ACS Combinatorial Science
Research Article
vacuum concentrator were used to speed up the synthesis of
this library, and the rapid purification of its members was
accomplished using solid-phase extraction. The conditions
developed in this work are anticipated to enable the generation
of even more structurally diverse, uridine moiety-containing
libraries in the future. A preliminary bacterial morphology
study showed that subtle structural differences of uridine
compounds lead different morphology and shape; a more
extensive bioevaluation of this library (forward chemical
genetic screen) is underway, and the results will be published
in due course.
General Procedure of Model Molecules 11S{1−2} and
11R{1−2}. To a solution of alkyne 5S or 5R (1 equiv) and 3-
azidopropan-1-amine (1.5 equiv) in tert-butanol was succes-
sively added CuSO (0.1 equiv) and sodium ascorbate (0.3
4
equiv). The mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 3 h and diluted
with EtOAc and water. The aqueous phase was extracted with
EA, and the combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4,
filtered, and concentrated to get amine. A solution of amine(1
equiv) in DCM was added with acid(1.5 equiv), EDC·HCl
(
1.5 equiv) and triethylamine (3 equiv). After 4 h, the reaction
was quenched and the organic layer was extracted with 1 N
HCl. The combined organic layers were dried over MgSO4,
filtered and concentrated in vacuum. The residue was purified
by column chromatography (EtOAc) to get the corresponding
product.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
■
General Information and Instrumentation. All chem-
icals were obtained from commercial suppliers and used
without further purification. Flash column chromatography
was performed on silica gel of 40−63 μm particle size. NMR
Compound 11S{1}. Yield: 95% over 2 steps. R = 0.2 (EA).
H NMR (600 MHz, MeOD) δ 7.91 (s, 1H), 7.60 (d, 1H, J =
f
1
spectra were recorded on dilute solutions in D O, CDCl and
2
3
8.0 Hz), 5.70 (br, 1H), 5.66 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 5.17 (d, 1H, J
MeOD on Bruker AVANCE 600 spectrometers at ambient
temperature. High-resolution ESI mass spectra were recorded
on a Bruker Daltonics spectrometer. Parallel synthesis was
performed on Mini-Block synthesizer and the reaction vessel
=
5.0 Hz), 5.11 (d, 1H, J = 5.0 Hz), 4.41 (t, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz),
4
.36 (br, 1H), 3.19 (t, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.18 (t, 2H, J = 7.5
Hz), 2.11−2.05 (m, 2H), 1.73−1.63 (m, 5H), 1.60−1.55 (m,
2
1
H), 1.52 (s, 3H), 1.42 (s, 9H), 1.35−1.30 (m, 5H), 1.25−
.15 (m, 6H), 0.92−0.85 (m, 2H). C NMR (150 MHz,
(
115 × 12) mm. Multiple-functional liquid handler (Freedom
13
EVO, TECAN) was utilized for extraction and separation.
Solvent evaporation was performed on Thermo Scientific Savat
Explorer SpeedVac Concentrator Explorer-220.
MeOD) δ 176.7, 166.4, 157.9, 152.3, 147.5, 145.4, 124.7,
1
3
2
6
15.7, 103.0, 95.6, 89.1, 85.2, 82.5, 80.7, 50.4, 49.7, 39.0, 38.5,
7.5, 37.3, 34.7 (× 2), 31.3, 28.9 (×3), 27.9, 27.7, 26.6 (×3),
6.4, 25.7. HRMS calculated for [C H N O + H]
Preparation of the Key Intermediate 5S. A mixture of
+
3
3
51
7
8
4
S (144 mg, 0.356 mmol) and NaN in DMF (0.2 mL, 0.21
3
74.3872, found 674.3895.
mmol) was stirred at 70 °C for 1.0 h. The reaction residue was
extracted with EtOAc. The organic layers were dried over
Compound 11S{2}. Yield: 97% over 2 steps. R = 0.5 (EA).
f
1
H NMR (600 MHz, MeOD) δ 7.91 (s, 1H), 7.60 (d, 1H, J =
MgSO and concentrated. The reaction mixture was purified
4
8
.0 Hz), 5.70 (br, 1H), 5.66 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 5.17 (br, 1H),
.11 (d, 1H, J = 4.8 Hz), 4.41 (t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz), 4.36 (br,
H), 3.19 (t, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz), 2.18 (t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 2.11−
.05 (m, 2H), 1.62−1.57 (m, 2H), 1.52 (s, 3H), 1.42 (s, 9H),
by column chromatography EtOAc/hexane = 1/1) to give 5S
5
1
2
1
(
110 mg, 0.246 mmol, 69%). R = 0.3 (EtOAc/hexane = 1/1).
f
1
H NMR (600 MHz, CD OD) δ 9.78 (brs, 1H), 7.49 (d, 1H, J
3
=
4
4
8.1 Hz), 5.90 (d, 1H, J = 3.3 Hz), 5.76 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz),
.82 (dd, 1H, J = 6.4, 3.2 Hz), 4.76 (dd, 1H, J = 6.4, 3.2 Hz),
.50 (d, 1H, J = 5.2 Hz), 4.23 (dd, 1H, J = 5.1, 3.2 Hz), 1.57
13
.34−1.26 (m, 25H), 0.92−0.87 (m, 2H). C NMR (150
MHz, MeOD) δ 176.7, 166.4, 157.9, 152.3, 147.5, 145.4,
124.7, 115.7, 103.0, 95.6, 89.1, 85.2, 82.5, 80.7, 50.4, 49.7, 37.5,
37.3, 33.2, 31.3, 30.9 (× 5), 30.8, 30.6 (× 2), 30.5, 28.9 (× 3),
27.6, 27.2, 25.7, 23.9, 14.6. HRMS calculated for [C H N O
+
(
s, 3H) 1.33 (s, 3H), 0.98 (t, 9H, J = 7.9 Hz), 0.62 (m, 6H, J =
1
3
7
1
7
4
.9 Hz). C NMR (150 MHz, CD OD) δ 163.4, 150.1, 140.9,
3
3
7
61
7
8
14.8, 102.9, 97.3, 92.9, 92.3, 86.2, 83.7, 80.9, 54.6, 27.0, 25.1,
+
H] 732.4654, found 732.4677.
+
.2 (×3), 4.0 (×3). HRMS calcd for [C H NO Si+H]
20
29
5
Compound 11R{1}. Yield: 91% over 2 steps. R = 0.2 (EA).
f
48.2011, found 448.2013.
1
H NMR (600 MHz, MeOD) δ 7.89 (s, 1H), 7.52 (d, 1H, J =
Preparation of the Key Intermediate 5R. A mixture of
S (23.0 mg, 0.07 mmol) and 1 M trimethylphosphine in THF
7
.9 Hz), 5.74 (br, 1H), 5.64 (d, 1H, 7.9 Hz), 5.16 (d, 1H, 6.7
3
Hz), 5.02 (br, 1H), 4.96 (br, 1H), 4.40 (t, 2H J = 6.8 Hz), 4.32
(
0.2 mL, 0.21 mmol) was added in THF/H O (1/1) and
2
(
br, 1H), 3.18 (t, 2H J = 6.5 Hz), 2.18 (t, 2H, J = 7.4 Hz),
stirred for 5 h. The reaction mixture was added di-tert-butyl
dicarbonate (0.03 mL, 0.14 mmol) and sodium bicarbonate
2
1
6
1
9
3
.10−2.04 (m, 2H), 1.75−1.63 (m, 5H), 1.60−1.51 (m, 2H),
.53 (s, 3H), 1.45 (s, 9H), 1.35−1.30 (m, 5H), 1.26−1.14 (m,
(
11.6 mg, 0.14 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for 2
1
3
H), 0.92−0.84 (m, 2H). C NMR (150 MHz, MeOD) δ
76.7, 166.3, 157.8, 152.0, 147.2, 144.7, 124.7, 115.8, 103.0,
4.8, 88.9, 85.2, 82.9, 80.9, 50.2 (×2), 39.0, 38.5, 37.5, 37.3,
h. The reaction residue was extracted with EtOAc. The organic
layers were dried over MgSO and concentrated. The reaction
4
mixture was added TBAF (1.0 M in THF, 2.4 mL, 2.40 mmol)
and stirred for 0.5 h, then concentrated, purified by column
chromatography (EtOAc/hexane = 2/1) to give 5R (13.5 mg,
4.7 (×2), 31.3, 28.8 (×3), 28.0, 27.7, 27.6 (×3), 27.4, 25.7.
+
HRMS calculated for [C H N O + H] 674.3872, found
33 51
7
8
674.3909.
0
1
1
.044 mmol, 63% over 3 steps). R = 0.7 (EtOAc/hexane = 2/
f
1
Compound 11R{2}. Yield: 73% over 2 steps. R = 0.5 (EA).
). H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d ) δ 11.4 (brs, 1H), 7.67 (d,
f
6
1
H NMR (600 MHz, MeOD) δ 7.91 (s, 1H), 7.60 (d, 1H, J =
8.0 Hz), 5.70 (br, 1H), 5.66 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 5.17 (br, 1H),
5.11 (d, 1H, J = 4.8 Hz), 4.41 (t, 2H, J = 6.9 Hz), 4.36 (br,
1H), 3.19 (t, 2H, J = 6.6 Hz), 2.18 (t, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 2.11−
2.05 (m, 2H), 1.62−1.57 (m, 2H), 1.52 (s, 3H), 1.42 (s, 9H),
H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.30 (d, 1H, J = 9.1 Hz), 5.73 (d, 1H, J = 1.4
Hz), 5.57 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 5.15 (d, 1H, J = 6.1 Hz), 4.87
(
(
dd, 1H, J = 6.3, 3.0 Hz), 4.58 (m, 1H, J = 9.1, 7.7 Hz), 4.02
dd, 1H, J = 9.1, 3.0 Hz), 3.30 (s, 3H), 1.46 (s, 3H), 1.32 (s, 9
1
3
H), 1.29 (s, 3H). C NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d ) δ 163.2,
6
1
3
1
7
55.0, 150.2, 142.8, 113.2, 101.8, 92.5, 86.7, 83.2, 81.6, 81.4,
1.34−1.26 (m, 25H), 0.92−0.87 (m, 2H). C NMR (150
MHz, MeOD) δ 176.7, 166.4, 157.9, 152.3, 147.5, 145.4,
124.7, 115.7, 103.0, 95.6, 89.1, 85.2, 82.5, 80.7, 50.4, 49.7, 37.5,
8.7, 74.5, 43.9, 28.1 (×3), 26.8, 25.0. HRMS calculated for
+
[C H N O + H] 430.1585, found 430.1565.
19
25
3
7
F
ACS Comb. Sci. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX