Mendeleev Commun., 2014, 24, 23–25
Table 3 Coupling between CH acids and allylic acetates in CH2Cl2 using
ILs as PTCs.a
2 (a) N. I. Simirskaya, N. V. Ignat’ev, M. Schulte and S. G. Zlotin,
Mendeleev Commun., 2011, 21, 94; (b) N. I. Simirskaya, N. V. Ignat’ev,
M. Schulte and S. G. Zlotin, Mendeleev Commun., 2012, 22, 317.
3 (a) M. A. Epishina, I. V. Ovchinnikov, A. S. Kulikov, N. N. Makhova
and V. A. Tartakovsky, Mendeleev Commun., 2011, 21, 21; (b) M. A.
Epishina, A. S. Kulikov, N. V. Ignat’ev, M. Schulte and N. N. Makhova,
Mendeleev Commun., 2011, 21, 334; (c) M. A. Epishina, A. S. Kulikov,
M. I. Struchkova, N.V. Ignat’ev, M. Schulte and N. N. Makhova, Mendeleev
Commun., 2012, 22, 267.
4 (a) H. Zhao and S. V. Malhotra, Aldrichim. Acta, 2002, 35, 75;
(b) P. Wasserscheid and P. Schulz, in Ionic Liquids in Synthesis, 2nd edn.,
eds. P. Wasserscheid and T. Welton, Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim, 2008.
5 (a) B. M. Trost, Acc. Chem. Res., 1996, 29, 355; (b) B. M. Trost and
D. L. Van Vranken, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 395; (c) Z. Lu and S. Ma,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 258; (d) G. Helmchen, U. Kazmaier
and S. Förster, in Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis, 3rd edn., ed. I. Ojima,
Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2010, pp. 497–641; (e) L. Milhau and
P. J. Guiry, Top. Organomet. Chem., 2012, 38, 95.
6 (a) W. Chen, L. Xu, C. Chatterton and J. Xiao, Chem. Commun., 1999,
1247; (b) Š. Toma, B. Gotov, I. Kmentová and E. Solcˇániová, Green
Chem., 2000, 2, 149; (c) I. Kmentová, B. Gotov, E. Solcˇániová and
Š. Toma, Green Chem., 2002, 4, 103; (d) J. Ross, W. Chen, L. Xu and
J. Xiao, Organometallics, 2001, 20, 138; (e) C. de Bellefon, E. Pollet
and P. Grenouillet, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 1999, 145, 121.
7 (a) Y. Sato, T. Yoshino and M. Mori, Org. Lett., 2003, 5, 31; (b) Y. Sato,
T.Yoshino and M. Mori, J. Organomet. Chem., 2005, 690, 5753; (c) L. G.
Bonnet and R. E. Douthwaite, Organometallics, 2003, 22, 4187.
8 M. Liao, X. Duan and Y. Liang, Tetrahedron Lett., 2005, 46, 3469.
9 (a) A. A. Vasil’ev, S. E. Lyubimov, E. P. Serebryakov, V. A. Davankov
and S. G. Zlotin, Mendeleev Commun., 2009, 19, 103; (b) A. A. Vasil’ev,
S. E. Lyubimov, E. P. Serebryakov, V. A. Davankov, M. I. Struchkova
and S. G. Zlotin, Russ. Chem. Bull., Int. Ed., 2010, 59, 605 (Izv. Akad.
Nauk, Ser. Khim., 2010, 592); (c) A. A. Vasil’ev, S. E. Lyubimov, E. P.
Serebryakov, V. A. Davankov and S. G. Zlotin, Mendeleev Commun.,
2012, 22, 39.
Product composition (GC) (%)
CH Allylic
acid acetate
Entry
PTC Ligand
products
unreacted 1, 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
5
2bb
2bb
2bb
2bb
2c
IL5 PPh3
IL7 PPh3
IL7 PBu3
IL11 PPh3
IL7 PPh3
IL7 PBu3
IL5 PPh3
IL5 PPh3
47 (3b) + 43 (3'b)
35 (3b) + 46 (3'b)
24 (3b) + 59 (3'b)
42 (3b) + 42 (3'b)
4 (3c) + 96 (3'c)
14 (3c) + 67 (3'c)
100 (6a)
16
19
17
10
—
19
—
41
2c
2a
2b
54 (6b) + 5 (6'b)
a Conditions: allylic acetate (2.4 equiv.), Pd(dba)2 (2 mol%), PR3 (~8 mol%),
K2CO3 (2.5 equiv.), IL (~13 mol%), CH2Cl2 (3 ml mmol–1), 20°C, 18–24 h.
b 1 equiv. 2b.
bring complications to analysis of the reaction mixture. In general,
reaction between 1 and 2b gave mixture of regioisomers 3b and
3'b in close amounts. In case of 2-methylbut-3-en-2-yl acetate
2c the ‘branched’ product 3'c was mostly formed (entries 5,6,
cf. ref. 6), the fraction of the ‘normal’ product 3c being somewhat
higher on application of tributylphosphine as the ligand (entry 6).
Disubstitution products never formed even with the use of excess
2c, moreover, the conversion of malonate 1 was often incomplete.
Less acidic diethyl methylmalonate 5 reacted smoothly with
allyl acetate 2a to give product 6a (Scheme 2, Table 3, entry 7).
In the case of but-3-en-2-yl acetate 2b the conversion of 5 was
incomplete (entry 8), while 2-methylbut-3-en-2-yl acetate 2c
gave none of the expected product.
In summary, based on extended number of both ILs and
substrates one may conclude that ILs can serve both as media
and PTC for TTR. The better reaction outcome is provided by
chemically inert ILs, while base-sensitive 1,3-dialkylimidazolium
ones form NHCs which reduce the catalyst activity. Most probably,
phosphine ligands should be preferable for the TTR, although
testing other 1,3-disubstituted imidazolium salts as additives,
especially with bulky substituents, and other reaction conditions
seems not undesirable (the NHC complexes were reported7 to
provide good yields under some other conditions and with other
substrates).
10 (a) S. E. Lyubimov, I. V. Kuchurov, A. A. Vasil’ev, A. A. Tyutyunov,
V. N. Kalinin, V. A. Davankov and S. G. Zlotin, J. Organomet. Chem.,
2009, 694, 3047; (b) S. E. Lyubimov, I. V. Kuchurov, A. A. Vasil’ev,
S. G. Zlotin and V. A. Davankov, Mendeleev Commun., 2010, 20, 143;
(c) A. A. Vasil’ev, I. V. Kuchurov and S. G. Zlotin, Mendeleev Commun.,
2013, 23, 84.
References
1 (a) T. Welton, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 2071; (b) S. Chowdhury, R. S. Mohan
and J. L. Scott, Tetrahedron, 2007, 63, 2363; (c) J. P. Hallett and T. Welton,
Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 3508.
Received: 20th August 2013; Com. 13/4188
– 25 –