Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
Table 1: Scope of the 1,2-trifluoromethylformylation reaction.[a,b]
tendency of B toward hydrogen abstraction for the formation
of undesired cyclic alcohols;[7,8] 2) selective control of pro-
miscuous reactivity, such as the competitive 1,2-difunctional-
ization of alkenes with oxygen-based nucleophiles, b-hydride
elimination, and other transformations of A with multiple
reactive sites;[2,9] 3) the identification of appropriate oxidative
conditions for the generation of the radical species while
suppressing the oxidation of the sensitive aldehyde group.
Herein we report the successful development of the first
radical olefinic 1,2-difunctionalization-type formylation by
either a 1,2-, 1,4-, or 1,5-formyl radical migration triggered by
either trifluoromethylation, azidation, sulfonylation, perfluor-
oalkylation, or difluoromethylation of unactivated alkenes to
afford diversely b-functionalized aldehydes (Scheme 2a).
Most importantly, this strategy could also provide convenient
access to various benzannulated nine-, ten-, and eleven-
membered rings for further transformation into different
types of ring systems including complex 6-5(6,7)-6(5) fused
rings and bridged rings with diverse functionalities (Scheme
2b). Such medium-sized motifs are challenging synthetic
targets, mainly because of the unfavorable enthalpic and
entropic parameters for the conventional cyclization-based
methods.[10]
The increasing importance of trifluoromethylated organic
molecules for the synthesis of pharmaceuticals and agricul-
ture chemicals has spurred vigorous research for the explora-
tion of more powerful and practical trifluoromethylation
protocols.[11] To this end, we initiated these investigations by
examining the reaction of 2-hydroxy-2-phenylhex-5-enal (1A)
with the commercially available Togniꢀs reagent[12] (2A). To
our delight, the 1,2-trifluoromethylformylation reaction pro-
ceeded smoothly in the presence of CuI (20 mol%) with
EtOAc as the solvent at 808C for 16 hours, thus giving the
desired b-trifluoromethylated aldehyde 3A (for structure see
Table1) in 64% yield and clearly demonstrated that the
remote radical 1,4-formyl migration was much more favor-
able than other reaction pathways in the current catalytic
system (see Table S1, entry 1 in the Supporting Information).
Upon screening the reaction conditions, we identified the
following protocol as optimal: the reaction of 1A and 2A with
a molar ratio of 1.0:1.5 in the presence of CuI (20 mol%) in
CH3CN at 608C for 16 hours (Table S1, entry 7). With the
optimal reaction conditions established, the generality of the
current catalytic system for the 1,2-trifluoromethylformyla-
tion of alkenes by radical 1,4-formyl migration was next
investigated and the results are summarized in Table 1.
Different linear alkenyl a-hydroxyaldehydes reacted to give
the products 3A and 3B selectively in 74 and 73% yields,
respectively. Moreover, the substrate 1C, with a geminal-
disubstituted alkenyl group, was also well tolerated and gave
3C containing an a-quaternary carbon center in 83% yield.
We then switched our synthetic target to test the 1,5-formyl
migration process. Gratifyingly, under reaction conditions
identical to those of the 1,4-formyl migration process, the
reaction of the linear substrate 1D proceeded smoothly to
generate 3D in 73% yield. The aryl-tethered substrates
bearing electron-neutral (1E), electron-rich (1F), and elec-
tron-deficient (1G) aryl groups proved to be suitable sub-
strates, thus furnishing the corresponding products 3E–3G in
[a] All of the reactions were conducted on a 0.20 mmol scale. [b] Yields of
isolated products based on 1.
56–82% yields. The substrate 1H, having an aryl ring a to the
alcohol group, reacted efficiently to afford 3H in 73% yield.
We also found that the desired product 3I, from a 1,2-formyl
radical migration triggered by trifluoromethylation of alkene,
was obtained in 84% yield in the case of the TMS-protected
a-hydroxy substrate 1I (Table 1c). However, treatment of the
substrate 1J under otherwise identical reaction conditions
hardly generated any desired product expected from the 1,3-
formyl migration, thus indicating that the migration transition
state, a four-membered ring, might be disfavored for generat-
ing 1J (Table 1d).
The scope of the reaction was further expanded to other
radical precursors. Unfortunately, our initial attempts to use
either p-toluenesulfinic acid or p-toluenesulfonyl hydrazide in
the presence of different oxidants as a way to generate the
sulfonyl radicals in situ for the reaction failed (see Table S2),
presumably because of the incompatibility of strong oxidants
with the sensitive formyl group under these reaction con-
ditions. In recent years, visible-light-driven photoredox catal-
ysis has become an ecofriendly and powerful tool for the
generation of various radical species under extremely mild
reaction conditions without the need for external oxidants.[13]
Therefore, we surmised that the use of photoredox catalysis
may be suitable for the development of olefinic 1,2-sulfonyl-
formylation. As expected, the reaction of 1A with p-toluene-
sulfonyl chloride (4a) in the presence of [Ir(ppy)2-
(dtbbpy)]PF6 (1 mol%) with 2 equivalents of Na2HPO4
under visible light delivered the b-sulfonyl aldehyde 5A in
71% yield (Table 2a) after a systematic optimization of
different reaction parameters (see Table S2).[14] Similar
results were obtained in the reaction of a series of alkenyl
2
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!