M. J. Climent et al.
FULL PAPERS
-CH2-CCHO CH-), 2.21 (m, 2H, -CH2-CH CCHO-); MS:
m/z 210 (M , 98), 153 (30), 139 (34), 125 (41), 41 (100).
Reaction Procedure: Condensation of Benzaldehyde
and Heptanal
3-Hexyl-2,5-dipentylpentanedial (5): MS: m/z 324
All reactions were carried out under nitrogen atmosphere, in a
flask that was fitted with a reflux condenser. The flask was
immersed in a thermostatted silicone oil bath and the reaction
mixture was magnetically stirred. A mixture of previously
distilled benzaldehyde (50 mmol) and heptanal (10 mmol) was
placed in the flask. Once the mixture reached a temperature of
398 K, a specific calculated quantity of the catalyst was added
such that the final wt/wt ratio of catalyst versus the total sum of
reagents was 10%. Zeolites (HY and HBeta) and AlMCM-41
catalysts were activatedbefore reaction at323 Kunder vacuum
(1 torr) for 3 h. Samples of the reaction mixture were periodi-
cally withdrawn with a filtering syringe and analyzed by gas
chromatography (GC) (Hewlett-Packard 5990A spectrometer
provided with a 25-m capillary column of cross-linked 5%
phenylmethylsilicone).
(M , 5), 295 (43), 266 (10), 252 (100), 177 (10), 41 (35).
Acknowledgements
¬
The authors acknowledged financial support by the Direccion
General de Investigacion CientÌfica y Tecnica of Spain (Project
MAT2000-1392).
¬
¬
References
[1] a) Farbenindustrie, I. G., D. R. P. 284,458, 1927; b) L. S.
Payne, E. P. 0 392 579 A2, 1990.
Quantitative determinations were based on the measured
response factors of the reactants and reaction products.
Reaction products were identified by H NMR spectroscopy
(Varian VXR À 400 S, 400 MHz) and GC-mass spectrometry
(Hewlett-Packard 5988A mass spectrometer connected with a
25-m capillary column of phenylmethylsilicone).
[2] H. Hattori, Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 537.
[3] P. Mastagli, G. Durr, Bull. Soc. Chim. France 1955, 268.
[4] A. Sarkar, P. K. Dey, K. Datta, Indian J. Chem. 1986,
25B, 656.
[5] D. Abenhaim, C. P. Ngoc Son, A. Loupy, N. Ba Hiep,
Synthetic Commun. 1994, 24, 1199.
1
Yield for jasminaldehyde (3) was defined as the mmole
formed of this product divided by the initial mmole of the
limiting reactant (heptanal). Yield for 2-pentyl-2-nonenal (4)
was defined as the mmole formed of this product multiplied by
two (according the 2:1 stoichiometry for formation of 4) and
then divided by the initial mmole of heptanal. Selectivity to
jasminaldehyde (3) was defined as the mmole of this
compound divided by the total mmole of heptanal converted.
[6] M. J. Climent, A. Corma, H. Garcia, R. Guil-Lopez, S.
¬
Iborra, V. Fornes, J. Catal. 2001, 197, 385.
¬
[7] M. J. Climent, A. Corma, V. Fornes, A. Frau, R. Guil-
Lopez, S. Iborra, J. Primo, J. Catal. 1996, 163, 392.
[8] M. J. Climent, A. Corma, R. Guil-Lopez, S. Iborra, J.
Primo, Catalysis Lett. 1999, 59, 33.
[9] A. Kuiterman, A. M. C. F. Castelijns, H. J. A. Dielemans,
R. Green, EP 0771 780 A1, 1997.
[10] T. Lindblad, B. Rebenstorf, Y. Zhi-Guang, S. Lars, T.
Anderson, Appl. Catal. A 1994, 112, 187.
[11] P. Putanov, E. Kis, G. Boskovic, Appl. Catal. 1991, 73, 17.
[12] A. Corma, M. J. Climent, H. GarcÌa, J. Primo, Appl.
Catal. 1989, 51, 113.
[13] C. T. Kresge, M. E. Leonowicz, W. J. Roth, J. C. Vartulli,
J. S. Beck, Nature 1992, 359, 710.
[14] G. Bellusi, C. Perego, A. Carati, S. Peratello, E. Previde
Massara, G. Perego, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1994, 84, 85.
Spectroscopic Data of the Reaction Products
(E)-a-Amylcinnamaldehyde (3): 1H-NMR: d 9.54 (s, 1H,
-CHO), 7.20 (s, 1H, Ph-CH CCHO-), 2.52 (tt, 2H, -CH2-
C CH-Ph), 1.50 [m, 2H, -CH2-CH2-(CH2)2-CH3], 1.34 [m, 4H,
-CH2-(CH2)2-CH3], 0.89 (m, 3H, -CH3); MS: m/z 202 (M ,
12), 145 (9), 129 (48), 115 (100), 105 (28), 91 (14).
(E)-2-Pentyl-2-nonenaldehyde (4): 1H-NMR: d 9.36 (s,
1H, -CHO), 6.44 (t, 1H, -CH2-CH CCHO-), 2.34 (m, 2H,
1096
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 1090 1096