Next, the generation of 6- and 7-membered ring carbocycles
was attempted by applying the same conditions to ketoesters 5
and 6. In the case of 5, the desired cyclization product ethyl
of 5-, 6-, and 7-membered carbocycles bearing functionalised
quaternary carbon centres starting from easily available
unsaturated carbonyl compounds. The generation of the alde-
hyde from its olefin precursor allows for the initial enolboration
of the preexisting carbonyl group to proceed selectively, which
circumvents the more laborious construction of protected alde-
hyde substrates necessary to accomplish this transformation
via intramolecular Lewis acid-mediated acetal cyclisation tech-
niques.16 Notably, the boron enolate tolerates the hydroformyl-
ation conditions and reacts immediately with the aldehyde
group, thus preventing unwanted side reactions.
6-hydroxy-1,3,3-trimethyl-2-oxo-cyclohexanecarboxylate
(9)
was obtained in 82% isolated yield as a 2.5 : 1 mixture of
diastereoisomers. This product is potentially useful as a stereo-
defined building block, offering direct access to the A-ring
system of forskolin (1) in one step.
Another encouraging result was obtained when ketoester 6
was subjected to the same conditions, resulting in the formation
of the 7-membered ring of methyl 2-hydroxy-1-methyl-7-oxo-
cycloheptane-carboxylate (10) as the sole product in 89% yield
as a 6 : 1 mixture of diastereoisomers (Scheme 3). The suitability
of this method to form functionalized β-hydroxycyclo-
heptanones bearing α-quaternary centres in high yields and
good diastereoselectivities is particularly attractive, since stereo-
selective methods leading to substituted 7-membered rings—
such as the central B-ring of ingenol (2)15—are much less
commonplace.
Acknowledgements
Many thanks for performing the NOE studies go to
Dr. Burkhard Costisella of the Universität Dortmund. We
thank Bayer AG, Leverkusen and Degussa AG, Düsseldorf
for donation of chemicals, and the Deutsche Forschungs-
gemeinschaft for financial support.
Notes and references
‡ Procedure for sequential enolboration/hydroformylation/aldol addition
reactions. Et3N (1.05 eq. to carbonyl compound) was pre-complexed
under an argon atmosphere with (cy-hex)2BCl (1.05 eq.) in dry CH2Cl2
(5 mL) at 0 ЊC for 15 min. The unsaturated carbonyl compound in
approx. 1 mL of solvent was then added slowly via syringe and the
enolboration was allowed to stir for an additional 30 min before being
transferred into the autoclave containing 0.9 mol% Rh(CO)2(acac),
10–15 mL of solvent and 1.8 mol% XANTPHOS. The autoclave was
then pressurised to 60 bar with equal pressures of CO and H2 CAU-
TION! and heated overnight to 80 ЊC. Upon cooling the autoclave to
RT, the reaction mixture was removed and concentrated under reduced
pressure. Enough MeOH was added to dissolve the solid residue (∼25
mL) along with 2 mL of conc. pH 7 phosphate buffer and 1 mL of 30%
H2O2, and the reaction was allowed to stir overnight before being
extracted with ether (100 mL), washed with sat. aq. NaHCO3 (1 × 75
mL), dried and concentrated prior to further purification when neces-
sary via flash chromatography or Kugelrohr distillation.
Scheme 3 Conditions 1.05 eq (cy-hex)2BCl, 1.05 eq. Et3N, 0 ЊC, 0.9
mol% Rh(CO)2(acac), 1.8 mol% XANTPHOS, 16 h, 60 bar CO/H2,
80 ЊC.
The relative configuration of the two stereogenic centres of
compounds 9 and 10 was established by 1D gradient NOE
experiments. A summary of the characteristic NOE inter-
actions observed are shown for 10—the compound obtained in
the highest diastereoselectivity—in Fig. 1.
1 Some recent examples of the diastereoselective construction of qua-
ternary carbon centres: E. D. Burke and J. L. Gleason, Org. Lett.,
2004, 6, 405; J. W. J. Kennedy and D. G. Hall, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2002, 124, 898; L. Barriault and I. Denissova, Org. Lett., 2002, 4,
1371; R. K. Boeckman Jr., D. J. Boehmler and R. A. Musselman,
Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 3777; P. A. Evans and L. J. Kennedy, Org. Lett.,
2000, 2, 2213.
2 S. E. Denmark and J. Fu, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 1951; A. B. Dounay,
K. Hatanaka, J. J. Kodanko, M. Oestreich, L. E. Overman,
L. A. Pfeifer and M. M. Weiss, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 6261.
Reviews: J. Christoffers and A. Mann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001,
40, 4591; E. J. Corey and A. Guzman-Perez, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
1998, 37, 388; K. Fuji, Chem. Rev., 1993, 93, 2037.
3 Tandem C–C bond formation/hydroformylation: L. Bärfacker,
C. Buss, C. Hollmann, B. E. Kitsos-Rzychon, C. L. Kranemann,
T. Rische, R. Roggenbuck, A. Schmidt and P. Eilbracht, Chem. Rev.,
1999, 99, 3329; B. Breit, Acc. Chem. Res., 2003, 36, 264;
M. J. Zacuto, S. J. OЈMalley and J. L. Leighton, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2002, 124, 7894.
Fig. 1 Characteristic NOE interactions present in 10.
The aldol addition in the latter cases proceeds with a con-
siderably higher degree of diastereoselectivity when compared
to the conversion of 4. A potential transition state assembly
that accounts for this can be seen in Scheme 4. The enolate
geometry here again is determined by chelation during the
enolboration prior to hydroformylation. After hydroformyl-
ation, chelation switches from the ester group to the aldehyde,
resulting in a rigid bicyclic transition state for the aldol
addition.
4 C. Hollmann and P. Eilbracht, Tetrahedron Lett., 1999, 40, 4313;
C. Hollmann and P. Eilbracht, Tetrahedron, 2000, 56, 1685.
5 C. J. Crowden and I. Paterson, Org. React., 1997, 51, 1.
6 B. Denis, Synth. Commun., 1986, 16, 291.
7 S. C. Welch, J. M. Assercq, J. P. Loh and S. A. Glase, J. Org. Chem.,
1987, 52, 1440.
8 S. N. Huckin and L. Weiler, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1974, 96, 1082;
G. Stork, J. D. Winkler and N. A. Saccomano, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1983, 24, 465.
9 L. Weiler, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1970, 92, 6702.
10 A. Lee and L. Lin, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 8803.
11 H. C. Brown, R. K. Dhar, R. K. Bakshi, P. K. Pandiarajan and
B. Singaram, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 3441; H. C. Brown
and K. Ganesan, J. Org. Chem., 1993, 58, 7162; H. C. Brown,
K. Ganesan and R. K. Dhar, J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 3767.
12 L. A. van der Veen, P. H. Keeven, G. C. Schoemaker, J. N. H. Reek,
P. C. J. Kamer, P. W. N. M. van Leeuwen, M. Lutz and A. L. Spek,
Organometallics, 2000, 19, 872 and references within.
Scheme 4 Transition state responsible for the diastereoselectivity
observed in 6- and 7-membered ring formation.
In summary, we herein report a new one-pot enolboration/
hydroformylation/aldol addition cascade reaction, and demon-
strate its utility in the regio- and diastereoselective synthesis
O r g . B i o m o l . C h e m . , 2 0 0 4 , 2, 1 6 8 8 – 1 6 9 0
1689