JOURNAL OF
POLYMER SCIENCE
ARTICLE
WWW.POLYMERCHEMISTRY.ORG
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was funded by NSFC (51203079), the Natural Sci-
ence Foundation of Tianjin (14JCYBJC18100), and PCSIRT
(IRT1257).
REFERENCES AND NOTES
1 P. Gallezot, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1538–1558.
2 R. A. Sheldon, Green Chem. 2014, 16, 950–963.
3 C. Vilela, A. F. Sousa, A. C. Fonseca, A. C. Serra, J. F. J.
Coelho, C. S. R. Freire, A. J. D. Silvestre, Polym. Chem. UK
2014, 5, 3119–3141.
4 G. Q. Chen, M. K. Patel, Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 2082–2099.
5 M. Vannini, P. Marchese, A. Celli, C. Lorenzetti, Green Chem.
2015, 17, 4162–4166.
6 S. K. Burgess, J. E. Leisen, B. E. Kraftschik, C. R. Mubarak, R.
M. Kriegel, W. J. Koros, Macromolecules 2014, 47, 1383–1391.
FIGURE 10 Compared 1HNMR spectra in CDCl3 of PDN1 (a, a00),
PDN170%E130% (b, b00), and PDN170%E230% (c, c00) after incuba-
tion at pH 7.4 with porcine pancreas lipase for 56 days and ini-
tial samples. The shadow areas indicate the signals arising
from respective terminal ACOOH and ACH2OH groups that
generated upon the hydrolysis of the main chain ester groups.
7 C. Lavilla, A. M. de Ilarduya, A. Alla, M. G. Garcia-Martin, J. A.
Galbis, S. Munoz-Guerra, Macromolecules 2012, 45, 8257–8266.
8 C. Japu, A. M. de Ilarduya, A. Alla, M. G. Garcia-Martin, J. A.
Galbis, S. Munoz-Guerra, Polym. Chem. UK 2014, 5, 3190–3202.
9 C. Lavilla, A. Alla, A. M. de Ilarduya, E. Benito, M. G. Garcia-
Martin, J. A. Galbis, S. Munoz-Guerra, Biomacromolecules
2011, 12, 2642–2652.
compared to the petroleum-based PDT and consequently
these bio-based poly(ether ester)s should be encouraged.
10 U. Biermann, U. Bornscheuer, M. A. R. Meier, J. O. Metzger,
H. J. Schafer, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2011, 50, 3854–3871.
11 C. Lavilla, S. Munoz-Guerra, Green Chem. 2013, 15, 144–151.
CONCLUSIONS
12 M. A. R. Meier, J. O. Metzger, U. S. Schubert, Chem. Soc.
Rev. 2007, 36, 1788–1802.
In an effort to prepare more sustainable and biodegradable
materials using naturally occurring biomass, renewable nipa-
gin and eugenol are used as the building blocks of poly(ether
ester) materials. The influence of insertion of phenoxy-ether
linkage in nipagin-based units and the eugenol-derived com-
position on thermal, crystalline, mechanical, and degradable
properties was emphatically investigated. The results from
TGA verify that the copoly(ether ester)s feature a compara-
ble thermal stability with the petroleum-based PDT even
though the content of eugenol-derived composition reaches
50%. DSC and WXRD data indicate that the insertion of
phenoxy-ether linkage and eugenol-based composition
impedes the crystallizability of PDN1 significantly. However,
the crystal form of PDT was partial maintained in the copo-
ly(ether ester)s. Young’s modulus and tensile strengths are
found to exhibit a decreasing tendency with the insertion of
phenoxy-ether linkage and eugenol-based composition, which
also prove to have significant influence on the toughening
effect observed. PDN1 exhibits enhanced toughness com-
pared to the petroleum-based PDT. When the content of
eugenol-based composition reaches up to 20%, namely,
PDN180%E120% and PDN280%E220%, the impact strength
increases up to 25.6 and 24.9 kJ/m2, respectively. Addition-
ally, the insertion of phenoxy-ether linkage and eugenol-
derived composition has significantly enhanced effect on the
hydrolytic and enzymatic degradability of such materials.
Finally, the renewable nipagin and eugenol will broaden the
thermoplastic spectrum and have practical applications in
the field of polymeric materials.
13 L. Maisonneuve, T. Lebarbe, E. Grau, H. Cramail, Polym.
Chem. UK 2013, 4, 5472–5517.
14 J. H. Zhu, J. L. Cai, W. C. Xie, P. H. Chen, M. Gazzano, M.
Scandola, R. A. Gross, Macromolecules 2013, 46, 796–804.
15 M. Colonna, C. Berti, M. Fiorini, E. Binassi, M. Mazzacurati,
M. Vannini, S. Karanam, Green Chem. 2011, 13, 2543–2548.
16 C. C. Pang, J. Zhang, Q. F. Zhang, G. L. Wu, Y. N. Wang, J.
B. Ma, Polym. Chem. UK 2015, 6, 797–804.
17 A. F. Sousa, C. Vilela, A. C. Fonseca, M. Matos, C. S. R.
Freire, G. J. M. Gruter, J. F. J. Coelho, A. J. D. Silvestre, Polym.
Chem. UK 2015, 6, 5961–5983.
18 S. Tomizawa, J. A. Chuah, K. Matsumoto, Y. Doi, K.
Numata, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1106–1113.
19 Y. Guo, K. Kannan, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 14442–14449.
20 N. Cabaleiro, I. de la Calle, C. Bendicho, I. Lavilla, TrAC
Trend Anal. Chem. 2014, 57, 34–46.
21 J. Y. Lee, J. S. Jang, Polymer 2006, 47, 3036–3042.
22 Y. Q. Tian, E. Akiyama, Y. Nagase, J. Mater. Chem. 2003, 13,
1253–1258.
23 J. A. M. Lummiss, K. C. Oliveira, A. M. T. Pranckevicius, A.
G. Santos, E. N. dos Santos, D. E. Fogg, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2012, 134, 18889–18891.
24 L. Dumas, L. Bonnaud, M. Olivier, M. Poorteman, P. Dubois,
J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 6012–6018.
25 C. Li, J. T. Wan, E. N. Kalali, H. Fan, D. Y. Wang, J. Mater.
Chem. A 2015, 3, 3471–3479.
26 J. T. Wan, B. Gan, C. Li, J. Molina-Aldareguia, Z. Li, X.
Wang, D. Y. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 21907–21921.
27 B. R. Donovan, J. S. Cobb, E. F. T. Hoff, D. L. Patton, RSC
Adv. 2014, 4, 61927–61935.
2182
JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE, PART A: POLYMER CHEMISTRY 2016, 54, 2171–2183