D. Nematollahi et al. / Electrochimica Acta 147 (2014) 310–318
311
Fig. 1. The structure of 3-indolylbenzoquinone (A), asterriquinones (B) and
synthesized compounds (C).
disc (3.2 mm2 area) and a platinum wire was used as a counter
electrode. The working electrode used in controlled-potential
coulometry and macro-scale electrolysis was an assembly of four
2
carbon rods (hard and porous) (31 cm ) and a large stainless steel
sheet constitute the counter electrode. The working electrode
potentials were measured versus SCE (from AZAR electrode and
Metrohm). 1-(4-(4-Hydroxyphenyl) piperazin-1-yl) ethanone,
4-(piperazin-1-yl) phenol, benzenesulfinic acid, 4-chlorobenzene-
sulfinic acid, 4-toluenesulfinic acid and 1,2-dimethylindole were
reagent-grade materials from Aldrich. Phosphoric acid and hydro-
quinone were of pro-analysis grade from E. Merck. These chemicals
were usedwithout furtherpurification.Moredetailsaredescribedin
our previous paper [17]. The glassy carbon electrode was polished
using alumina slurry (from Iran Alumina Co.). The structures of
reactants (1-3 and 4a-4c) and products (6a-6c and 10a-10c) are
shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. The structures of reactants (1-3 and 4a-4c) and products (6a-6c and 10a-10c).
2
.2. Electroorganic Synthesis of 6a-6c
ꢀ
1
M.p: 218–219 C. H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d
methyl), 6.69 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 6.88 (dd, J = 4.0 and 11.7,
H, aromatic), 7.29 (d, J = 4.0, 1H, aromatic), 7.36 (d, J = 11.0, 2H,
aromatic), 7.75 (d, J = 11.0, 2H, aromatic), 9.34 (s, 1H, OH), 9.86 ppm
6
) d= 2.35 (s, 3H,
A phosphate buffer solution (70 mL, c = 0.2 M, pH = 2.0) con-
1
taining 0.25 mmol (0.0275 g) of hydroquinone (1) and 0.25 mmol of
-toluenesulfinic acid (0.0390 g) (4a), benzensulfinic acid (4b)
0.0355 g) or 4-chlorobenzenesulfinic acid (4c) (0.0442 g) was
4
(
13
(
s,1H, OH). C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d
18.5 (C-2), 122.7 (C-3), 126.4 (C-8), 127.9 (C-9), 129.2 (C-6), 138.5
C-7), 143.5 (C-10), 148.1 (C-1), 149.4 ppm (C-4). IR (KBr) = 3283
broad, O-H), 3066 (weak, C-H), 3040 (weak, C-H), 1465 (strong
C=C),1284 (strong, S=O),1222 (strongC-O),1140 (strong, S=O),1088,
77, 818, 657 cm . MS (EI, 70 eV, m/z) (relative intensity): 268
6
) d= 21.0 (C-11),113.7 (C-5),
1
subjected to electrolysis at 0.35 V versus SCE, in a divided cell. The
electrolysis was terminated when the current decayed to 5% of its
original value. The precipitated solid was collected by filtration and
was washed several times with water. After purification and re-
crystallization in hot ethanol, the products were characterized by
IR, H NMR, C NMR, MS and elemental analysis. In the second
method, a phosphate buffer solution (70 mL, c = 0.2 M, pH = 2.0)
containing 0.25 mmol of 4-(piperazin-1-yl) phenol (0.0445 g) (2)
or 1-(4-(4-hydroxyphenyl) piperazin-1-yl) ethanone (0.0551 g) (3)
was subjected to electrolysis at 0.40 V versus SCE in a divided cell.
At the end of electrolysis 0.25 mmol of 4-toluenesulfinic acid (4a),
benzensulfinic acid (4b) or 4-chlorobenzenesulfinic acid (4c) was
added to solution and after stirring for 10 min the precipitated
solid was collected by filtration and after purification as described
above, they were characterized.
(
(
n
À1
8
(
+
1
13
M + 4H, 100), 201 (9), 176 (10), 112 (43), 84 (15).
2
10 4
.2.2. 2-(Phenylsulfonyl) benzene-1,4-diol (C12H O S) (6b)
OH
O
S
1
8
6
7
2
3
9
10
O
5
8
4
9
OH
M.p: 200–201 C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d
ꢀ
)
d
= 6.72 (d,
J = 11.6 Hz,1H, aromatic), 6.90 (dd, J = 3.9 and 11.6 Hz,1H, aromatic),
.31 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.55 (t, J = 10.4 Hz, 2H, aromatic),
.64 (t, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H, aromatic), 7.87 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, 2H, aromatic),
2
.2.1. 2-Tosylbenzene-1,4-diol (C13
H
12
O
4
S) (6a)
6
7
OH
O
S
O
7
1
8
9
13
9.63 ppm (broad, 2H, OH). C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d
C-5), 118.5 (C-2), 122.9 (C-3), 126.0 (C-8), 127.8 (C-9), 128.8 (C-6),
133.1 (C-10), 141.4 (C-7), 148.2 (C-1), 149.4 ppm (C-4). IR (KBr)
= 3291 (broad, O-H), 3066 (weak, C-H), 1755 (medium C=C), 1597
(strong, C=C), 1367 (strong, S=O), 1135 (strong, S=O), 998, 914, 819,
6
) d= 113.8
6
7
2
3
9
(
5
8
11
1
0 CH
4
OH
3
n