606
H. Leutbecher et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 604–607
Table 1
methanol mixture. When the model reaction was run in the ab-
Synthesis of 2-aryl-1H-benzimidazoles
o-phenylenediamine (1a) and benzaldehydes 6a–g under aerobic conditions using
laccase from A. bisporus as a catalyst
5 by reaction of equimolar amounts of
sence of the laccase from Agaricus bisporus but under otherwise
identical reaction conditions an inseparable mixture of a number
of compounds was formed. The composition of this mixture was
not studied in more detail.
Entry
6
Buffer/MeOH (v:v)
Time (h)
5
Yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
b
c
d
e
f
1:0
5:2
5:2
8:2
1:0
1:0
1:0
18
5
5
4
3
a
b
c
d
e
f
74
73
50
62
99
82
80
When the phosphate buffer was replaced by a 9:1 mixture of
acetate buffer (0.2 M, pH 4.4) and methanol and the reaction was
again performed in the absence of laccase only 18% of a 9:1 mixture
of 2-phenyl-1H-benzimidazole (5a) and the N-benzylated product
9a (R = H) was isolated (Scheme 4). In the presence of 2 equiv of
benzaldehyde (6a) the formation of 34% of a 20:3 mixture of 5a
and 9a was observed (Scheme 4, Table 2, entry 1). This clearly indi-
cates that the laccase-catalyzed reaction between 1a and 6a pro-
ceeds with much better selectivity and higher yield of 5a (Table 1,
entry 1) than the reaction in the absence of the enzyme.
Despite these findings, the reactions of 1a with the substituted
benzaldehydes 6b–g were also run in the absence of laccase
(Scheme 4, Table 2, entries 2–7).
5
3
g
g
air
buffer, pH = 4.4
r.t., 20 h
NH2
R
OHC
+
NH2
In all cases 1 equiv of 1a was reacted with 2 equiv of the respec-
tive benzaldehyde under air in either acetate buffer or a mixture of
acetate buffer/methanol and in the absence of laccase. It was found
that the reaction with the aldehydes 6c und 6d delivered mixtures
of 5 and 9 (Scheme 4, Table 2, entries 3 and 4). The crude product of
the reaction with 6g could not be analyzed in detail, but 6g was
clearly present among the other compounds. The benzimidazole
5g, though, could not be detected (NMR). The transformations with
6b, 6e, and 6f were the only ones where the benzimidazoles 5b, 5e,
and 5f were obtained as the sole products (Table 2, entries 2, 5 and
6)—but in yields considerably lower than those obtained in the lac-
case-catalyzed reactions (Table 1, entries 2, 5 and 6) and less pure
crude products.
These results unambiguously demonstrate that the laccase-
catalyzed oxidative transformation of 1a and 6 is superior to the
non-enzymatic version with respect to yield and purity of the
2-aryl-1H-benzimidazoles.
To summarize, a new application for the laccase-catalyzed aer-
obic oxidation of a C–N-single bond to a C@N-double bond has
been discovered, namely the efficient synthesis of 2-aryl-1H-benz-
imidazoles 5 by the reaction of o-phenylenediamine (1a) with
benzaldehydes 6 under mild conditions.
1a
6
R
R
R
N
N
N
+
N
H
9
5
Scheme 4. Reaction of 1a and 6 under aerobic conditions in acetate buffer (pH 4.4)
in the absence of laccase.
Table 2
Reaction of 1 equiv o-phenylenediamine (1a) with 2 equiv of benzaldehydes 6a–g
under air in acetate buffer (pH 4.4) and in the absence of laccase
Entry
6
Buffer/MeOH (v:v)
Product(s)a
Total yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
b
c
d
e
f
9:1
5:2
5:2
8:2
1:0
1:0
1:0
5a/9a (20:3)
5b
5c/9c (2:1)
5d/9d (10:3)
5e
5f
—
34
31
77b
99
82
15
c
g
—
a
All reactions were vigorously stirred using a magnetic stirrer for 20 h in acetate
buffer (0.2 M, pH 4.4) at rt under air.
References and notes
b
In addition, the product also contains a side product of unknown structure.
c
The crude product is a mixture of 6g and products of unknown structure.
1. (a) Morozova, O. V.; Shumakovich, G. P.; Gorbacheva, M. A.; Shleev, S. V.;
Yaropolov, A. I. Biochemistry (Moscow) 2007, 72, 1136; (b) Claus, H. Micron
2004, 35, 93; (c) Mayer, A. M.; Staples, R. C. Phytochemistry 2002, 60, 551.
2. (a) Witayakran, S.; Ragauskas, A. J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 1187; (b)
Mikolasch, A.; Schauer, F. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82, 605; (c)
Kunamneni, A.; Camarero, S.; García-Burgos, C.; Plou, F. J.; Ballesteros, A.;
Alcalde, M. Microb. Cell Factories 2008, 7, 32.
3. (a) Potthast, A.; Rosenau, T.; Chen, C.-L.; Gratzl, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 4320;
(b) Astolfi, P.; Brandi, P.; Galli, C.; Gentili, P.; Gerini, M. F.; Greci, L.; Lanzalunga,
O. New J. Chem. 2005, 29, 1308; (c) d‘Acunzo, F.; Baiocco, P.; Galli, C. New J.
Chem. 2003, 27, 329; (d) Wells, A.; Teria, M.; Eve, T. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2006,
34, 304.
4. (a) Mikolasch, A.; Niedermeyer, T. H. J.; Lalk, M.; Witt, S.; Seefeldt, S.; Hammer,
E.; Schauer, F.; Gesell Salazar, M.; Hessel, S.; Jülich, W.-D.; Lindequist, U. Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 2007, 55, 412; (b) Witayakran, S.; Ragauskas, A. J. Green Chem.
2007, 9, 475; (c) Niedermeyer, T. H. J.; Mikolasch, A.; Lalk, M. J. Org. Chem. 2005,
70, 2002.
reaction mixtures proved to be extremely simple as well. The prod-
ucts were precipitated by simple salting out using NaCl. After fil-
tration followed by washing with 15% aqueous sodium chloride
solution and then water, heterocycles 5a–g were obtained. In none
of the reactions the formation of the 2,3-diaminophenazine (2) or
any other side product was observed.
Concerning the mechanism it is assumed that the reaction
starts with the formation of the Schiff base 7 followed by an intra-
molecular ring closure to produce the N,N-acetal 8. The laccase-
catalyzed oxidation of 8 finally yields the benzimidazole 5 (Scheme
2).
5. (a) Pickel, B.; Constantin, M.-A.; Pfannstiel, J.; Conrad, J.; Beifuss, U.; Schaller, A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 202; (b) Ponzoni, C.; Beneventi, E.; Cramarossa,
M. R.; Raimondi, S.; Trevisi, G.; Pagnoni, U. M.; Riva, S.; Forti, L. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2007, 349, 1497; (c) Nicotra, S.; Intra, A.; Ottolina, G.; Riva, S.; Danieli, B.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 2927; (d) Nicotra, S.; Cramarossa, M. R.;
Mucci, A.; Pagnoni, U. M.; Riva, S.; Forti, L. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 595.
6. (a) Hajdok, S.; Conrad, J.; Leutbecher, H.; Strobel, S.; Schleid, T.; Beifuss, U. J.
Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 7230; (b) Leutbecher, H.; Hajdok, S.; Braunberger, C.;
Neumann, M.; Mika, S.; Conrad, J.; Beifuss, U. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 676; (c)
Leutbecher, H.; Conrad, J.; Klaiber, I.; Beifuss, U. Synlett 2005, 3126.
7. (a) Chauhan, S. M. S.; Bisht, T.; Garg, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 6646; (b) Niu,
S. Y.; Zhang, S. S.; Ma, L. B.; Jiao, K. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2004, 25, 829; (c)
Zuyun, H.; Houping, H.; Ruxiu, C.; Yun’e, Z. Anal. Chim. Acta 1998, 374, 99.
In order to elucidate the role of the laccase in the domino reac-
tion a number of additional experiments were conducted. When
the laccase-catalyzed transformation of o-phenylenediamine (1a)
and benzaldehyde (6a) was run in a 9:1 mixture of phosphate buf-
fer (0.2 M, pH 6.0) and methanol 5a was isolated in 64% yield. This
means that the yield obtained in the phosphate buffer/methanol
mixture is only slightly lower (10%) than the one achieved with
the pure phosphate buffer (Table 1, entry 1). Under these condi-
tions, however, the reaction can be more easily performed since
the benzaldehyde completely dissolves in the phosphate buffer/