S.M. Ribeiro et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 326 (2010) 121–127
127
[
2] (a) A.G. Griesbeck, J. Neudorfl, A. Horauf, S. Specht, A. Raabe, J. Med. Chem. 52
(
(
(
2009) 3420;
b) A.G. Griesbeck, D. Blunk, T.T. El-Idreesy, A. Raabe, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46
2007) 8883.
[
[
[
3] A. Baran, M. Balci, J. Org. Chem. 74 (2009) 88, and references cited therein.
4] T. Montagnon, M. Tofi, G. Vassilikogiannakis, Acc. Chem. Res. 41 (2008) 1001.
5] (a) E.G. Azenha, A.C. Serra, M. Pineiro, M.M. Pereira, J. Seixas de Melo, L.G.
Arnaut, S.J. Formosinho, A.M.d’A. Rocha Gonsalves, Chem. Phys. 280 (2002) 177;
(
b) D. Murtinho, M. Pineiro, M.M. Pereira, A.M.d’A. Rocha Gonsalves, L.G. Arnaut,
M. Gra c¸ a Miguel, H.D. Burrows, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 (2000) 2441;
c) H. Quast, T. Dietz, A. Witzel, Liebigs Ann. (1995) 1495.
6] (a) M.S. Ribeiro, A.C. Serra, A.M.d’A. Rocha Gonsalves, Tetrahedron 63 (2007)
885;
b) A.G. Griesbeck, T.T. El-Idreesy, A. Bartoscheck, Adv. Synth. Catal. 346 (2004)
45;
c) M. Benaglia, T. Danelli, F. Fabris, D. Sperandio, G. Pozzi, Org. Lett. 4 (2002)
229.
7] J. Wahlen, D.E. De Vos, P.A. Jacobs, P.L. Alsters, Adv. Synth. Catal. 346 (2004)
52.
(
[
7
(
2
(
Scheme 3. Relative yields of products from the singlet oxygen oxidation of linalool
11) using porphyrin 1 and PAAS3 as sensitizers.
4
(
[
1
[
[
8] A. Corma, H. Garcia, Adv. Synth. Catal. 348 (2006) 1391.
9] (a) H. Schmaderer, P. Hilgers, R. Lechner, B. Konig, Adv. Synth. Catal. 351 (2009)
nanceover theregioisomer 8, dependingonthe reactionconditions.
In solution with porphyrin 1 (entries 1 and 2) a slight excess of 9
over 8 is observed, in agreement with the expected regioselectiv-
ity for a trisubstituted double bond [26], but unlike other systems
where 8 is the predominant isomer [23,25a,c]. Changing the reac-
tion solvent to carbon tetrachloride (entry 3) increases the amount
regioisomer 8 as the major product, as observed by others [25a].
Supported photosensitizers, however, show a preference for regioi-
somer 9 which is evident in the 1/5000 ratio (entries 5, 6, 8–11).
The preference for 9 was already observed in polystyrene supported
photosensitizer photooxidation systems [11,25d], but in the case of
our silica supported photosensitizers this preference is more obvi-
ous. Again, changing the solvent for carbon tetrachloride originates
an increase of the regioisomer 8 relatively to the reaction carried
out in chloroform (compare entries 8 and 9). The reason for this
increment may possibly be related to the primary hydroxyl group
on citronellol which may help to fix this substrate to the silica sur-
face and somehow favor regioselectivity for product 9. The effect
of the hydroxyl group on the regioselectivity with this kind of sup-
ported photosensitizers is also observed in the case of linalool (11).
The photooxidation of 11 with the silica supported photosensitizer
PAAS3 favors the formation of the hydroperoxide 13 relatively to
the photooxidation with the free photosensitizer 1 (Scheme 3).
1
63;
(b) T. Carofiglio, P. Donnola, M. Maggini, M. Rosseto, E. Rossi, Adv. Synth. Catal.
50 (2008) 2815;
c) K. Ishii, Y. Kikukawa, M. Shiine, N. Kobayashi, T. Tsuru, Y. Sakai, A. Sakoda,
3
(
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2008) 2975;
(d) H. Shimakoshi, T. Baba, Y. Iseki, A. Endo, C. Adachi, M. Watanabe, Y. Hisaeda,
Tetrahedron Lett. 49 (2008) 6198;
(
e) C. Cantau, S. Larribau, T. Pigot, M. Simon, M.T. Maurette, S. Lacombe, Catal.
Today 122 (2007) 27;
(f) K. Feng, R.-Y. Zhang, L.-Z. Wu, B. Tu, M.-L. Peng, L.-P. Zhang, D. Zhao, C.-H.
Tung, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 14685;
(
1
g) N. Kitamura, K. Yamada, K. Ueno, S. Iwata, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.
84 (2006) 170;
(h) T. Hino, T. Anzai, N. Kuramoto, Tetrahedron Lett. 47 (2006) 1429.
[10] (a) C. Cantau, T. Pigot, N. Manoj, E. Oliveros, S. Lacombe, ChemPhysChem 8
(
(
2007) 2344;
b) S. Jockush, J. Sivaguru, N.J. Turro, V. Ramamurthy, Photochem. Photobiol.
Sci. 4 (2005) 403;
(c) K.-K. Iu, J.K. Thomas, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 71 (1993) 55.
11] M.S. Ribeiro, A.C. Serra, A.M.d’A. Rocha Gonsalves, J. Catal. 256 (2008) 331.
12] R.A.W. Johnstone, M.L.P.G. Nunes, M.M. Pereira, A.M.d’A. RochaGonsalves, A.C.
Serra, Heterocycles 43 (1996) 1423.
[13] T. Luts, W. Suprum, D. Hofmann, O. Klepel, H. Papp, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 261
2007) 16.
14] D. Zois, C. Vartzouma, Y. Deligiannakis, N. Hadjiliadis, L. Casella, E. Monzani, M.
Louloudi, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 261 (2007) 306.
[15] H. Tokuyama, E. Nakamura, J. Org. Chem. 59 (1994) 1135.
[
[
(
[
[
16] C.J. Pouchert, The Aldrich Library of NMR Spectra, vol. 1, 2nd ed., Aldrich Chem-
ical, Millwaukee, WI, 1983, p. 742.
[
17] (a) G. Ohloff, B. Lienhard, Helv. Chim. Acta 48 (1965) 182;
(b) H. Knapp, M. Straubinger, S. Fornari, N. Oka, N. Watanabe, P. Winterhalter,
J. Agric. Food Chem. 46 (1998) 1966–1970.
4
. Conclusion
[
18] M. Sköld, A. Börje, E. Harambasic, A.T. Karlberg, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 17 (2004)
We have achieved the synthesis of heterogeneous silica
1
697.
[19] (a) R. Qu, M. Wang, C. Sun, Y. Zhang, C. Ji, H. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 (2008)
361;
b) X. Wang, K.S.K. Lin, J.C.C. Chan, S. Cheng, J. Phys. Chem. B 109 (2005) 1763.
supported photooxidation catalysts by chlorosulphonation of por-
phyrins and reaction with aminomodified silica supports. The
photooxidation of ␣-terpinene (4) with these heterogeneous cata-
lysts gives the [4+2] cyclic product ascaridole with high yields but
reaction times are much longer than using the non-supported por-
phyrin 1. Photooxidation of citronellol (7) with supported catalysts
also gives high yields of products derived from the ene reaction and
shows a preference for regioisomer 9 which is substantially differ-
ent from the photooxidation with homogeneous catalysts which
favor regioisomer 8.
3
(
[
20] (a) T. Shamim, M. Gupta, S. Paul, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 302 (2009) 15;
(b) A.R. Silva, K. Wilson, A.C. Whitwood, J.H. Clark, C. Freire, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
(2006) 1275.
[
[
[
21] P. Kraft, J.A. Bajgrowicz, C. Denis, G. Fráter, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39 (2000)
2980.
22] W. Pickenhagen, D. Schatkowski, US Patent 5 892 059 (1999), to Dragoco Ger-
berding & Co., Aktiengesellschaft.
23] M. Oelgemöller, C. Jung, J. Ortner, J. Mattay, E. Zimmermann, Green. Chem. 7
(
2005) 35.
[
[
24] M. Prein, W. Adam, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 35 (1996) 477.
25] (a) A.G. Griesbeck, A. Bartoschek, Chem. Commun. (2002) 1594;
(
b) S.A. Chavan, W. Maes, L.E.M. Gevers, J. Wahlen, I.F.J. Vankelecom, P.A. Jacobs,
W. Dehaen, D.E. De Vos, Chem. Eur. J. 11 (2005) 6754;
c) M.J. Fuchter, B.M. Hoffman, A.G.M. Barrett, J. Org. Chem. 71 (2006) 724;
(d) A.G. Griesbeck, A. Bartoschek, J. Neudorfl, C. Miara, Photochem. Photobiol.
2 (2006) 1233;
e) S. Meyer, D. Tietze, S. Rau, B. Schafer, G. Kreisel, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A:
Chem. 186 (2007) 248.
[26] (a) M. Orfanopoulos, M.B. Grdina, L.M. Stephenson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 101 (1979)
75;
b) A.G. Griesbeck, W. Adam, A. Bartoschek, T.T. El-Idreesy, Photochem. Photo-
biol. Sci. 2 (2003) 877.
Acknowledgements
(
The authors would like to thank Chymiotechnon, and FCT-
POCTI/QUI/55931/2004, FCT(SFRH/BD/40228/2007) for financial
support. We acknowledge the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Lab-
oratory of the Coimbra Chemical Centre-University of Coimbra
8
(
2
(
(
Proj/REEQ/481/QUI/2006) for obtaining the NMR data.
References
[1] (a) E.L. Clennan, A. Pace, Tetrahedron 61 (2005) 6665;
(
(
b) M.C. DeRosa, R.J. Crutchley, Coord. Chem. Rev. 233–234 (2002) 351;
c) A. Maldotti, A. Molinari, R. Amadelli, Chem. Rev. 102 (2002) 3811.