5426
Schloss, Tran, and Eden: Photodissociation of Kr2F
fluorescence suppression spectra in the 280–360 nm region
are essentially identical, indicating that the yield of KrF(B)
in this wavelength range is also constant.
The uniform efficiency with which Kr2F is photodisso-
ciated over such a broad spectral range is interesting, particu-
larly in view of the fact that spontaneous emission from Kr2F
excited states higher than 4 2⌫ has not been reported in the
literature. Diatomics-in-molecules ͑DIM͒ calculations car-
ried out by Huestis and Schlotter2 for the lowest nine elec-
tronic excited states of Kr2F show that all are strongly bound
͑ϳ2 eV͒ with respect to the Krϩ2 ϩFϪ limits. However, only
one—4 2⌫—is stable with respect to the KrF(B,C,D)ϩKr
limits. Specifically, unpublished calculations by Huestis pre-
dict that the potentials correlated with KrϩFϪ(C,D)ϩKr are
dissociative. Since: 1͒ the symmetry species1 for the
KrF͑C ⌸3/2͒ϩKr and KrF͑D ⌺ϩ1/2͒ϩKr limits are B2 and
2A1, respectively, and 2͒ once spin–orbit effects are consid-
2
2
2
ered, the Kr2F͑6 2⌫͒ state has both A2 and B2 character,
then it is likely that the potential associated with KrF(C)
ϩKr is responsible for predissociation of the Kr2F͑6 2⌫͒
state. Similar considerations suggest that Kr2F͑9 2⌫͒ ͑which
is almost entirely A1 in structure͒ is predissociated by the
repulsive potential arising from KrF(D)ϩKr.
2
2
FIG. 5. KrF (B) excitation spectrum ͑top͒ and Kr2F͑4 2⌫͒ fluorescence sup-
pression ͑absorption͒ spectrum in the red and near-IR showing maxima at
655 and 710 nm attributed to the 6 2⌫←42⌫ transition of Kr2F.
2
1
It is, therefore, understandable that photoexciting the
9 2⌫ state of Kr2F would rapidly culminate in the production
of KrF(B→X) emission. The D and B states of KrF are
separated in energy by approximately the spin–orbit splitting
(B ⌸g←A ⌺ϩu ) of the parent Krϩ2 ion,1,8 was predicted by
Wadt and Hay1 but, to our knowledge, has not been reported
previously. Also, the peak intensity for this band relative to
that for the UV band is consistent with the ratio of oscillator
strengths calculated in Ref. 1 for the corresponding transi-
tions.
2
2
of Krϩ ͑2P3/2Ϫ2P1/2Ӎ0.67 eV͒. Consequently, the D ⌺ϩ1/2
2
state is ‘‘embedded’’ within the B state potential and a num-
ber of low D ⌺ϩ1/2 vibrational levels are nearly degenerate
2
with ЈϽ30 levels of the B ⌺ϩ state. Furthermore, at the
2
v
Aside from these two obvious bands, other faint but re-
producible structure appears in the 420–490 nm region and
in the vicinity of 600 nm. For convenience, the 400–550 nm
interval in Fig. 4 has been magnified and, although the signal
is too weak to make definitive statements, it is quite possible
that these features are associated with the 8 2⌫←4 2⌫ and
7 2⌫←4 2⌫ transitions of Kr2F that were predicted by Wadt
and Hay1 to peak at 478 and 603 nm, respectively. The latter
band appears to be partially blended with the blue tail of the
stronger 6 2⌫←4 2⌫ band discussed earlier.
1/2
gas pressures typical of these experiments, the B and C
states of KrF are closely coupled by collisions—hence, pre-
dissociation of the 6 2⌫ state of Kr2F would also quickly
produce the KrF(B) species.
C. Modeling of Kr2F fluorescence recovery: Estimate
of KrF yield
Figure 5 gives a comparison of the KrF(B) excitation
spectrum in the 550–900 nm region with the Kr2F͑4 2⌫͒ ab-
sorption spectrum measured by fluorescence suppression
over approximately the same wavelength interval. Although
the S/N ratio for the fluorescence suppression data is roughly
one half of that for the excitation spectrum, it is nevertheless
clear that the two spectra exhibit the same structure. Local
maxima at ϳ655 and 710 nm appear in both spectra and their
overall profiles are virtually indistinguishable. Recalling that
the excitation spectrum is a measure of the production of
In the discussion of Sec. III A, the partial recovery of the
Kr2F͑4 2⌫͒ fluorescence suppression wave forms following
the termination of the probe pulse was noted. One would
expect the rate and degree of recovery to depend critically on
several kinetic constants; in fact, the experimental wave
forms serve as a sensitive and convenient test of the rate
2
*
constant for the formation of Kr2F͑4 ⌫͒ from KrF by three
body collisions and, moreover, allow for a lower limit on the
*
yield of KrF in the photodissociation of Kr2F to be deter-
*
KrF as a function of wavelength, then normalizing the ex-
mined.
citation spectrum to the fluorescence suppression ͑absorp-
tion͒ spectrum provides a measure of the wavelength depen-
In order to assess the impact of various experimental
parameters and rate constants on the fluorescence suppres-
sion wave forms, a simple kinetics model of the KrF–Kr2F
system was constructed in which, for convenience, the pho-
todissociation of Kr2F ͑4 2⌫͒ was assumed to produce the
KrF (C) species. Photoexcitation of Kr2F can be described
by the following set of three coupled rate equations:
*
dence of the relative yield of KrF in the photodissociation
of Kr2F͑4 2⌫͒. Consequently, it is reasonable to conclude that
the KrF(B) yield is independent of wavelength in the 590–
840 nm region. The same result was obtained for the
9 2⌫←4 2⌫ spectra—the profiles for both the excitation and
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 106, No. 13, 1 April 1997
141.100.74.200 On: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 08:40:22