complexes as effective Lewis acid catalysts for Diels-Alder
reactions motivated us to examine such complexes for the
carbonyl-ene reaction.8
%.8c The enhanced effectiveness of the silyl salens was
rationalized to be a result of sterics-based distortion of the
otherwise flat salen framework. Through similar reasoning,
we have developed a triisobutylsilyl(TIBS)-substituted C2-
symmetric Co-salen complex for promoting the carbonyl-
ene reaction of various 1,1-disubstituted and trisubstituted
alkenes with ethyl glyoxylate. These reactions proceed at
room temperature using catalyst loadings as low as 0.1 mol
% and produce γ,δ-unsaturated-R-hydroxy carboxylic esters
in excellent yields, enantioselectivities, and diastereoselec-
tivities.17
For the initial studies, we examined the carbonyl-ene
reaction of ethyl glyoxylate (2a) and R-methyl styrene (3a),
promoted by the cobalt complex of the commercially
available t-butylsalen ligand (Table 1).18 The reaction was
Over the years, C2-symmetric metal-salen complexes have
proven to be useful in a wide range of reaction types.9 First
developed in the context of epoxidation and epoxide opening
chemistry, these complexes have also been utilized more
recently as chiral Lewis acid catalysts for many other
reactions, including Diels-Alder,8,10 hetero-Diels-Alder,11
hydrocyanation,12 silylcyanation,13 aldol,14 alkylation,15 and
conjugate addition16 reactions. These complexes are easy to
prepare and have good benchtop stability. Importantly, the
steric and electronic environment of the salens can be varied
with ease. In connection with our enantioselective Diels-
Alder work, we sought to accentuate the subtle asymmetric
topology of the commonly used C2-symmetric salen frame-
work (1a) and found the corresponding silyl-substituted salen
cobalt complexes (e.g., 1b) to be superb catalysts for Diels-
Alder reactions, functioning at loadings as low as 0.05 mol
Table 1. Variation of the Cobalt(III) Salen Scaffold at the R1
and R2 Position
entry catalyst
R1
R2
time (h) yielda (%) eeb (%)
(7) For other reports on the enantioselective carbonyl-ene reaction, see:
(a) Kezuka, S.; Ikeno, T.; Yamada, T. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1937-1939.
Hetero-ene reaction: (b) Carreira, E. M.; Lee, W.; Singer, R. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3649-3650. Additions to imines: (c) Drury, W. J.;
Ferraris, D.; Cox, C.; Young, B.; Lectka, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
11006-11007. Enamines as nucleophiles: (d) Matsubara, R.; Nakamura,
Y.; Kobayashi, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1679-1681. (e)
Matsubara, R.; Nakamura, Y.; Kobayashi, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 3258-3260. (f) Terada, M.; Machioka, K.; Sorimachi, K. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2254-2257.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
-(CH2)4- t-Bu
-(CH2)4- TMS
24
2
84
77
93
97
98
95
97
34
51
46
54
62
90
98
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
t-Bu
TMS
TES
TIPS
TIBSc
15
2
2
2
2
1g
(8) (a) Huang, Y.; Iwama, T.; Rawal, V. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 7843-7844. (b) Huang, Y.; Iwama, T.; Rawal, V. H. Org. Lett. 2002,
4, 1163-1166. (c) Huang, Y.; Iwama, T.; Rawal, V. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 5950-5951. (d) Takenaka, N.; Huang, Y.; Rawal, V. H.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 8299-8305. (e) McGilvra, J. D.; Rawal, V. H. Synlett
2004, 2440-2442.
a
b
Isolated yield. Determined by chiral HPLC analysis using a Daicel
Chiralcel AD column (98.5% hexanes, 1.5% iPrOH). c TIBS ) triisobutyl
silyl.
(9) (a) Yoon, T. P.; Jacobsen, E. N. Science 2003, 299, 1691-1693.
For salen reviews, see: (b) Cozzi, P. G. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2004, 33, 410-
421. (c) Katsuki, T. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 131-147. (d) McGarrigle,
E. M.; Gilheany, D. G. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 1563-1602. (e) Katsuki, T.
Synlett 2003, 281-297. (f) Canali, L.; Sherrington, D. C. Chem. Soc. ReV.
1999, 28, 85-93. (g) Achard, T. R. J.; Clutterbuck, L. A.; North, M. Synlett
2005, 1828-1847. (h) Atwood, D. A.; Harvey, M. J. Chem. ReV. 2001,
101, 37-52. (i) Bandini, M.; Cozzi, P. G.; Umani-Ronchi, A. Chem.
Commun. 2002, 919-927.
carried out in methylene chloride at room temperature in the
presence of 5 mol % of catalyst 1a and produced chiral
alcohol 4a in >95% conversion and 28% ee, with the (R)-
enantiomer predominating. Solvent optimization studies
revealed that in toluene the product was formed in compa-
rable conversion and with higher selectivity (34% ee, entry
1). On the other hand, the product was formed in only trace
amounts in coordinating solvents such as diethyl ether and
(10) Yamashita, Y.; Katsuki, T. Synlett 1995, 829-830.
(11) Schaus, S. E.; Branalt, J.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63,
403-405.
(12) For example, see: Sigman, M. S.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1998, 120, 5315-5316.
(17) Hutson, G.; Rawal, V. H. Abstracts of Papers, 233rd ACS National
Meeting, Chicago, IL, United States, March 25-29, 2007; American
Chemical Society: Washington DC, 2007; ORGN-557 (Chemical Ab-
stracts: 2007:296584). While this manuscript was being readied for
publication, a report appeared on the use of C2-symmetric salen complexes
for carbonyl-ene reactions (4-92% ee). See: Chaladaj, W.; Kwiatkowski,
P.; Maker, J.; Jurczak, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 2405-2408.
(18) Other metal-salen complexes of the general structure 1a were
examined for this carbonyl-ene reaction, but none gave satisfactory results.
Under similar conditions (5 mol % of catalyst, toluene, 24 h), the following
results were obtained: Cr-salen, 28% ee, >95% conversion; Mn-salen,
7% ee, 33% conversion; Al-salen, 16% ee, 85% conversion.
(13) Chen, F.; Feng, X.; Qin, B.; Zhang, G.; Jiang, Y. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 949-952.
(14) Evans, D. A.; Janey, J. M.; Magomedov, N.; Tedrow, J. S. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 1884-1888.
(15) (a) Doyle, A. G.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
62-63. (b) Kwiatkowski, P.; Chaladaj, W.; Jurczak, J. Tetrahedron Lett.
2004, 45, 5343-5346.
(16) (a) Bandini, M.; Fagioli, M.; Melchiorre, P.; Melloni, A.; Umani-
Ronchi, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 5843-5846. (b) Taylor, M. S.;
Zalatan, D. N.; Lerchner, A. M.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 1313-1317.
3870
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 20, 2007