D. Valensin et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 26 (2016) 894–898
895
Figure 1. The reversible dehydration path that converts 9 into BV02 and vice versa. The chemical structure of the molecules is provided, alongside with atom numbering
scheme adopted in NMR experiments.
number of works to monitor the role of 14-3-3 proteins in different
pathological contexts.11,13–16
Recently, we have highlighted the possible chemical instability
of BV02 and have identified the reversible dehydration path
that may transform BV02 into the corresponding phthalimide
derivative (namely 9) and vice versa (Fig. 1).8 Molecule 9 showed
a similar binding conformation to 14-3-3r as BV02 by molecular
docking, and was equipotent to BV02 in cell-based high-
throughput screening conditions.8 However, it is still unclear if
the inhibition of 14-3-3 PPI is due to BV02 or the corresponding
phthalimide 9.
Driven by the research interest in clarifying this issue and by
the multiple requests received by scientists interested in using
BV02 as reference 14-3-3 PPI inhibitor, here we address the chal-
lenging characterization of BV02 bioactive form by means of
NMR spectroscopy. Results of our NMR investigation unequivocally
show that the compound is able to interact with recombinant 14-
Figure 2. Aromatic region of 1H NMR spectra of 9 0.1 mM in TRIS buffer at pH 8.0, T
298 K at different times.
3-3r, and clarify that the bioactive form is represented by the
phthalimide derivative 9.
studies. Lowering pH has also a strong impact on the kinetic of
9-BV02 conversion as shown by the NMR spectra recorded at dif-
ferent pH values (Supplementary information, Fig. S2). Table 1
The behavior of 9 in solution was monitored by NMR. In partic-
ular, the chemical shift variation of aromatic protons proved to be a
suitable tool to monitor the interconversion of 9 into BV02. NMR
spectra of 9, recorded in TRIS buffer at pH 8.0, indicate that the
molecule is not stable in solution but it rather converts in BV02
after 50 h (Fig. 2). In detail, NMR spectra recorded after 24 h show
the appearance of new resonances, whose intensity is gradually
increasing. On the other hand, the signals belonging to 9 are about
50% less intense after 24 h, to be completely vanished out after
50 h, thus indicating that the completed conversion of 9 into
BV02 does occur within this timeframe. The chemical identity of
BV02 generated by the path described in Figure 1 was further con-
firmed by MS spectrometry (m/z = 396.0).
00
00
reports the intensity percentage of H3 and H7 signals of 9 at dif-
ferent pH at both 0 and 24 h. These data clearly indicate that 9 is
more stable in solution at lower pH values, as very small percent-
age of BV02 is observed at 3.0–5.2 pH range. Overall, results of
these NMR measurements suggest that the conversion of 9 to
BV02 in solution may occur, and it is favored by high concentra-
tions and high pH values.
By taking into consideration the behavior of 9 in solution, we
decided to investigate its interaction with recombinant 14-3-3
r
protein at different pH values. The interaction between the two
molecules was tested by means of NMR spectroscopy, performing
tr-NOESY, and longitudinal relaxation rates experiments of the
ligand either in absence or in presence of sub-stoichiometry
amount (0.1 equiv) of the protein. As extensively reported for a
large number of small molecules,17–20 monitoring tr-NOEs is a
straightforward method for screening protein–ligand association.
As reported in Figure 3A, the NOESY spectrum of 9 alone shows
no cross-peaks, in agreement with the null NOEs effects typically
expected for a molecule of this size.6 On the contrary, the addition
The dependence of 9-BV02 conversion on concentration and pH
was further evaluated. Change in concentrations end up with not
identical kinetic behavior, as easily observed by comparing the
00
00
intensity of signals belonging to H3 and H7 of BV02 at different
hours for both 0.1 and 2.5 mM solutions of 9 (Supplementary infor-
mation, Fig. S1). At these conditions, the intensity of aromatic sig-
nals of BV02 is progressively increased to 70% and 81% for 0.1 and
2.5 mM solutions, respectively. However, it should be noted that
the bioactive concentration of 9 is in the micromolar range, as pre-
viously determined.8 Therefore, the effect of concentration in the
conversion of 9 to BV02 should be relevant only in concentrated
stock solutions, whereas it is expected not to affect biological
of 0.1 equiv of 14-3-3r at pH 3.2, ends up with the presence of
strong NOE correlations with the same sign as the diagonal signals
(Fig. 3B). NOEs cross-peaks involve all aromatic protons of 9, in
particular intense correlations between the phenyl and methyl