Enantioselective Hydrogenation of N-Acetyldehydroamino Acids
FULL PAPERS
Catalytic Hydrogenations and Product Analysis
Acknowledgements
Hydrogenations were carried out using a conventional glass
hydrogenation apparatus or a stainless steel autoclave
equipped with a glass liner and an automatic pressure re-
corder. In a typical run the catalyst was pretreated by stir-
ring the given amount of catalyst in the solvent for 0.5 h
Financial support by the Hungarian National Science Foun-
dation (OTKA Grants TS 044690 and T 048764) is highly ap-
preciated. Gy. Sz. is grateful for the financial support of HAS
through Bolyai Jµnos Research grant.
under H at 297 K followed by addition of the modifier, ben-
2
zylamine (when used) and the substrate. The reactor was
References
flushed and filled with H to the specified pressure and the
2
reaction was started by stirring (1000 rpm) the slurry. The
[
1] a) H.-U. Blaser, C. Malan, B. Pugin, F. Spindler, H.
H consumption was monitored and recorded, after the gas
2
Steiner, M. Studer, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 103–
uptake ceased the catalyst was filtered and the solution was
prepared for analysis.
The N-acetylamino acids resulting from the hydrogena-
tions were identified by GC-MS (Agilent Techn. 6890N
GC-5973 MSD) analysis. The initial rates were calculated at
1
51; b) H.-U. Blaser, B. Pugin, F. Spindler, J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem. 2005, 231, 1–20.
[
2] W. Tang, X. Zhang, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3029–3069.
[3] T. Sugimura, J. Watanabe, T. Okuyama, Y. Nitta, Tetra-
hedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 1573–1575.
1
5ꢂ2% conversions from the H uptake curves. For deter-
[4] Y. Nitta, J. Watanabe, T. Okuyama, T. Sugimura, J.
Catal. 2005, 236, 164–167.
2
mination of the conversions and selectivities including the
ee, the products were transformed in methyl esters using di-
azomethane ethereal solution. Unless otherwise mentioned
complete conversion and no significant side-products were
obtained. The corresponding methyl esters were identified
by GC-MS analysis and by comparison with products ob-
tained from commercial amino acid derivatives. Conversions
and ees were determined by GC analysis using HP-5890 II
GC-FID and Permabond -l-Chirasil-Val (25 m0.25 mm,
Macherey–Nagel) chiral capillary column. The enantiomeric
excess (ee%) was calculated with the formula ee%=100
jE ꢀE j/
[
[
[
[
5] K. Borszeky, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, Tetrahedron: Asym-
metry 1997, 8, 3745–3753.
6] Gy. Szçll o˝ si, S. Niwa, T. Hanaoka, F. Mizukami, J. Mol.
Catal. A: Chem. 2005, 230, 91–95.
7] Gy. Szçll o˝ si, T. Hanaoka, S. Niwa, F. Mizukami, M.
Bartók, J. Catal. 2005, 231, 480–483.
8] a) K. Borszeky, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1999, 10, 4781–4789; b) W.-R. Huck, T.
Mallat, A. Baiker, New J. Chem. 2002, 26, 6–8; c) M.
Maris, W.-R. Huck, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, J. Catal. 2003,
ꢁ
2
19, 52–58; d) G. Fogassy, A. Tungler, A. LØvai, J.
A
C
H
T
R
E
U
N
G
(E +E ), where E and E are the concentrations
1
2 1 2 1 2
Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2003, 192, 189–194; e) K. Sz o˝ ri,
Gy. Szçll o˝ si, K. Felfçldi, M. Bartók, React. Kinet.
Catal. Lett. 2005, 84, 151–156.
of the corresponding product enantiomers. The absolute
configurations of the excess products were determined by
comparison of the retention times of the products with the
retention times of compounds prepared from commercially
available optically pure substances. The optically pure
methyl esters (10 and 11) were prepared by acylation of l-
phenylalanine methyl ester hydrochloride (ꢁ99%, Fluka)
and l-alanine methyl ester hydrochloride (ꢁ99%, Fluka)
using acetic anhydride/pyridine as shown in Scheme 2.
[9] a) M. Studer, H.-U. Blaser, C. Exner, Adv. Synth. Catal.
2003, 345, 45–65; b) A. Tungler, ꢂ. Sꢃpos, V. Hµda,
Current Org. Chem. 2006, 10, 1569–1583.
10] a) K. Borszeky, T. Mallat, R. Aeschiman, W. B. Schwe-
izer, A. Baiker, J. Catal. 1996, 161, 451–458; b) Gy.
Szçll o˝ si, I. Kun, M. Bartók, Chirality 2001, 13, 619–
[
[
6
24.
11] A. Tungler, ꢄ. Fꢅrcht, Zs. P. Karancsi, G. Tóth, T.
The isolated products (see Entry 11, Table 1 and Entry 10,
MµthØ, L. Heged u˝ s, ꢄ. Sµndi, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
1
Table 3) were identified by H NMRanalysis (Bruker
AVANCE DRX-500 spectrometer), their spectra were iden-
tical with those previously published. Their optical purity
was determined by optical rotation measurements (Polamat
A polarimeter) and using literature values.
1
999, 139, 239–244.
[
[
[
12] H.-U. Blaser, H. Hçnig, M. Studer, C. Wedemeyer-Exl,
[27]
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 1999, 139, 253–257.
13] N. J. Colston, R. P. K. Wells, P. B. Wells, G. J. Hutchings,
Catal. Lett. 2005, 103, 117–120.
14] M. Gomes Jr., R. Hernµndez-ValdØs, C. E. S. J. Mar-
ques, M. L. Bastos, D. A. G. Aranda, O. A. C. Antunes,
React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 2006, 87, 19–24.
[27]
[
[
15] a) Y. Nitta, Chem. Lett. 1999, 635–636; b) Y. Nitta,
Top. Catal. 2000, 13, 179–185.
16] M. von Arx, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, Angew. Chem. 2001,
1
13, 2369–2372; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2302–
2
305.
[
17] a) H. U. Blaser, H. P. Jalett, W. Lottenbach, M. Studer,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12675–12682; b) S. Diezi,
A. Szabo, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, Tetrahedron: Asymme-
try 2003, 14, 2573–2577; c) R. Hess, A. Vargas, T.
Mallat, T. Bꢅrgi, A. Baiker, J. Catal. 2004, 222, 117–
Scheme 2. Preparation of product methyl esters with known
absolute configurations.
1
28; d) E. Toukoniitty, I. Busygin, R. Leino, D. Y.
Murzin, J. Catal. 2004, 227, 210–216; e) S. Diezi, T.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 405 – 410
ꢀ 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
409