RESEARCH
| REPORTS
magnetosphere can attain when the IMF points
northward.
BIOPHYSICS
REFERENCES AND NOTES
Extreme electric fields power
catalysis in the active site of
1.
J. W. Dungey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 47–48 (1961).
2.
J. W. Dungey, in Geophysics: The Earth’s Environment,
C. DeWitt, J. Hieblot, A. Lebeau, Eds. (Gordon and Breach,
New York, 1963), pp. 505–550.
3.
J. D. Menietti, J. L. Burch, J. Geophys. Res. 92, 7503–7518 (1987).
4.
Q. Q. Shi et al., Nat. Commun. 4, 1466 (2013).
ketosteroid isomerase
5.
C. Y. Huang et al., J. Geophys. Res. 92, 2349–2363 (1987).
6. C. Y. Huang, J. D. Craven, L. A. Frank, J. Geophys. Res. 94,
10137–10143 (1989).
Stephen D. Fried,* Sayan Bagchi,† Steven G. Boxer‡
7.
L. A. Frank, J. D. Craven, J. L. Burch, J. D. Winningham,
Geophys. Res. Lett. 9, 1001–1004 (1982).
Enzymes use protein architecture to impose specific electrostatic fields onto their bound
substrates, but the magnitude and catalytic effect of these electric fields have proven
difficult to quantify with standard experimental approaches. Using vibrational Stark
effect spectroscopy, we found that the active site of the enzyme ketosteroid isomerase
8.
L. A. Frank et al., J. Geophys. Res. 91, 3177–3224 (1986).
9. W. K. Peterson, E. G. Shelley, J. Geophys. Res. 89, 6729–6736 (1984).
1
1
0. S. E. Milan, B. Hubert, A. Grocott, J. Geophys. Res. 110, A01212 (2005).
1. D. A. Hardy, W. J. Burke, M. S. Gussenhoven, J. Geophys. Res.
8
7, 2413–2430 (1982).
2. M. S. Gussenhoven, E. G. Mullen, J. Geophys. Res. 94,
7121–17132 (1989).
(KSI) exerts an extremely large electric field onto the C=O chemical bond that undergoes
1
1
a charge rearrangement in KSI’s rate-determining step. Moreover, we found that the
magnitude of the electric field exerted by the active site strongly correlates with the
enzyme’s catalytic rate enhancement, enabling us to quantify the fraction of the catalytic
effect that is electrostatic in origin. The measurements described here may help explain
the role of electrostatics in many other enzymes and biomolecular systems.
1
3. N. Østgaard, S. B. Mende, H. U. Frey, L. A. Frank,
J. B. Sigwarth, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2125 (2003).
14. R. C. Fear, S. E. Milan, J. Geophys. Res. 117, A03213 (2012).
15. A. Kullen, M. Brittnacher, J. A. Cumnock, L. G. Blomberg,
J. Geophys. Res. 107, 1362 (2002).
1
1
6. N. Østgaard et al., J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 69, 249–255 (2007).
7. A. Goudarzi, M. Lester, S. E. Milan, H. U. Frey, Ann. Geophys.
etosteroid isomerase (KSI) is a small, pro-
ficient enzyme with one of the highest
known unimolecular rate constants in
biochemistry (1, 2), which has prompted
extensive study of its mechanism and the
cycle (10). In this study, we have focused on the
C=O group of the inhibitor 19-nortestosterone
(19-NT) (Fig. 1C), because when 19-NT binds, the
C=O group is loaded directly into the catalytic
machinery (11, 12). In this way, 19-NT’s C=O vibra-
tional (infrared) frequency shift probes the electro-
static environment that the substrate’s C=O bond
would experience in the active site, except 19-NT
cannot react due to the position of the C=C bond.
To calibrate the sensitivity of 19-NT’s C=O vi-
brational frequency to an electric field, we used
two complementary approaches. In Stark spec-
troscopy (Fig. 2, A and B), an external electric
field of known magnitude is applied to a frozen
glass containing 19-NT, and the accompanying
effect on the vibrational spectrum is recorded (7).
By fitting the Stark spectrum (Fig. 2B) to deriv-
atives of the absorption spectrum (Fig. 2A), the
vibration’s difference dipole can be extracted:
2
6, 201–210 (2008).
1
1
8. J. A. Cumnock et al., J. Geophys. Res. 116, A02218 (2011).
9. A. Kullen, in Auroral Phenomenology and Magnetospheric
Processes: Earth and Other Planets, A. Keiling, E. Donovan,
F. Bagenal, T. Karlsson, Eds. (Geophysical Monograph 197,
American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 2012), pp. 69–80.
K
catalytic strategies it uses (3–5). In steroid biosyn-
thesis and degradation, KSI alters the position of a
C=C double bond (Fig. 1A) by first abstracting a
nearby a proton (E•S ⇌ E•I), forming a charged
enolate intermediate (E•I), and then reinserting
the proton onto the steroid two carbons away
(E•I ⇌ E•P). The removal of a proton in the first
step initiates a rehybridization that converts the
adjacent ketone group to a charged enolate, an
unstable species that is normally high in free en-
ergy and so slow to form. The reaction is therefore
2
0. R. C. Fear, S. E. Milan, J. Geophys. Res. 117, A09230 (2012).
2
2
2
1. A. P. Walsh et al., J. Geophys. Res. 118, 6042–6054 (2013).
2. S. B. Mende et al., Space Sci. Rev. 91, 271–285 (2000).
3. N. A. Tsyganenko, in Proceedings of the Third International
Conference on Substorms (ICS-3), Versailles, France, 12 to 17
May 1996 (SP 389, European Space Agency, Noordwijk,
Netherlands, 1996), pp. 181–185.
4. C. T. Russell, Cosmic Electrodyn. 2, 184–196 (1971).
5. J. H. King, N. E. Papitashvili, J. Geophys. Res. 110, A02104 (2005).
6. A. N. Fazakerley et al., in The Cluster Active Archive - Studying the
Earth’s Space Plasma Environment, H. Laakso, M. Taylor, P. Escoubet,
Eds. (Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2010), pp. 129–144.
7. H. Rème et al., Ann. Geophys. 19, 1303–1354 (2001).
2
2
2
2
expected to produce an increase in dipole moment
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
→
at the carbonyl bond (jDm j), suggesting that KSI
rxn
Work in the UK was supported by Science and Technology
Facilities Council (STFC) Ernest Rutherford Fellowship
ST/K004298/1 and STFC grants ST/K001000/1 and
may facilitate this reaction by exerting an electric
→
→
–1
field (F enz) on this bond that stabilizes it in the
intermediate form and the preceding transition
state (Fig. 1B). Using vibrational Stark effects, we
have measured the electric field that KSI exerts on
this C=O bond, providing quantitative experimen-
tal evidence for the connection between electro-
statics and catalytic proficiency.
The frequencies of certain vibrations (such as
the C=O stretch) shift in a linear manner with
the electric field experienced by that vibration
from its environment, a phenomenon known as
the linear vibrational Stark effect (6, 7). Through
this effect, we have shown that vibrations can be
used as probes of local electrostatic fields. The
nitrile group has been widely deployed to mea-
sure electric fields inside enzymes and their re-
lationship to mutation (8), ligand occupancy (9),
or conformational changes over the catalytic
jDm
jƒ = 1.39 T 0.05 cm /(MV/cm), where ƒ is
C¼O
ST/K000977/1. R.M. is supported by the Belgian Science Policy
Office through the Solar-Terrestrial Center of Excellence. French
participation in the Cluster project is funded by the Centre National
d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES). IMAGE satellite work at the University
of California, Berkeley, was supported through a Southwest
Research Institute subcontract under NASA contract NAS5-96020.
We acknowledge support from the International Space Science
Institute through funding of its International Team on Polar Cap
Arcs, and we are grateful for discussions with members of the
team. Cluster data were obtained from the Cluster Active Archive
the local field factor (fig. S1) (6, 7, 13). A vibra-
tion’s difference dipole is its linear Stark tuning
rate; that is, 19-NT’s C=O vibrational frequency
–1
shifts ~1.4/ƒ cm for every MV/cm of electric
field projected onto the C=O bond axis, whether
the source of that field is an external voltage (as
in Stark spectroscopy) or an organized environ-
→
ment created by an enzyme active site (F enz) that
we wish to characterize. Whenever an external
field is applied to a vitreous sample, vibrational
bands will broaden because 19-NT molecules
(and their C=O bonds) are randomly oriented
with respect to the fixed direction of the external
electric field (6, 7). By contrast, a vibrational probe
will have a fixed orientation with respect to a
protein electric field when bound to a protein, and
as such the linear Stark effect then produces spec-
tral shifts instead of broadening. The C=O vibra-
tion’s Stark tuning rate does not appreciably change
when C=O accepts a hydrogen bond (fig. S2), im-
plying that the frequency still responds to fields
linearly even when C=O participates in stronger
interactions, although those interactions themselves
are associated with larger electric fields (14).
(
http://caa.estec.esa.int/caa/), and the IMAGE FUV data were
provided by the NASA Space Science Data Center (http://nssdc.
gsfc.nasa.gov/space/). The OMNI IMF data were obtained through
NASA’s CDAWeb (http://cdaweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/), for which we
acknowledge J. H. King, N. Papatashvilli, and the principal
investigators of the magnetic field and plasma instruments on the
Geotail and Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) spacecraft. The
DMSP particle detectors were designed by D. Hardy of Air Force
Research Laboratory, and data were obtained from the Johns
Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
www.sciencemag.org/content/346/6216/1506/suppl/DC1
Supplementary Text
Fig. S1
References (28–38)
Movie S1
Department of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
4305-1052, USA.
Present address: Protein and Nucleic Acid Chemistry Division,
Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge
CB2 0QH, UK. †Present address: Physical and Materials Chemistry
Division, National Chemical Laboratory (CSIR), Pune 411008, India.
‡Corresponding author. E-mail: sboxer@stanford.edu
9
*
1
1
2 June 2014; accepted 19 November 2014
0.1126/science.1257377
1
510 19 DECEMBER 2014 • VOL 346 ISSUE 6216
sciencemag.org SCIENCE