EXTENDED p, n-PARTICIPATION IN SOLVOLYSIS OF SUBSTITUTED CHLORIDES
559
1
EXPERIMENTAL
1.79 g (40.5%). H NMR (CDCl
): ꢀ 1.74 (s, 3H), 1.81–
3
1
.83 (m, 2H), 3.36 (s, 3H), 3.54–3.57 (m, 2H), 4.21–4.25
13
Substrate preparation
(m, 1H), 4.85 (s, 1H), 5.01 (s, 1H). C NMR (CDCl ): ꢀ
3
18.04, 34.43, 58.73, 70.93, 74.49, 110.44, 146.89.
1
6
3
-Methoxypropanol (7). . To a stirred solution of
LiAlH (7.6 g, 0.20 mol) in 40 ml of dry diethyl ether, a
solution of methyl-3-methoxypropionate (6) (23.6 g,
Ethyl 4-methyl-7-methoxy-4(E)-heptenoate (10). A
mixture of 2-methyl-5-methoxy-1(E)-penten-3-ol (9)
(1 g, 7.69 mmol), triethyl orthoacetate (6.55 g, 54 mmol)
and propionic acid (0.18 g, 2.56 mol) was heated at
140°C for 1 h under conditions for distillative removal of
ethanol through a Vigreux column. The excess of
orthoacetate was then removed by distillation under
reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by
column chromatography on silica gel, eluting first with
light petroleum and then with light petroleum–dichloro-
4
0
.20 mol) in 50 ml of diethyl ether was added dropwise
at such a rate as to keep the reaction mixture refluxing.
Refluxing and stirring were continued for 3 h. The
reaction mixture was cooled, and the excess hydride
was decomposed with gradual addition of water. The
precipitate was washed with diethyl ether, and the
combined organic layer was dried over anhydrous
Na SO . The crude product was purified by column
2
4
1
chromatography on silica gel. Impurities were removed
with methylene chloride and the pure product with
methane (3:1). Ester 10 was obtained in 85% yield. H
NMR (CDCl ): ꢀ 1.11–1.13 (m, 3H), 1.77 (s, 3H), 1.94–
3
diethyl ether. The yield of pure alcohol 7 was 13.5 g
2.01 (m, 2H), 2.08–2.19 (m, 2H), 22.34–22.39 (m, 2H),
3.35 (s, 3H), 33.38–3.43 (m, 2H), 4.13–4.19 (m, 2H),
1
(
75%). H NMR (CDCl ): ꢀ 1.81–1.85 (m, 2H), 2.98 (s,
3
13
1
H), 3.35 (s, 3H), 3.54–3.58 (m, 2H), 3.73–3.77 (m, 2H).
5.31–5.35 (m, 1H). C NMR (CDCl ): ꢀ 13.91, 18.00,
3
1
3
C NMR (CDCl ): ꢀ 31.78, 58.60, 61.16, 71.33.
27.65, 28.18, 32.81, 58.54, 68.78, 74.10, 125.23, 143.05,
3
173.47.
3
-Methoxypropanal (8). Pyridinium chlorochromate
(
(
22.7 g, 0.11 mol) was suspended in methylene chloride
40 ml) and 3-methoxypropanol (7) (9.5 g, 0.11 mol) was
2,5-Dimethyl-8-methoxy-5(E)-octen-2-ol
(11).
Grignard reagent obtained from magnesium (0.97 g,
40 mmol) and iodomethane (5.7 g, 40 mmol) in 5 ml of
dry THF, as described above, was cooled to 0°C, and a
solution of ester 10 (4 g, 20 mmol) in THF was added
slowly to the cold mixture. The reaction mixture was
heated under reflux (1–2 h). When the reaction was
completed, and the Grignard complex was destroyed with
rapidly added at room temperature. After 2 h, the
oxidation was complete. The dark reaction mixture was
diluted with 10 ml of dry diethyl ether, the solvent was
decanted and the dark solid was washed twice with
diethyl ether. The product was isolated by filtration of the
organic extracts through Florisil and evaporation of the
solvent at reduced pressure. The crude product was
distilled (b.p. 108–110°C), yielding 3.4 g (36.8%) of the
pure product (8). H NMR (CDCl ): ꢀ 2.68–2.70 (m, 2H),
3
(
saturated aqueous NH Cl (2 Â 20 ml). The product was
4
extracted with diethyl ether (3 Â 25 ml). The combined
1
ether layers were dried over Na SO , the solvent was
3
2
4
13
.39 (s, 3H), 3.71–3.75 (m, 2H), 9.80 (s, 1H). C NMR
evaporated and the crude product was subjected to
column chromatography on silica gel, eluting first with
light petroleum–dichloromethane (3:1) and then with
light petroleum–dichloromethane (1:1). Evaporation of
CDCl ): ꢀ 43.66, 58.77, 29.45, 66.04, 201.03.
3
2
-Methyl-5-methoxy-1(E)-penten-3-ol (9). 2-Bromo-
propene (16.5 g, 0.14 mol) was dissolved in 15 ml of THF
and an aliquot of 1 ml of was added to magnesium (6.6 g,
the pooled alcohol-containing fractions yielded the pure
1
alcohol 11 as a viscous oil. H NMR (CDCl ): ꢀ 1.25 (s,
3
0
.27 mol) and a crystal of iodine at once. The mixture
6H), 1.38–1.42 (m, 2H), 1.73 (s, 1H), 1.83–1.88 (m, 2H),
was heated until the THF started to reflux. The remainder
of the 2-bromopropene solution was added dropwise at
such a rate as to maintain the mixture refluxing.
Refluxing and stirring of the reaction mixture were
continued for 1 h, then the reaction mixture was cooled to
2.26–2.33 (m, 2H), 3.31 (s, 3H), 3.34–3.36 (m, 2H),
13
5.28–5.32 (m, 1H). C NMR (CDCl ): ꢀ 17.70, 29.27,
3
29.90, 32.50, 40.16, 58.09, 68.45, 71.78, 121.34, 142.71.
1, 1, 1-d -2, 2, 2-d -Methyl-5-methyl-8-methoxy-
3
3
0
°C and 3-methoxypropanal (8) (3 g, 3.4 mmol) in 15 ml
5(E)-octen-2-ol (11-d ). The procedure is the same as
described above. From 0.17 g (7 mmol) of magnesium,
6
of THF was added slowly. Stirring was continued for 1 h
at room temperature. The Grignard complex was
1 g (7 mmol) of iodomethane-d (99% deuterium) and
3
hydrolyzed with a saturated solution of NH Cl, the water
0.55 g (3.5 mmol) of ester 10, 0.24 g (46%) of pure
4
1
layer was washed three times with diethyl ether. The
combined ether layers were washed with saturated
aqueous solution of NaCl and dried over Na SO . The
alcohol 11-d was obtained. H NMR (CDCl ): ꢀ 1.37–
6
3
1.42 (m, 2H), 1.72 (s, 1H), 1.83–1.88 (m, 2H), 2.25–2.33
(m, 2H), 3.31 (s, 3H), 3.34–3.36 (m, 2H), 5.28–5.32 (m,
2
4
13
solvent was evaporated and the crude product was
purified by silica gel column chromatography, eluting
with light petroleum followed by light petroleum–
dichloromethane (1:1). The yield of pure alcohol 9 was
1H). C NMR (CDCl ): ꢀ 17.50, 28.21, 31.42, 40.11,
3
58.23, 69.23, 71.80, 121.11, 142.31.
Chlorides 3 and 3-d . 2-Chloro-2,5-dimethyl-8-meth-
6
Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2002; 15: 556–560