Communications
enantiopure (R)-2 (50%). Addition of the aldolases lTA and
DYKAT protocol starting from dl-syn-1 gave enantiopure
amino alcohol (R)-2 in good yield. Currently, we are testing
other acceptor compounds in this novel one-pot amino-
methylation to obtain valuable aromatic 1,2-amino alcohols.
dTA[9] after 24 h resulted in a three-enzyme DYKAT (l-
TyrDC, lTA/dTA) which converted the remaining d-syn-1
(50%) into benzaldehyde and glycine, and thereafter into l-
syn-1/l-anti-1 and finally (R)-2/(S)-2. Theoretically, the quan-
titative resolution of dl-syn-1 by this protocol with delayed
addition of lTA and dTA should give an ee value of 88% for
amino alcohol 2 (R, Scheme 3), when the results of the one-
pot, two-enzyme approach are considered (R/S 89:11,
Scheme 3). The following application of this protocol
showed that enantioenriched 2 (82% ee R) was obtained in
only 44% yield at pH 5.5 if all three enzymes were added at
the beginning (Table 1, entry 1). The low yield might be
Received: October 9, 2006
Published online: January 24, 2007
Keywords: aldol reaction · amino alcohols · biocatalysis · lyases ·
.
threonine aldolase
[1] a) M. G. Silvestri, G. Desantis, M. Mitchell, C.-H. Wong, Top.
Stereochem. 2003, 23, 267 – 342; b) W.-D. Fessner in Modern
Aldol Reactions (Ed.: R. Mahrwald), VCH, Weinheim, 2004,
pp. 201 – 272.
Table 1: Synthesis of (R)-2 by using a KAT/DYKAT protocol.[a]
[2] L. J. Whalen, C.-H. Wong, Aldrichimica Acta 2006, 39, 63 – 71.
[3] M. Braun in Modern Aldol Reactions (Ed.: R. Mahrwald), VCH,
Weinheim, 2004, pp. 1 – 62.
[4] Review on threonine aldolases: J. Q. Liu, T. Dairi, N. Itoh, M.
Kataoka, S. Shimizu, H. Yamada, J. Mol. Catal. B 2000, 10, 107 –
115.
[5] a) F. P. Seebeck, D. Hilvert, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10158 –
10159; b) F. P. Seebeck, A. Guainazzi, C. Amoreira, K. K.
Baldridge, D. Hilvert, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 6978 – 6980;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6824 – 6826.
[6] a) B. T. Lotz, C. M. Gasparski, K. Peterson, M. J. Miller, J.
Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1990, 1107 – 1109; b) V. P. Vassilev,
T. Uchiyama, T. Kajimoto, C.-H. Wong, Tetrahedron Lett. 1995,
36, 4081 – 4084; c) T. Kimura, V. P. Vassilev, G.-J. Shen, C.-H.
Wong, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11734 – 11742.
[7] J. Steinreiber, K. Fesko, C. Reisinger, M. Schürmann, F.
van Assema, M. Wolberg, D. Mink, H. Griengl, Tetrahderon
2007, 63, 918 – 926.
Entry
pH
Yield 2 [%]
(5 h)
ee (R) [ %]
(5 h)
Yield 2 [%]
(80 h)
ee (R) [ %]
(80 h)
1[b]
2[c]
5.5
5.5
6.0
6.0
6.5
6.5
7.0
7.0
7.5
7.5
5.5
23
46
15
39
13
35
3
25
<1
10
80
>99
72
>99
80
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
n.d.[f]
44
67
47
57
28
58
11
50
4
82
>99
82
>99
80
>99
82
>99
>99
>99
>99
3[b]
4[c]
5[b]
6[c]
7[b]
8[c]
9[b]
10[c]
11[c,d]
24
n.d.[f]
58[e]
[8] M. Bechthold, S. Makart, M. Heinemann, S. Panke, J. Biotech-
nol. 2006, 124, 146 – 162.
[9] J. Q. Liu, M. Odani, T. Yasuoka, T. Dairi, N. Itoh, M. Kataoka, S.
Shimizu, H. Yamada, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 54, 44 –
51.
[a] Conditions: 1-mL reaction volume, dl-syn-1 100 mm, glycine 900 mm,
PLP 50 mm, MnCl2 50 mm, 258C, lTA 19 U, dTA 6 U, l-TyrDC 0.4 U; yield
and ee values were determined by HPLC. [b] Addition of lTA/dTA at t=
0 h. [c] Addition of lTA/dTA after t=24 h. [d] 5-mL reaction scale.
[e] Yield of isolated product after t=100 h. [f] n.d.=not determined.
[10] T. Nikaido, N. Kawada, T. Hamatani, Y. Ueda (Daicel Chemical
Industries), WO 9523869, 1995; T. Nikaido, N. Kawada, T.
Hamatani, Y. Ueda (Daicel Chemical Industries), US 5731175,
1998; T. Nikaido, N. Kawada, T. Hamatani, Y. Ueda (Daicel
Chemical Industries), US 5846792, 1998; T. Nikaido, N. Kawada,
T. Hamatani, Y. Ueda (Daicel Chemical Industries),
US 5874613, 1999.
[11] S. Ito, T. Nikaido, A. Matsuyama (Daicel Chemical Industries),
JP 46076, 2001.
[12] For reviews about parallel kinetic resolution, see a) J. R. Dehli,
V. Gotor, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2002, 31, 365 – 370; b) E. Vedejs, M.
Jure, Angew. Chem. 2005, 117, 4040 – 4069; Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 3974 – 4001.
[13] a) T. Boerresen, N. K. Klausen, L. M. Larsen, H. Soerensen,
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1989, 993, 108 – 115; b) N. Connil, Y.
Le Breton, X. Dousset, Y. Auffray, A. Rince, H. Prevost, Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 3537 – 3544.
[14] J. Q. Liu, S. Ito, T. Dairi, N. Itoh, S. Shimizu, H. Yamada, Appl.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998, 49, 702 – 708.
[15] DYKAT: a) asymmetric allyllic alkylation: B. M. Trost, Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 2002, 50, 1 – 14, and references therein; b) chemo-
enzymatic desymmetrization of 1,3-diols: M. Edin, J. Steinreiber,
J.-E. Bꢀckvall, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 5761 – 5766.
[16] Organocatalytic DYKAT: E. Reyes, A. Cordova, Tetrahedron
Lett. 2005, 46, 6605 – 6609.
explained by inhibitory effects of MnCl2 or dTA on l-TyrDC;
these effects will be investigated in more detail in the near
future. However, delayed addition of lTA/dTA (after 24 h)
yielded enantiopure 2 (Table 1, entries 2 and 11, ee > 99% R)
as well as improved conversion (HPLC 67%, isolated product
58%). Similar results were obtained at pH 6.0 and 6.5
(Table 1, entries 3–6). Higher pH values (7.0 and 7.5,
entries 7–10) resulted in a decreased yield because of the
low activity of l-TyrDC at pH > 6.5 (optimum pH: 5.5). The
excellent ee values of 2 together with the good yields (pH 5.5–
6.5) show that all three enzymes collaborate well. Further-
more, the kinetic limitation—low Cb selectivity in the lTA-
catalyzed reaction—is overcome and enantiopure (R)-2 is
obtained in yields of over 50%.
In summary, the protocols described herein overcome the
thermodynamic (DYKAT) and the kinetic (KAT/DYKAT)
limitations of reactions catalyzed by l-threonine aldolase.
The first bienzymatic DYKAT involves an aldolase with low
selective and a decarboxylase with high diastereoselectivity.
By applying this approach we were able to shift the aldol
reaction of glycine and benzaldehyde to quantitative con-
version and to improve the low Cb selectivity. A KAT/
[17] a) O. Pamies, J.-E. Baeckvall, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3247 – 3261;
b) H. Pellissier, Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 8291 – 8327.
1626
ꢀ 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1624 –1626