P. R. Bohländer, H.-A. Wagenknecht
SHORT COMMUNICATION
2; HPLC traces and MALDI mass spectra of modified oligonucleo-
tides; photobleaching experiments; and detailed spectroscopic data
of DNA5 (variation of excitation wavelength and fluorescence in-
tensity ratio).
Acknowledgments
Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
(
DFG) (grant numbers Wa 1386/13-1 and Wa 1386/17-1) and
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) is gratefully acknowl-
edged.
[
1] For reviews, see: a) H. Kobayashi, M. Ogawa, R. Alford, P. L.
Choydke, Y. Urano, Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2620–2640, and ref-
erences cited therein; b) M. Y. Berezin, S. Achilefu, Chem. Rev.
Figure 4. UV/Vis absorption (top left), fluorescence (top right), and
images of fluorescence color change (bottom) of DNA2 during a
2
010, 110, 2641–2684, and references cited therein; c) B. A. Ar-
mitage, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2011, 15, 806–812, and refer-
ences cited therein; d) P. V. Chang, C. R. Bertozzi, Chem. Com-
mun. 2012, 48, 8864–8879, and references cited therein;
E. M. S. Stennett, M. A. Ciuba, M. Levitus, Chem. Soc. Rev.
titration with DNA1 in 0.1 equiv. steps (2.5 μm in 10 mm Na-P
i
buffer, pH 7, 250 mm NaCl, λexc = 430 nm); DNA5 represents the
duplex consisting of DNA1 and DNA2.
2014, 43, 1057–1075, and references cited therein.
the insertion of a cyano substituent into the smaller TO dye [2] For reviews, see: a) G. Patterson, M. Davidson, S. Manley, J.
Lippincott-Schwartz, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2010, 61, 345–
significantly altered its optical properties and dramatically
367, and references cited therein; b) Q. Zheng, M. F. Juette,
lowered the fluorescence quantum yields.[ The quantum
yield of DNA5 is 34.2% if dye 2 is excited at λ = 430 nm,
and the energy transfer takes place. If dye 1 in DNA5 is
excited directly at λ = 540 nm, the quantum yield is 40.7%;
hence, the energy-transfer efficiency in DNA5 can be calcu-
lated by the ratio of both quantum yields and gives the
remarkable value of 0.84. The melting temperatures of
singly modified DNA double strands DNA1 and DNA2
were not altered significantly relative to that of unmodified
DNA6. Doubly modified DNA5 showed slight stabiliza-
tion, probably as a result of dye–dye interactions.
19]
S. Jockusch, M. R. Wasserman, Z. Zhou, R. B. Altman, S. C.
Blanchard, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 1044–1056, and refer-
ences cited therein.
[
3] For reviews, see: a) A. A. Marti, S. Jockusch, N. Stevens, J. Ju,
N. J. Turro, Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 402–409, and references
cited therein; b) K. Wang, Z. Tang, J. Y. Chaoyong, Y. Kim,
X. Fang, W. Li, Y. Wu, C. D. Medley, Z. Cao, J. Li, P. Colon,
H. Lin, W. Tan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 856–870; An-
gew. Chem. 2009, 121, 870–885, and references cited therein; c)
J. Stambasky, M. Hocek, P. Kocovsky, Chem. Rev. 2009, 109,
6729–6764, and references cited therein; d) V. L. Malinowski,
D. Wenger, R. Häner, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 410–422, and
references cited therein; e) R. W. Sinkeldam, N. J. Greco, Y.
Tor, Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2579–2619, and references cited
therein; f) Y. N. Teo, E. T. Kool, Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 4221–
4
245, and references cited therein.
4] S. Preis, L. M. Wilhelmsson, ChemBioChem 2012, 13, 1990–
001.
5] a) E. Socher, A. Knoll, O. Seitz, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10,
363–7371; b) F. Hövelmann, I. Gaspar, A. Ephrussi, O. Seitz,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2072–2081.
Conclusions
[
[
2
Compared to our previously applied TR dye, cyano-
modified red-emitting dye 1 showed significantly improved
photostability, larger apparent Stokes’ shift, and enhanced
7
quantum yield. Moreover, in comparison to TO, green- [6] For a review, see: A. Okamoto, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 5815–
emitting dye 2 also exhibited improved photostability, larger
Stokes’ shift, and comparable quantum yield. Both dyes
were synthesized in good yields and were incorporated into
oligonucleotides through postsynthetic “click”-type chemis-
5828, and references cited therein.
[
[
7] P. Bohländer, H.-A. Wagenknecht, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013,
11, 7458–7462.
8] For a review, see: C. Holzhauser, H.-A. Wagenknecht, J. Org.
Chem. 2013, 78, 7373–7379, and references cited therein.
try that facilitated the preparation of modified DNA. Both [9] a) C. Holzhauser, S. Berndl, F. Menacher, M. Breunig, A.
Göpferich, H.-A. Wagenknecht, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 1239–
photostable dyes, 1 and 2, were combined in a diagonal ar-
1248; b) C. Holzhauser, H.-A. Wagenknecht, Angew. Chem.
rangement in double-stranded DNA to give an energy-
transfer pair that provided better optical properties than the
TO/TR combination, including comparable apparent Sto-
Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7268–7272; Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 7406–
410; c) C. Holzhauser, H.-A. Wagenknecht, ChemBioChem
2012, 13, 1136–1138.
7
kes’ shift (182 nm), high energy-transfer efficiency (0.84), [10] C. Holzhauser, R. Liebl, A. Goepferich, H.-A. Wagenknecht,
M. Breunig, ACS Chem. Biol. 2013, 8, 890–894.
and a remarkable emission color contrast ratio (red/green =
[
11] For a review, see: W. Schmucker, H.-A. Wagenknecht, Synlett
77:1). It is evident that new cyanine dyes 1 and 2 represent
2012, 23, 2435–2448, and references cited therein.
promising candidates for photostable dual-emitting and
wavelength-shifting nucleic acid probes, such as our “DNA
traffic lights”.
[
12] a) R. Huisgen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1963, 2, 565–598;
Angew. Chem. 1963, 75, 604–637; b) Q. Wang, T. R. Chan, R.
Hilgraf, V. V. Fokin, K. B. Sharpless, M. G. Finn, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 3192–3193; c) M. Meldal, C. W. Tornoe, Chem.
Rev. 2008, 108, 2952–3015.
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Experimental details and syntheses; IR spectra, NMR spectra,
and mass spectra of each compound; elemental analyses of 1 and
[13] For reviews, see: a) P. M. Gramlich, C. T. Wirges, A. Manetto,
T. Carell, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8350–8358; Angew.
7550
www.eurjoc.org
© 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 7547–7551