6
KOLAREVIĆ ET AL.
|
below 200 μM. All 10 compounds showed to be more
potent DNase I inhibitors as compared with crystal
violet (IC50 = 365.90 ± 47.33 μM), used as a positive
control. Compounds 41 and 31 exhibited the most
potent DNase
I inhibition with IC50 values of
1
15.96 ± 11.70 and 120.04 ± 19.14 μM, respectively. On
the other hand, studied 2,5‐dialkylidene‐4‐oxothiazoli-
dines (Table 2), 6,7‐dihydro‐2H‐thiazolo[3,2‐a]pyridin‐3
(
5H)‐ones (Table 4), 2‐alkylidene‐7a‐methylhexahydro‐
2
4
H‐pyrano[2,3‐d]thiazoles (Table 5), as well as
a‐methyl‐2,3,4,4a,7,8,9,10a‐octahydropyrano[2′,3′:4,5]
FIGURE 1 The top‐ranked DNase I binding site, represented
by a gray‐red surface map
thiazolo[3,2‐a]pyridines (Table 6) did not show DNase I
inhibition within the investigated concentration
3
0
(
IC50 > 200 μM).
mechanism of DNase I has been already highlighted.
To obtain a more complete picture of the tested
compounds as DNase I inhibitors, 10 compounds that
inhibited commercial bovine pancreatic DNase I
It was confirmed that catalytic residues His 134 and
His 252 are a part of the ion binding site IV, which is
implicated in the cleavage of scissile phosphate.
Furthermore, several site‐directed mutagenesis experi-
ments on residues surrounding His 134 and His 252
demonstrated that single mutations of Glu 39 or Asp
168 resulted in very low activities on DNA mole-
(
Tables 1 and 3) were further investigated on their
ability to inhibit DNase I in rat liver homogenate. As a
result, three compounds, 31, 38, and 41, inhibited rat
liver DNase I with IC50 values of 164.74 ± 16.12,
3
3,34
1
90.34 ± 14.49, and 151.36 ± 15.85 μM, respectively.
cule.
The effects of these mutations also confirmed
The other seven compounds did not inhibit rat liver
DNase I with an IC50 below 200 μM.
the active role of Glu 39 and Asp 168 in the IV catalytic
2
+
site. In addition, the importance of Ca coordination
sites (sites I and II) for the structural integrity and
3
0
3.3
|
In silico studies
activity of DNase I is well known.
The interaction profiles of thiazolidinones with
DNase I domain are shown in Figures 2-4 and
Supporting Information Table S2. Compound 41, which
corresponds to one of the most promising inhibitors
reported in this series, showed dominant hydrogen bond
interactions with two catalytic histidines, His 134 and
His 252 (Figure 4F). Furthermore, identical interactions
with His 134 or His 252 were also observed for
compounds 4, 13, 18, 27, 31, and 38 (Figures 2-4;
Supporting Information Table S2). In addition, com-
pounds 4 and 27 showed H‐donor interactions with
residues Asp 168 and Glu 39 (Supporting Information
Table S2), which are also implicated in the cleavage of
3
.3.1
|
Molecular docking
The binding site residues in DNase I have been
identified using the Site Finder implemented in the
Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) software.
The results from the analysis highlighted that amino
acid residues like Asn 7, Arg 9, Glu 39, Tyr 76, Glu 78,
Arg 111, His 134, Ala 136, Pro 137, Asp 168, Asn 170,
Thr 203, Thr 205, Thr 207, Tyr 211, Asp 251, and His
2
52 constituted the binding pocket of the DNase I
structure (Supporting Information Table S1). Our
results are consistent with a recent study highlighting
the conservation of the amino acids involved in the
identified cation‐binding sites across DNase I and
DNase I‐like protein. It is worth mentioning that
inhibitor‐binding pocket, represented by a gray‐red
surface map, is within the region that interacts with
3
3
scissile phosphate.
The results from Supporting
3
0
Information Table S2 indicate that thiazolidinones 11,
29, and 40 were not found to possess any similar
interactions as previously discussed compounds. How-
ever, these compounds were observed to interact with
Tyr 211, Thr 203, or Arg 111 respectively, which
DNA octamer d(GGTATACC) (Figure 1).
2
The intermolecular contacts between thiazolidi-
nones and DNase I were analyzed using the ligand
interaction diagram of MOE suite. It illustrates the
existence of hydrogen bond, pi‐H, and H‐pi interactions
2
+
30
constitute the Ca
coordination sites I and II.
Compounds 11, 29, and 40 showed decreased DNase I
inhibition compared with other thiazolidinones (Tables
1,3), presumably because of their interaction with
(
Supporting Information Table S2). In addition, the
3
4
bond distances, bond energy, and binding free energy
between the inhibitor and receptor atoms were also
examined. Of note, the importance of Glu 39, His 134,
Asp 168, and His 252 residues in the catalytic
residues distal from the catalytic histidines. Conse-
quently, the presence of interactions with the most
important catalytic residues of DNase I binding site is
expected to enhance the efficiency of thiazolidinones.