistry xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
4.2.5. N-(2-Methylpropyl)hexadecanamide or
(overlapping signals, 4H, –CH2), 1.61 (mp, 2H, –CH2), 1.35–1.29
N-isobutylpalmitoylamide (5)
(overlapping signals, 14H, –CH2), 1.12 (t, 3H, –CH3), 0.87 (t, 3H,
–CH3). HRMS: [M+H]+ of m/z 308.2949; calculated mass:
308.2953 for C20H37NO.
White solid. 91.4% yield. 1H NMR (in CDCl3, 400 MHz), d (ppm):
5.453 (bs, 1H, NH), 3.076 (mp, 2H, –CH2), 2.162 (t, 2H, –CH2), 1.753
(mp, 1H, –CH), 1.637 (mp, 2H, –CH2), 1.246 (overlapping signals,
24H, –CH2), 0.951–0.857 (overlapping signals, 9H, –CH3). 13C
NMR (in CDCl3, 500 MHz) d (ppm): 173.5, 47.1, 37.2, 32.2, 29.9–
29.6 (9 overlapping signals), 28.8, 26.2, 23.0, 20.4, 14.4. HRMS:
[M+H]+ of m/z 312.3263; calculated mass: 312.3266 for C20H41NO.
4.3. Plant materials and growth
Ten mg of different Arabidopsis thaliana seeds (faah1-KO, FAAH-
OE, Col(0); Wang et al., 2006) were surface sterilized and then
stratified in the dark for 2 days at 4 °C prior to sowing in solid
MS (Murashige and Skoog) medium containing different concen-
trations of NAE 12:0 or alkamides (Teaster et al., 2007). Growth
4.2.6. N-Propylhexadecanamide or N-propylpalmitoylamide (6)
White solid. 82.2% yield. 1H NMR (in CDCl3, 400 MHz), d (ppm):
5.42 (bs, 1H, NH), 3.20 (mp, 2H, –CH2), 2.15 (t, 2H, –CH2), 1.62 (mp,
2H, –CH2), 1.50 (mp, 2H, –CH2), 1.28–1.25 (overlapping signals,
24H, –CH2), 0.94–0.86 (overlapping signals, 9H, –CH3). HRMS:
[M+H]+ of m/z 298.3107; calculated mass: 298.3110 for C19H39NO.
of seedlings was in 16 h-light/8 h-dark cycle (60 l )
mol mÀ2 sÀ1
for 11 days at 20 °C. Images of primary roots and cotyledons were
captured using a Nikon DX camera. Root lengths and cotyledon
areas were measured using ImageJ software (1.4.3.67 version).
Statistical tests (Student’s t-test) were conducted by using the
Microsoft Excel 2010 software.
4.2.7. N-(1-Methylethyl)hexadecanamide or
N-isopropylpalmitoylamide (7)
White solid. 62.2% yield. 1H NMR (in CDCl3, 400 MHz), d (ppm):
5.20 (bs, 1H, NH), 4.09 (mp, 1H, –CH), 2.11 (t, 2H, –CH2), 1.61 (mp,
2H, –CH2), 1.28–1.25 (overlapping signals, 24H, –CH2), 1.15 (d, 6H,
–CH3), 0.88 (mp, 3H, –CH3). HRMS: [M+H]+ of m/z 298.3106; calcu-
lated mass: 298.3110 for C19H39NO.
4.4. Protein expression and purification
The recombinant plasmid FAAH1-pTrcHis2 (At5g64440, Uni-
prot # Q7XJJ7) was constructed as described in Shrestha et al.
(2003). Arabidopsis-FAAH proteins (FAAH) were expressed and
purified in a 50 mM Bis-Tris propane–HCl (pH 9), Triton X-100
(1% v/v) using an a QiQexpressÒ NI–NTA Fast Start (QiagenÒ) col-
umn as described elsewhere (Faure et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2013).
An FPLCÒ system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was used for
all gel filtration chromatography separations. The purified protein
from the Ni-column was concentrated by filtration–centrifugation
using a Centricon YM-30 (Millipore, Bedford, MA) device to a final
4.2.8. N-Ethylhexadecanamide or N-ethylpalmitoylamide (8)
White solid. 43.5% yield. 1H NMR (in CDCl3, 400 MHz), d (ppm):
5.39 (bs, 1H, NH), 3.29 (mp, 2H, –CH2), 2.14 (t, 2H, –CH2), 1.61 (mp,
2H, –CH2), 1.28–1.25 (overlapping signals, 24H, –CH2), 1.13 (t, 3H,
–CH3), 0.88 (t, 3H, –CH3). HRMS: [M+H]+ of m/z 284.2949; calcu-
lated mass: 284.2953 for C18H37NO.
volume of 200 ll and then loaded onto a Superdex 200 gel filtra-
4.2.9. N-(2-Methylproyl)-(9Z,12Z)octadecadienamide or
N-isobutyllinoleamide (9)
tion column (GE health care life sciences). The column was equili-
brated with 50 mM Bis-Tris propane–HCl, (pH 9), 0.1 M NaCl,
0.2 mM DDM and the eluted proteins were monitored by UV absor-
bance at 280 nm. Fractions were collected and assayed for enzyme
activity and analyzed by SDS–PAGE and Western blotting to con-
firm the location of the eluted FAAH protein (Faure et al., 2014).
Molecular mass calibration of the column was done using blue
dextran (669 kDa), b-amylase (200 kDa), alcohol dehydrogenase
(150 kDa), albumin (66 kDa) and carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa).
Yellow oil. 78.1% yield. 1H NMR (in CDCl3, 400 MHz), d (ppm):
5.40–5.28 (overlapping signals, 5H, NH and C@CAH), 3.08 (t, 2H,
–CH2), 2.77 (t, 2H, –CH2), 2.17 (t, 2H, –CH2), 2.06–2.04 (overlapping
signals, 4H, –CH2), 1.76 (mp, 1H, –CH), 1.63 (mp, 2H, –CH2), 1.35–
1.31 (overlapping signals, 14H, –CH2), 0.92–0.90 (overlapping sig-
nals, 9H, –CH3). HRMS: [M+H]+ of m/z 336.3262; calculated
mass:336.3266 for C22H41NO.
4.2.10. N-Propyl-(9Z,12Z)octadecadienamide or N-propyllinoleamide
(10)
4.5. FAAH assays
Yellow oil. 73.9% yield. 1H NMR (in CDCl3, 400 MHz), d (ppm):
5.52 (bs, 1H, NH), 5.40–5.28 (overlapping signals, 4H, C@CAH)
3.19 (mp, 2H, –CH2), 2.75 (t, 2H, –CH2), 2.14 (t, 2H, –CH2), 2.02
(overlapping signals, 4H, –CH2), 1.61 (mp, 2H, –CH2), 1.50 (mp,
2H, –CH2), 1.35–1.29 (overlapping signals, 14) [M+H]+ of m/z
322.3107; calculated mass: 322.3110 for C21H39NO.
The NAE amidohydrolase assays were conducted as previously
described (Kim et al., 2013) with few modifications. The reactions
were conducted for 30 min at 30 °C, in BTP buffer (150 ll, 50 mM
Bis-Tris propane–HCl, pH 9.0), with different concentrations of cold
or radiolabelled NAEs, and different concentrations of alkamides at
varying concentrations of purified protein (see legend of Figs. for
details in reaction compositions). The reactions were terminated
by adding hot iPrOH (2 ml, 70 °C). The lipids were extracted and
the distribution of lipids was evaluated by radiometric scanning
of TLC plates as described (Shrestha et al., 2006). For the non-radio-
active assays, lipids were located by UV of the TLC plate after
spraying a solution of primuline as described (Testet et al., 2005)
or they were analyzed by GC–MS. Extracted lipid after enzymatic
reactions were evaporated under N2, and derivatized with BSTFA
4.2.11. N-(1-Methylethyl)-(9Z,12Z)octadecadienamide or
N-isopropyllinoleamide (11)
Yellow oil. 80.1% yield. 1H NMR (in CDCl3, 400 MHz), d (ppm):
5.40–5.28 (overlapping signals, 5H, NH and C@CAH), 4.06 (mp,
1H, –CH), 2.75 (t, 2H, –CH2), 2.11 (t, 2H, –CH2), 2.04 (overlapping
signals, 4H, –CH2), 1.60 (mp, 2H, –CH2), 1.35–1.29 (overlapping sig-
nals, 14H, –CH2), 1.14–1.12 (d, 6H, –CH3), 0.87 (t, 3H, –CH3). HRMS:
[M+H]+ of m/z 322.3104; calculated mass: 322.3110 for C21H39NO.
(50
TMS-ether derivatives were dried under N2 and suspended in hex-
ane 50 l) for injection. Lipid analyses were performed using a GC–
ll, Fisher Scientific, Houston, TX, USA) for 30 min at 55 °C.
4.2.12. N-Ethyl-(9Z,12Z)octadecadienamide or N-ethyllinoleamide
(12)
l
MS model Agilent GC 7890A/MSD 5975C system and a capillary
HP-5 MS column (30 m  0.250 mm, 0.25-mm coating thickness;
Agilent Technologies) in full mass scan mode as previously
described (Keereetaweep et al., 2013). Identification of the
FFAs or alkamides was based on identification of characteristic
Yellow oil. 59.5% yield. 1H NMR (in CDCl3, 400 MHz), d (ppm):
Yellow oil. 73.9% yield. 1H NMR (in CDCl3, 400 MHz), d (ppm):
5.53 (bs, 1H, NH), 5.40–5.28 (overlapping signals, 4H, C@CAH)
3.27 (mp, 2H, –CH2), 2.75 (t, 2H, –CH2), 2.13 (t, 2H, –CH2), 2.02
Please cite this article in press as: Faure, L., et al. Effects of synthetic alkamides on Arabidopsis fatty acid amide hydrolase activity and plant development.