S.O. Tümay, S. Yeşilot
Journal of Photochemistry & Photobiology A: Chemistry 372 (2019) 156–167
white solid, yield: 233.0 mg, 94.8%. 1H NMR (CDCl
12 H), 5.47 (s, 6 H), 4.77 (s, 6 H), 4.55 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 6 H), 4.10 (t,
J = 7.2 Hz, 6 H), 3.73 (t, J = 6.5 Hz, 6 H), 3.41-3.36 (m, 30 H), 3.18 (s,
3
1
-d ), 298 K, δ
(
ppm); 7.77 (s, 1 H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 4 H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H),
7
2
.35 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.17 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1 H), 5.30 (d, J = 5.8 Hz,
9 H); 13C NMR (CDCl
128.45, 126.36, 125.71, 125.02, 124.66, 124.30, 123.05, 120.02,
71.87, 70.49, 70.44, 67.52, 66.44, 64.73, 64.02, 62.10, 58.97, 51.99;
3 1
-d ), 298 K, δ (s, ppm); 147.25, 131.34, 128.95,
1
3
H), 4.48 (t, J = 4.6 Hz, 2 H), 4.08 (t, J = 4.6 Hz, 2 H); C NMR
-d ), 298 K, δ (s, ppm); 156.04, 134.39, 129.59, 129.19, 127.63,
26.90, 126.50, 124.10, 123.95, 118.7, 107.23, 61.83, 61.06, 52.83;
(
CDCl
3
1
31
+
1
P NMR (CDCl
[M] : 1621.670).
3
-d
1
) δ = 17.04 (s, 3 P); [M] : 1621.018 m/z (calc.
+
+
+
[
M] : 269,173 m/z (calc. [M] : 269,300).
2
1
.3.2. 2-(4-((anthracen-9-ylmethoxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)ethan-
-ol (4)
2.4. Samples
9
-((prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)methyl)anthracene (60.0 mg, 0.244 mmol),
Three different types of environmental water samples were col-
lected from Gebze/Kocaeli and İkitelli/İstanbul in Turkey. Blue band
filter paper was used to filter the samples, after filtration process, all
Cu(I)Br (58.2 mg, 0.406 mmol), PMDTA (70.4 mg, 0.406 mmol) and 2-
azido-1-ethanol (17.7 mg, 0.203 mmol) were dissolved in dry di-
chlorometane (10 mL) under inert atmosphere. The resulting mixture
was vigorously mixed with magnetic stirrer for six hours at 25 °C and
water samples were acidified with HNO (70%) and they stored at 4 °C
3
prior to analysis.
when the reaction was finished, extraction with dichloromethane/H
2
O
were performed and the organic phase was dried over Na SO . Organic
2
4
2.5. Developed spectrofluorimetric determination methods (CBTSRs-FL) for
solvent was removed by rotary evaporator and column chromatography
was performed to purify the crude product. Silica gel and n-hexane:THF
iron in environmental water samples
(
2:1, v/v) were used as stationary and mobil phase, respectively.
The developed CBTSRs-FL methods are based on selective com-
plexation of CBTSRs with iron prior to spectrofluorimetric determina-
tion without any preconcentration processes (Fig. 1). The fluorescence
emission signals of CBTSRs were originated from blue emission of
naphthalene or anthracene, which nearly completely quenched with
complexation of iron. Fe2+ ions contained in environmental water
1
Compund 4, yellow solid, yield: 65.5 mg, 96.7%. H NMR (THF-d
2
1
8
),
98 K, δ (ppm); 8.48-8.40 (m, 3 H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.79 (s,
H), 7.50-7.41 (m, 4 H), 6.91 (s, 1 H), 5.55 (s, 2 H), 4.80 (s, 2 H), 4.39
1
3
(
t, J = 4.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.85 (t, J = 4.9 Hz, 2 H); C NMR (THF-d
8
), 298 K,
δ (s, ppm); 145.47, 137.90, 132.31, 131.82, 130.08, 129.36, 128.60,
1
z (calc. [M] : 333.390).
+
3+
26.42, 125.66, 124.04, 64.64, 61.45, 53.15, 47.49; [M] : 333.142 m/
samples were oxidized to Fe by the acidic medium which was used in
+
storage. Therefore, developed3 methods were based on spectro-
+
fluorimetric determination of Fe . The iron content of environmental
2
.3.3. cis-2,4,6-tris(methyltriglycol)-tris(2-(4-((naphthalen-2-yloxy)
methyl)-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)ethoxy)cyclotriphosphazene (CBTSR-1)
-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)naphthalene (555.0 mg, 3.050 mmol), Cu(I)Br
525.0 mg, 3.660 mmol), PMDTA (634.0 mg, 3.660 mmol) and com-
pound 2 (539.0 mg, 0.610 mmol) were dissolved in dry dichlorometane
10 mL) under inert atmosphere. The resulting mixture was vigorously
mixed with magnetic stirrer for six hours at 25 °C and when the reaction
was finished, extraction with dichloromethane/H O were performed
and the organic phase was dried over Na SO . Organic solvent was
water samples was determined by calibration curves for both methods
and generated with different quantity of Fe3+ of water samples which
was calculated according to (1);
2
(
[
(F0 − F)/F0] − n
CFe3+
=
m
(1)
(
where F
0
, F, (F
0
-F)/F
0
and CFe3+ represent fluorescence emission re-
3
+
sponse of CBTSRs in the absence of Fe , fluorescence emission re-
sponse of CBTSRs - Fe3+ complexes, relative fluorescence intensity
changing and iron quantity of the water sample at μM levels. Also, m is
the slope of the calibration curves and n is the intercept (line crosses the
axis). The emission signals of CBTSRs were originated from blue
emission of naphthalene or anthracene which were quenched with in-
creasing amount of Fe . These gradual quenching were proportional
up to 400 μM of Fe and 350 μM of Fe for CBTSR-1 and CBTSR-2,
respectively, which were applicable for quantitative analysis of Fe in
environmental water samples. For quantitative analysis of iron amount
in water samples with CBTSRs, 0.250 mL of CBTSR-1 and 0.100 mL of
CBTSR-2 were added to individual volumetric flask (10 mL) from stock
2
2
4
removed by rotary evaporator and column chromatography was per-
formed to purify the crude product. Silica gel and n-hexane:THF (6:1,
v/v) were used as stationary and mobil phase, respectively. CBTSR-1,
1
viscous liquid, yield: 803.0 mg, 92.1%. H NMR (DMSO-d
6
), 298 K, δ
3+
(
ppm); 8.11 (s, 3 H), 7.65 (dd, J = 8.1, 4.8 Hz, 9 H), 7.34 (d, J = 2.0 Hz,
3+
3+
3
H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3 H), 7.12 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3 H), 7.02 (dd,
3+
J = 8.9, 2.4 Hz, 3 H), 5.10 (s, 6 H), 4.51 (t, J = 4.7 Hz, 6 H), 4.05 (t,
J = 4.7 Hz, 6 H), 3.68 (t, J = 5.3 Hz, 6 H), 3.37-3.35 (m, 24 H), 3.25-
1
3
3
1
1
3 1
.23 (m, 6 H), 3.05 (s, 9 H); C NMR (CDCl -d ), 298 K, δ (s, ppm);
56.15, 134.42, 129.57, 129.12, 127.6, 126.93, 126.48, 123.88, 118.6,
−
4
-3
07.20, 71.88, 70.56, 70.48, 65.42, 64.12, 61.82, 58.96, 50.08, 46.51;
solution of CBTSR-1 (4 × 10
M) and CBTSR-2 (1 × 10 M) and
3
1
+
P NMR (CDCl
3
-d
1
) δ = 17.28 (s, 3 P); [M+H] : 1429,753 m/z (calc.
then, 7.250 mL of ethanol for CBTSR-1 and 8.9 mL of ethanol for
CBTSR-2 were added to their own volumetric flask. After, (pH 7.0)
+
[
M] : 1429.410).
0.5 mL of Britton–Robinson buffer and 0.4 mL of environmental water
2
.3.4. cis-2,4,6-tris(methyltriglycol)-tris(2-(4-((anthracen-9-ylmethoxy)
methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)ethoxy) cyclotriphosphazene (CBTSR-2)
-((prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)methyl)anthracene (87.0 mg, 0.353 mmol),
Cu(I)Br (61.0 mg, 0.421 mmol), PMDTA (73.0 mg, 0.421 mmol) and
compound (62.0 mg, 0.070 mmol) were dissolved in dry di-
samples were added to volumetric flasks (10 mL) and they were filled
up to mark of volumetric flasks with deionized water. Then, obtained
mixtures were vigorously shaken during 20 and 25 s for CBTSR-1 and
CBTSR-2, respectively. For determination and optimization studies,
relative fluorescence intensity for CBTSRs-Fe3+ complexes were cal-
culated and recorded at 351 nm (for CBTSR-1) and 412 nm (for CBTSR-
2). Before spectrofluorimetric analysis, the accuracy of (CBTSRs-FL)
methods were evaluated with ICP-OES analysis and spike/recovery
measurements under optimum conditions.
9
2
chlorometane (10 mL) under inert atmosphere. The resulting mixture
was vigorously mixed with magnetic stirrer for six hours at 25 °C and
when the reaction was finished, extraction with dichloromethane/H
2
O
were performed and the organic phase was dried over Na SO . Organic
2
4
solvent was removed by rotary evaporator and column chromatography
was performed to purify the crude product. Silica gel and n-hexane:THF
2.6. Photophysical calculations
(
6:1, v/v) were used as stationary and mobil phase, respectively.
1
CBTSR-2, yellow viscous liquid, yield: 103.0 mg, 90.8%). H NMR
DMSO-d ), 298 K, δ (ppm); 8.59 (s, 3 H), 8.34 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 6 H),
.06 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 6 H), 8.04 (s, 3 H), 7.51 (dt, J = 13.6, 6.2 Hz,
In order to evaluate of the photophysical properties of CBTSRs,
fluorescence quantum yields (ΦF) were determined by the comparative
method (Eq. (2)) [48].
(
8
6
158