596
K. Khemakhem et al. / Dyes and Pigments 99 (2013) 594e598
2
.1.5. 7-Methoxy-3-(2-thienyl)-2H-1-benzopyran-2-imine (2b)
Yield: 68%. M.p. 192 C. H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6):
The spectroscopic characteristics of the six compounds were
ꢀ
1
studied in chloroform and are collated in Table 1. For all com-
pounds, the absorption spectra showed only one intense band
above 300 nm, without any fine vibronic structure. The dimers
absorbed at slightly longer wavelengths than the corresponding
iminocoumarins, as could be expected from the extension of the
delocalized electron system. In contrast, the fluorescence excitation
spectra of all compounds were very similar. For the coumarin de-
rivatives, they were strictly superimposable with the absorption
spectra. This indicates that all the species visible on the absorption
spectra are responsible for fluorescence. For the iminocoumarin
monomers and, even more so, for the dimers a discrepancy was
noticed. It can be seen for example in Fig. 2 that the fluorescence
excitation spectrum of 2c was narrower than the absorption
spectrum and shifted to a shorter wavelength (Fig. 2). An expla-
nation would be that the absorption spectrum arises from a con-
tinuum of conformations, some of them being non-emissive.
The emission spectra of the six compounds were single, unre-
solved bands of similar shape. In both series of molecules, the
coumarin, iminocoumarin and bis-iminocoumarin derivatives had
almost the same emission maximum (Fig. 3). This suggests that the
emissive species have a similar conformation. The different elec-
tron withdrawing character of the oxygen and nitrogen atoms is not
discernible in this solvent. Interestingly, the thienyl derivatives 2a-c
emitted at longer wavelength than the phenyl derivatives 1a-c. This
is in line with the literature data. Actually, it has been reported that
direct attachment of thiophene subunits instead of phenyl groups
onto conjugated systems of Bodipy and porphyrin derivatives re-
sults in a bathochromic shift of the absorption and emission
wavelengths [37,38]. Such a shift cannot be explained on the basis
d
(ppm) ¼ 3.82 (s, 3H, CH
3
), 6.74 (d, J ¼ 2 Hz, 1H, H8), 6.82 (dd,
0
J ¼ 9 Hz, J ¼ 2 Hz, 1H, H6), 7.13 (dd, J ¼ 5 Hz, J ¼ 3.5 Hz,1H, H4 ), 7.49
0
(
d, J ¼ 9 Hz,1H, H5), 7.57 (d, J ¼ 5 Hz,1H, H5 ), 7.82 (d, J ¼ 3.5 Hz,1H,
0
13
H3 ), 7.95 (s, 1H, H4), 8.64 (s, 1H, NH). C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO):
(ppm) ¼ 56.16, 100.31, 111.21, 113.37, 120.15, 126.14, 127.07, 129.37,
d
ꢁ1
1
30.24, 135.19, 137.42, 154.01, 161.78, 163.19. IR (cm ):
n
¼ 1608
S: C,
5.35; H, 4.31; N, 5.44. Found: C, 65.16; H, 4.10; N, 5.27; HRMS: m/z
(
C]C), 1651 (C]N), 3282 (NH). Anal. calcd (%) for C14H11NO
2
6
þ
þ
calcd for C14
H11NO
2
S þ H : 258.0589 [M þ H ]; found: 258.0593.
2
.1.6. 4,4’-Methylenebis[N-[7-methoxy-3-(2-thienyl)-2H-1-
benzopyran-2-ylidene]-benzenamine (2c)
ꢀ
1
Yield: 43%. M.p. 165 C.
H
NMR (500 MHz, DMSO):
eAr), 6.78 (d,
d
(ppm) ¼ 3.82 (s,6H,2OCH
3
), 3.98 (s, 2H, AreCH
2
J ¼ 2.5 Hz, 2H, H8), 6.87 (dd, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, J ¼ 2.5 Hz, 2H, H6), 7.15 (dd,
0
J ¼ 5 Hz, J ¼ 4 Hz, 2H, H4 ), 7.28 (d, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, 4H, Ar), 7.31 (d,
J ¼ 8.5 Hz, 4H, Ar), 7.54 (d, J ¼ 8.5 Hz, 2H, H5), 7.62 (d, J ¼ 5 Hz, 2H,
0
0
13
H5 ), 7.84 (d, J ¼ 4 Hz, 2H, H3 ), 8.14 (s, 2H, H4). C NMR (125 MHz,
DMSO):
d
(ppm) ¼ 40.14, 56.44,100.29,112.60,113.51,121.01,123.70,
1
25.91, 126.92, 129.31, 129.65, 130.35, 136.83, 137.64, 143.36, 146.69
ꢁ
1
(
C2), 153.38 (C9), 162.04 (C7). IR (cm ):
n
¼ 1599 (C]C), 1652 (C]
N). Anal. calcd (%) for C41 : C, 72.54; H, 4.45; N, 4.13.
Found: C, 72.23; H, 4.67; N, 3.49; HRMS: m/z calcd for
C
30 2 4 2
H N O S
þ
41 31
H N
2
O
4
S
2
: 679.1725 [M þ H ]; found: 679.1738.
2
.2. Apparatus
ꢀ
Spectroscopic measurements were conducted at 20 C in a
temperature-controlled cell. The step between two measurements
was 2 nm. UVeVis absorption spectra were recorded on Hewlette
Packard 8452A and Helios Omega ThermoScientific spectropho-
tometers. Corrected steadystate fluorescence spectrawere recorded
with a Photon Technology International (PTI) Quanta Master 1
spectrofluorometer and a Perkin Elmer LS55 spectrofluorometer.
of inductive effect alone. More likely is the strong pep orbital
overlap of the thienyl ring and chromophore conjugated system.
The quantum yields showed large differences from one com-
pound to the other. They were quite high for the coumarin de-
rivatives (
F
¼ 0.58 and 0.84 for 1a and 2a, respectively), but they
were drastically reduced by one order of magnitude when passing
to iminocoumarins. For bis-iminocoumarins, the quantum yield of
1c was lower than that of the corresponding iminocoumarin, while
that of 2c was markedly higher (Fig. 3). The lifetimes were around
3 ns for every compound.
The fluorescence quantum yields (
F) of solutions were determined
2
2
using the classical formula:
F
x
¼ (A
s
ꢂ F
x
ꢂ n
x
ꢂ
F
s
)/(A
x
ꢂ F
s
s
ꢂ n )
where A is the absorbance at the excitation wavelength, F the area
under the fluorescence curve and n the refraction index [36]. Sub-
scripts s and x refer to the standard and to the sample of unknown
From the values of the fluorescence quantum yield and lifetime,
quantum yield, respectively. Coumarin 6 in ethanol (
F
¼ 0.78) was
the radiative k
calculated as k
that a high value for k
r
and non-radiative knr deactivation constants were
and knr ¼ (1 ꢁ )/ . It is generally admitted
indicates that the energy levels of the
taken as the standard [36]. The fluorescence quantum yields were
measured by exciting the samples at their absorption maximum.
The absorbance of the solutions was equal or below 0.05 at the
excitation wavelength. The error on the quantum yield values was
estimated to be about 5%. Fluorescence decay was measured with
the stroboscopic technique using a Strobe Master fluorescence
lifetime spectrophotometer from PTI. The excitation source was a
flash lamp filled with a mixture of nitrogen and helium (30/70).
Excitation was performed at 337 nm, and the fluorescence signal
was collected at the maximum emission wavelength of each com-
pound. Data were collected over 200 channels with a time-base of
r
¼
F
/s
F s
r
molecule favour high fluorescence efficiency, whereas a high value
for knr indicates that non-radiative deactivations, such as rotations
or vibrations, take place in the molecule and offer deactivation
channels that compete with the fluorescence process. In the pre-
sent case, as far as the monomers are concerned, the knr value was
higher for the phenyl derivatives than for the thienyl derivatives.
The most obvious possibility of non-radiative deactivation in the
monomeric compounds is the rotation of the ring in the 3-position.
0
.1 ns per channel. Analysis of fluorescence decay was performed
Table 1
using the multiexponential method software from PTI.
Maximum absorption (
), fluorescence quantum yields (
vation constants of the six compounds in chloroform.
l
abs) and emission (
l
em) wavelengths, fluorescence lifetime
(s
F
), radiative (k
r
) and non-radiative (knr) deacti-
3
. Results and discussion
labs (nm)
l
em (nm)a
Fa
s
(ns)
k
r
(s
ꢁ1
)
k
ꢁ1
nr (s )
The iminocoumarins 1b and 2b were prepared by reacting 2-
8
7
6
8
7
8
8
8
8
7
8
8
1
1
1
2a
2b
a
b
c
348
342
350
372
366
374
433
433
435
452
452
452
0.58
0.054
0.009
0.84
0.15
0.29
3.1 ꢃ 0.1
2.9 ꢃ 0.1
2.8 ꢃ 0.2
3.5 ꢃ 0.2
3.3 ꢃ 0.2
2.9 ꢃ 0.2
1.87 ꢂ 10
1.86 ꢂ 10
3.21 ꢂ 10
2.40 ꢂ 10
4.54 ꢂ 10
1.00 ꢂ 10
1.35 ꢂ 10
3.26 ꢂ 10
3.54 ꢂ 10
4.57 ꢂ 10
2.58 ꢂ 10
2.45 ꢂ 10
hydroxybenzaldehydes with arylacetonitriles, and the bis-imino-
coumarins were obtained by coupling iminocoumarins 1b and 2b
with p-phenylenediamine. Ion-exchange resins were used as cat-
alysts in both steps of this synthesis [32]. Coumarins 1a and 1b
were obtained by hydrolysis of 1b and 2b, respectively, in acidic
conditions.
2c
a
Excitation at
l
abs
.