Deactivation of Key Eumelanin Building Blocks
A R T I C L E S
reactive intermediates upon absorption of UV light, whereby
they may be involved in UV-A-induced photochemical processes
believed to lead to DNA damage, whereas the large particles
efficiently dispose of UV-A energy through rapid nonradiative
decay processes. This size-dependent photoreactivity has been
suggested to be one of the contributing factors to the observed
variations in skin cancer rates among different skin types.
Steady-state fluorescence experiments have shown that the
emission spectra and fluorescence quantum yield depend on the
excitation wavelengths. Time resolved fluorescence and transient
absorption studies have been performed to elucidate excited-
interest of 5,6-dihydroxyindole photochemistry in relation to
the possible involvement of the circulating metabolites in
25
immediate tanning and in the erythemogenic response of skin
to UV radiation. In humans, the serum and urine concentrations
of 5,6-dihydroxyindoles increase dramatically following expo-
sure to sunlight, UVA (315-400 nm) or UVB (290-315 nm),
as well as during PUVA therapy, suggesting that these indoles
may play important biological roles in the response of skin to
actinic damage.
Herein, we provide the first experimental evidence that
DHICA oligomers have shorter excited-state lifetimes than
their monomeric building blocks, a result of direct relevance
for the photoprotective function of eumelanin. The present
work, in addition, determines the fluorescence spectra and
decay times of DHICA at neutral and acidic pH, as well as
in acetonitrile solvent. We show that the variation of spectra
and excited-state dynamics can be understood as a result of
excited-state intramolecular proton transfer, and we propose
this as the mechanism to achieve the photostability of
eumelanin, in analogy with what has been proposed for DNA
1
5-17
state dynamics and photoproduct formation.
Transient
absorption spectra of eumelanins are difficult to interpret,
presumably reflecting quite complex dynamics where several
1
7
processes occur simultaneously. Time resolved fluorescence
18-20
experiments revealed multiexponential decay of fluorescence,
while time-resolved polarization experiments on Sepia eumela-
nin resulted in an ∼80 ps depolarization time constant that was
1
9
attributed to energy transfer between chromophores. Overall,
these observations suggest the existence of several chromophores
2
1
26-28
within the pigment.
and other biomolecules.
Recently, evidence has been presented for mirror-image rule
violation in spectra of DHICA, and it has been proposed that
this phenomenon is due to convergent adiabatic and nonadiabatic
Results
22
Ionization States. Fluorescence measurements were performed
on the following substrates (Figure 1): DHICA, its O-acetyl
excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) processes.
Specifically, excitation into the S or S states of a catecholate
anion of DHICA, represented by dual bands in the absorption
spectrum, leads to emission from the S state of its proton-
1
2
(
DAICA), methyl ester (DHICA-Me), and O,O-dimethyl methyl
ester (DMICA-Me) derivatives, and the symmetric 4,4′-dimer
DHICA-dimer) and trimer (DHICA-trimer), both as the O-
1
(
transfer conjugate. It was proposed that intramonomer ESIPT
may function as an energy dissipation mechanism in the
pigment. Recent calculations have predicted that hydrogen shifts
may be involved in the photophysics of 5,6-dihydroxyindole
acetyl derivatives. Among the molecules studied, only the parent
DHICA is water-soluble. It possesses three potentially ionizable
functional groups, a carboxylic acid at C-2 and two hydroxyl
2
3
groups at C-5 and C-6. The pK
a
’s for these three groups are
(
DHI).
4
.25, 9.76, and 13.2, respectively, as determined by potentio-
Since eumelanin occurs in ViVo at a high degree of aggrega-
29
metric and spectrophotometric titrations. Thus, in the pH range
accessible to experiment, several ionization states and tautomers
can be populated. At pH 3, the fully protonated state dominates;
at pH ∼ 6, the dominant state has only the carboxylic group in
its deprotonated form (anion); at pH > 10, the dominant state
has both the carboxylate and the C-6 hydroxyl deprotonated
tion, it is very difficult to draw detailed conclusions regarding
the reaction mechanism. Already over 30 years ago there were
proposed several mechanisms in order to explain how the
2
4
photoprotection was achieved by the eumelanin pigment. It
has been speculated that energy dissipation occurs through
15
efficient radiationless processes in large aggregates; however,
no direct evidence has been available. In fact, investigation of
the photophysical and photochemical properties of 5,6-dihy-
droxyindole building blocks remains to-date the most useful
approach toward an understanding of photoprotective mecha-
nisms. Time-resolved fluorescence study of excited-state dy-
namics under different conditions might shed new light on the
mechanisms of eumelanin photoprotection. Added to this is the
(
dianion) (see Figure 1B). At pH values of physiological
relevance, i.e. 7.4, DHICA exists as a mixture of the anion and
dianion, in an approximately 1000:1 ratio, and the anion/
protonated form ratio is ∼200:1.
DHICA derivatives, DAICA, and oligomers (DAICA-dimer
and -trimer) were specifically designed to determine the effects
of functional group and molecular size modification on the
fluorescence properties and excited-state dynamics of DHICA.
Functional group modifications reflected by these compounds
include the following: O-acetylation, which substantially blunts
the electron releasing properties of the OH groups; O-methy-
lation, which also does so in alkaline medium, though to a much
lesser extent, preventing pH-dependent ionization; and carboxyl
group conversion to methyl esters, which increases the electron
withdrawing effects on the indole ring and precludes ionization
in aqueous medium and dimerization equilibria in organic
(
16) Nofsinger, J. B.; Ye, T.; Simon, J. D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105,
2
864–2866.
(
(
17) Ye, T.; Simon, J. D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 11240–11244.
18) Docchio, F.; Boulton, M.; Cubeddu, R.; Ramponi, R.; Barker, P. D.
Photochem. Photobiol. 1991, 54, 247–253.
(
(
19) Forest, S. E.; Lam, W. C.; Millar, D. P.; Nofsinger, J. B.; Simon,
J. D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 811–814.
20) Teuchner, K.; Freyer, W.; Leupold, D.; Volkmer, A.; Birch, D. J. S.;
Altmeyer, P.; Stucker, M.; Hoffmann, K. Photochem. Photobiol. 1999,
7
0, 146–151.
(
(
21) Meredith, P.; Powell, B. J.; Riesz, J.; Nighswander-Rempel, S. P.;
Pederson, M. R.; Moore, E. G. Soft Matter 2006, 2, 37–44.
(25) Maeda, K.; Hatao, M. J. InVest. Dermatol. 2004, 122, 503–509.
(26) Sobolewski, A. L.; Domcke, W.; Dedonder-Lardeux, C.; Jouvet, C.
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002, 4, 1093–1100.
22) Olsen, S.; Riesz, J.; Mahadevan, I.; Coutts, A.; Bothma, J. P.; Powell,
B. J.; McKenzie, R. H.; Smith, S. C.; Meredith, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2
007, 129, 6672–6673.
(27) Abo-Riziq, A.; Grace, L.; Nir, E.; Kabelac, M.; Hobza, P.; de Vries,
M. S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2005, 102, 20–23.
(
(
23) Sobolewski, A. L.; Domcke, W. ChemPhysChem 2007, 8, 756–762.
24) Pathak, M. A.; Fitzpatrick, T. B. The role of natural photoprotectiVe
agents in human skin, Sunlight and Man: Normal and Abnormal
Photobiologic Responses; University of Tokyo Press: Toyko, 1974.
(28) Sobolewski, A. L.; Domcke, W.; Hattig, C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
2005, 102, 17903–17906.
(29) Charkoudian, L. K.; Franz, K. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 3657–3664.
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 130, NO. 50, 2008 17039