D. Yang et al. / Organic Electronics 32 (2016) 179e186
181
mp. 214e215 ꢁC. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm)
d
:12.33 (2H, s,
are summarized in Table 1. In dilute solution, USQ-11 and USQ-12
exhibited very similar absorption profiles with the wavelength of
maxima absorption (lmax) of ~667 nm and full width half maxima
(FWHM) of ~1000 cmꢀ1, with a considerably high molar extinction
coefficient of > 105 Mꢀ1 cmꢀ1. In comparison with the absorption in
solution, the absorption bands of the thin films of the two USQs
compounds were significantly broadened (FWHM: from 900 to
3910 cmꢀ1 for USQ-11, from 1080 to 5060 cmꢀ1 for USQ-12).
However, quite different shapes of absorption bands could be
observed in thin film, the absorption maximum of the USQ-11 thin
film was red-shifted by 31 nm from the monomer peak in solution;
while 47 nm blue-shift could be observed in the USQ-12 thin film.
These drastic spectral changes are attributed to squaraines aggre-
gations. As we know, squaraines showed pronounced aggregation
features as they are known to form H- and J-aggregation in solid
films [24,25]. The H-aggregation displayed a blue-shift in the ab-
sorption maximum, which contributed to only a moderate increase
in the Jsc; while the J-aggregation exhibited a red-shift in the ab-
sorption maximum that resulted in a significantly increase in the Jsc
[11,26e28]. Thus, for USQ-11, the absorption peak exhibited a
bathochromic shift from 667 nm to 698 nm, which is probably due
to J-aggregation; while for USQ-12, the absorption peak showed a
hypsochromic shift from 668 nm to 621 nm, which is attributed to
H-aggregation. The branched two methyl groups of indolenine
eOH), 7.43 (1H, d, J ¼ 7.2 Hz, ArH), 7.38 (2H, d, J ¼ 8.4 Hz, ArH), 7.29
(1H, t, J ¼ 7.2 Hz, ArH), 7.18e7.10 (3H, m, ArH), 6.95 (1H, t, J ¼ 7.2 Hz,
ArH), 6.34 (2H, s, ArH), 5.92 (1H, s, ]CHe), 4.70 (1H, t, J ¼ 7.2 Hz,
eNCHe), 4.10 (2H, t, J ¼ 7.6 Hz, eNCH2e), 3.91 (1H, t, J ¼ 7.2 Hz, ]
CHe), 2.10e2.01 (2H, m, eCH2e), 2.00e1.91 (2H, m, eCH2e),
1.86e1.78 (2H, m, eCH2e), 1.77 (6H, s, eCH3), 1.70e1.62 (1H, m,
eCH2e), 1.53e1.43 (2H, m, eCH2e), 1.42e1.35 (1H, m, eCH2e), 1.03
(3H, t, J ¼ 7.6 Hz, -CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, ppm)
d: 173.7,
170.3, 162.9, 152.6, 144.0, 142.6, 141.6, 136.9, 128.2, 127.4, 125.5,
124.8, 122.5, 122.3, 113.6, 110.7, 104.7, 96.7, 87.7, 68.6, 50.3, 45.5,
44.2, 34.6, 33.8, 29.4, 26.6, 24.3, 20.3, 13.8; HR-MS (ESI): m/z [MþH]
561.2753, calcd.: 561.2756; purity: 99.2% (HPLC, eluent: THF/
CH3CN ¼ 1/9); elemental anal. calcd for C36H36N2O4: C 77.12, H 6.47,
N 5.00; found, C 76.71, H 6.70, N 4.91.
2.3.2. 4-((3-Butylbenzo[d]thiazol-3-ium-2-yl)methylene)-2-(2,6-
dihydroxy-4-(1,3,3a,8b-tetra- hydrocyclopenta[b]indol-4(2H)-yl)
phenyl)-3-oxocyclobut-1-enolate (USQ-12)
USQ-12 was obtained from the reaction of compound 3a
(297 mg, 1.11 mmol) and 2c (300 mg, 1.00 mmol) according to the
procedure described for the synthesis of USQ-11. The solid was
recrystallized from a 1:4 vol ratio of dichloromethane and meth-
anol mixture to afford green solid (270 mg, 49%), mp. 240e241 ꢁC.
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm)
d
: 7.73 (1H, d, J ¼ 7.6 Hz, ArH), 7.47
hindered the p-p stacking of USQ-11, thereby enhancing J-aggre-
(1H, t, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.38e7.31 (3H, m, ArH), 7.16 (2H, t, J ¼ 7.2 Hz,
ArH), 6.92 (1H, t, J ¼ 7.6 Hz, ArH), 6.26 (2H, d, J ¼ 3.2 Hz, ArH), 6.06
(1H, s, ]CHe), 4.66 (1H, t, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, eNCHe), 4.29 (2H, t,
J ¼ 7.6 Hz, eNCH2e), 3.90 (1H, t, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, ]CHe), 2.09e1.99 (2H,
m, eCH2e), 1.98e1.91 (2H, m, eCH2e),1.89e1.81 (2H, m, eCH2e),
1.70e1.62 (1H, m, eCH2e), 1.53e1.43 (2H, m, eCH2e), 1.42e1.36
(1H, m, eCH2e), 1.05 (3H, t, J ¼ 7.6 Hz, eCH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz,
gation; on the contrary, the benzothiazole segment showed a
planar structure, which is very beneficial for formation H-aggre-
gation [29]. Therefore, the totally different solid state aggregations
were attributed to their distinct steric effects. Determined by the
onset position of the absorption spectra of the USQs in the thin
films, optical band-gaps were calculated to be 1.53 and 1.52 eV,
respectively, for USQ-11 and USQ-12.
CDCl3, ppm) d: 182.1, 180.9, 169.8, 164.6, 164.3, 161.6, 161.3, 150.7,
144.5, 140.3, 136.5, 128.9, 128.1, 127.3, 126.1, 124.8, 122.7, 121.6, 113.1,
112.7, 103.3, 96.7, 96.5, 88.2, 68.4, 47.3, 45.4, 34.7, 34.0, 29.9, 24.3,
20.2, 13.7; HR-MS (ESI): m/z [MþH] 551.2005, calcd.: 551.2005;
purity: 99.6% (HPLC, eluent: THF/CH3CN ¼ 1/9); elemental anal.
calcd for C33H30N2O4S: C 71.98, H 5.49, N 5.09, S 5.82; found, C
71.46, H 5.58, N 4.91, S 5.56.
3.3. Electrochemistry properties
To estimate the energy level of the HOMO of these USQs com-
pounds, their electrochemical properties were investigated by cy-
clic voltammetry. As shown in Fig. 3 and Table 2, during anodic
scan, quasireversible oxidation processes could be observed in the
two USQs compounds, and their Eonset ox values were determined
to be 0.30 and 0.23 V relative to Fc/Fcþ for USQ-11 and USQ-12,
respectively. Accordingly, the HOMO energy levels of USQ-11 and
USQ-12 were calculated to be ꢀ5.10 and ꢀ5.03 eV, respectively, by
comparison with the Fc/Fcþ redox couple whose energy level
is ꢀ4.80 eV in vacuum [30]. In comparison with the USQ-11, the
USQ-12 possessed 0.07 eV higher HOMO energy level, which may
be attributed to its stronger electron-donating capability of 2-
methylbenzothiazole than that of 2,3,3-trimethylindolenine
group. Therefore, higher Voc could be expected when USQ-11 was
used as electron-donors materials to fabricate OSCs [31]. Moreover,
the LUMO energy levels of USQ-11 and USQ-12 were calculated to
be ꢀ3.57 and ꢀ3.51 eV, respectively, which are deduced from their
HOMO levels and corresponding optical band-gaps [15].
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Synthesis and characterization
The synthetic routes to the USQs compounds are illustrated in
Scheme 1. Intermediate 1b and 2b were synthesized similarly
starting with Knoevenagel condensation reaction of compounds 1a
and 2a, respectively, with the 3,4-diethoxy-cyclobut-3-ene-1,2-
dione. Then intermediate 1c and 2c were obtained by hydrolysis
of compounds 1b and 2b, respectively. Next, they were further
condensed with compound 3a to afford the unsymmetrical squar-
aines USQ-11 and USQ-12. Both of the two objective USQs com-
pounds displayed good solubility in common organic solvents, such
as chloroform (>10 mg mLꢀ1
)
and 1,2-dichlorobenzene
(>15 mg mLꢀ1). Moreover, high quality thin films of the USQs
compounds could be obtained through spin-coating from solution,
suggesting that they are very suitable for solution-processing. As
shown in Fig. S1 (shown in SI), both of the two USQs compounds
exhibited excellent thermal stability over 270 ꢁC under N2 atmo-
sphere (vide. Table 1).
3.4. DFT calculation
To gain further insights into the effect of different D subunits on
the electronic properties of these USQs compounds, quantum
chemical DFT calculations were performed. As shown in Fig. 4, both
of the two USQs shown similar electronic structures, their HOMOs
are delocalized on the whole molecular skeleton, while their
LUMOs exhibited a few difference, since the indoline groups
contributed much to the HOMO but little to the LUMO. As shown in
Table 2, the HOMO energy levels of USQ-11 and USQ-12 were
calculated to be ꢀ5.19 and ꢀ5.12 eV, respectively, and the LUMO
3.2. Optical properties
The UV-vis absorption spectra of the USQs compounds in
chloroform solution and thin films are shown in Fig. 2, and the data