Full Papers
Bismuth(III) nitrate pentahydrate, Bi(NO ) ·5H O (ꢁ98.0%), potassi-
Photochemical measurements
3
3
2
um bromide, KBr (ꢁ99.0%), ethylene glycol, EG (ꢁ99.0%), and De-
gussa P25 (99.5%) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich whereas
ethanol, C H OH (Grade AR 96.0%) was purchased from Friende-
The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) Nyquist plot
and transient photocurrent responses were determined by using
a CHI6005E electrochemical workstation in a conventional three-
2
5
mann Schmidt Chemical. All chemicals were used as received with-
out any further purification.
electrode quartz cell with 0.5m Na SO4 as the electrolyte. The
2
working electrode was prepared by drop-casting the slurry samples
onto a fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass slide with an electroac-
2
tive area fixed at 1 cm , while Pt and Ag/AgCl were used as the
Synthesis of pristine and oxygen-deficient BiOBr
counter and reference electrodes, respectively. A 500 W Xenon arc
lamp (CHF-XM-500W) equipped with an AM 1.5 filter was used as
the exciting light source.
BiOBr with abundant oxygen vacancy defects was prepared by
a highly facile one-pot EG-assisted solvothermal process. In brief,
KBr (5 mmol) was dissolved in EG (80 mL) and a stoichiometric
amount of Bi(NO ) ·5H O was added slowly into the solution. The
3
3
2
colorless mixture was stirred continuously for 1 h at room tempera-
ture and then transferred to a stainless steel Teflon-lined autoclave
of 125 mL capacity. The autoclave was sealed and heated at 1608C
for 12 h with continuous stirring. After completion of the reaction,
the autoclave was allowed to cool to room temperature naturally
and the resulting precipitate was collected and washed with etha-
nol and deionized water several times. Finally, the obtained
powder was left to dry overnight at 608C. The sample collected
was denoted as oxygen-deficient BiOBr. On the other hand, the
synthesis of BiOBr without surface defects (pristine BiOBr) followed
the same procedure as that of oxygen-deficient BiOBr, except that
deionized water was used as the solvent instead of EG.
Photocatalytic CO reduction experiments
2
The photocatalytic CO reduction experiments were conducted in
2
a custom-made, continuous gas flow reactor at mild conditions
(ambient temperature and atmospheric pressure). A 500 W Xenon
arc lamp (CHF-XM-500W) equipped with an AM 1.5 filter (to simu-
late solar light) and UV cut-off filter (to provide wavelengths
>
400 nm) was used as the light source. The experimental set-up is
depicted in Figure S8 in the Supporting Information. In brief, high
purity CO (99.999%) was bubbled through H O to generate a mix-
2
2
ture of CO and water vapor and the resultant mixture gas (reac-
2
tant gas) was fed into the reactor. Before each run, the photocata-
lyst was coated on the glass rods and the reactant gas was allowed
to pass through the quartz columns loaded with coated photoca-
ꢀ
1
talyst for 30 minutes at a flowrate of 50 mLmin to evacuate any
excess air and to ensure the adsorption–desorption equilibrium
was achieved on the photocatalyst surface. Then, the flowrate of
Characterization
The surface morphology of the as-prepared samples was studied
by using a Hitachi SU8010 field emission scanning electron micros-
copy (FESEM) and its elemental composition was analyzed by
using energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy. High-resolution
transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images and selected-
area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns were acquired by using
a TECNAI G2 F20 transmission electron microscope with an acceler-
ating voltage of 200 kV. For the sample preparation for TEM analy-
sis, the sample powder was suspended in ethanol and one drop of
the suspension was deposited on a copper grid. Powder X-ray dif-
fraction (XRD) patterns were obtained by using a Bruker AXS D8
ꢀ1
the reactant gas was adjusted to 5 mLmin and maintained at
this flowrate for 10 h under light illumination to study the per-
formance of the photocatalysts by collecting the product gas at
1
h intervals and analyzing it by using gas chromatography
(Agilent 7820A GC equipped with flame ionized detector (FID) and
thermal conductivity detector (TCD)). The yield of products (CH
4
ꢀ1 ꢀ1
and CO, in mmolg h ) was quantified by using Equation (1):
ðCfinal;CH4=CO ꢀ Cinitial;CH4=COÞ ꢂ volumetric flowrate of product gas
Yield ¼
Amount of photocatalyst used
Advance X-Ray diffractometer with CuK radiation (l=0.15406 nm)
a
ð1Þ
ꢀ
1
at a scan rate of 0.02 s over a diffraction angle range of 2q=58–
7
4
08 at an accelerating voltage and applied current of 40 kV and
0 mA, respectively. The electron spin resonance (ESR) spectra of
the samples were recorded with
JES-FA200). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measure-
ments were obtained by using a scanning X-ray microprobe PHI
Quantera II (Ulvac-PHI, INC.) with monochromatic AlKa
hv=1486.6 eV) X-ray source. Wide scan and narrow scan analysis
were performed with a pass energy of 280 eV (1 eV per step) and
12 eV (0.1 eV per step), respectively. Prior to deconvolution, all
a JEOL ESR spectrometer
Acknowledgments
(
This work was funded by the Ministry of Higher Education
a
(
MOHE) Malaysia and Universiti Sains Malaysia under the Nano-
(
MITe Long-Term Research Grant Scheme (LRGS) (Reference
number: 203/PJKIMIA/6720009).
1
binding energies were referenced to the adventitious carbon
signal (C1s peak) at 284.6 eV. Raman spectra were recorded at
room temperature by using a micro Raman spectrometer (Horiba
LabRAM HR Evolution) with 514 nm laser excitation. The absorb-
ance spectra of the samples were measured in the range of 200–
Keywords: bismuth oxybromide · CO2 reduction · oxygen
deficiency · photocatalysis · solar energy
[
[
[
[
8
00 nm by using an Agilent Cary 100 ultraviolet-visible (UV/Vis)
spectrophotometer equipped with an integrated sphere. The Ku-
belka–Munk (KM) function, F(R), and extrapolation of the Tauc plot,
1
/2
[
F(R)ꢂhv] vs. hv were employed to determine the band gap en-
ergies of the samples. Lastly, photoluminescence (PL) measure-
ments of the samples were analyzed by using a LS 55 PerkinElmer
fluorescence spectrophotometer at an excitation wavelength of
[
3
00 nm.
ChemCatChem 2016, 8, 1 – 9
7
ꢁ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
&
These are not the final page numbers! ÞÞ