Communication
ChemComm
five orders of magnitude. The spectroscopic and computational
analyses indicate that visible light photoexcitation can effec-
tively dissociate the Pd–Pd bond of 1. The resulting 5C Pd2III
species is more RE-active than the ground-state 6C PdI2II species,
because of a weaker ligand field and thus a reduced ICT energy
cost. This finding on the correlation between the ligand field
and the RE activity establishes the ICT energy cost as a funda-
mental descriptor for RE reactions, which can be useful for
understanding perturbations in RE activity and designing new
catalysts with optimized RE activities.
This work was financially supported by Samsung Science
and Technology Foundation (SSTF-BA1801-05). We thank
Center for Catalytic Hydrocarbon Functionalizations, IBS for
computational and rR spectroscopic resources.
Fig. 5 Variations in the ICT energy depending on ligand field.
crossover from the S0 reactant to the T1 transition state with
DG‡ = 19.9 kcal molÀ1 (Fig. S22, ESI†).
Conflicts of interest
The increased RE activity of the excited-state 5C PdI2II species
relative to the ground-state 6C PdI2II species demonstrates the
effect of ligand field on the RE activity. The reaction coordi-
nates show that upon conversion from reactant (R) to transition
state (TS), electrons are transferred from the Cl-based
s-bonding MO to the Pd-based lowest-unoccupied s*-
antibonding MO (#134 - #148 for S0 and #135 - #147 for
T1 in Fig. 4b). The energy separations between these frontier
MOs are 4.11 and 3.52 eV for the 6C and 5C species, respec-
tively, indicating that the internal charge transfer (ICT) process
would require B13.6 kcal molÀ1 more energy for the 6C
species than the 5C species (Fig. 5). This ICT energy difference
parallels the intrinsic barrier differences of the two species
(DDG‡int B 6.6 kcal molÀ1), considering that geometric relaxa-
tion would occur. The lower ICT energy cost of the 5C species
originates from the lower-energy Pd dz2-based unoccupied MO,
which is significantly stabilized upon Pd–Pd bond dissociation
(Fig. 5).
This correlation found between the RE activity and the
ligand field suggests the ICT energy as a fundamental descrip-
tor of RE reactions. A previous study on the C–C coupling
activity of PtIV complexes showed that the 5C PtIV species are
more kinetically competent for the RE reaction than the 6C PtIV
species (Fig. S23, ESI†).12 This ligand-field effect on the C–C
coupling activity can also be understood by a variation in the
ICT energy, being parallel to the ground- vs. excited-state Pd2III
RE activities (Fig. S16, ESI†). The same principle can also be
applied to the lower RE activity of the mononuclear (phpy)2
PdIV(Cl)(OAc) species, 40% formation of 2 in 24 hours at
80 1C.13 Compared to 1, the PdIV monomer contains a stronger
ligand field with an additional C ligand and more covalent
Pd–C bonds. Thus, the energy separation between the ICT-
There are no conflicts to declare.
Notes and references
1 (a) I. G. Powers and C. Uyeda, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 936–958;
(b) H. M. L. Davies and K. B. Liao, Nat. Rev. Chem., 2019, 3,
347–360; (c) J. F. Berry and C. C. Lu, Inorg. Chem., 2017, 56,
7577–7581; (d) H. T. Chifotides and K. R. Dunbar, Acc. Chem. Res.,
2005, 38, 146–156; (e) K. Matsumoto and M. Ochiai, Coord. Chem.
Rev., 2002, 231, 229–238.
2 (a) D. M. Roundhill, H. B. Gray and C. M. Che, Acc. Chem. Res., 1989,
22, 55–61; (b) J. E. Bercaw, A. C. Durrell, H. B. Gray, J. C. Green,
N. Hazari, J. A. Labinger and J. R. Winkler, Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49,
1801–1810; (c) R. M. van der Veen, C. J. Milne, A. El Nahhas,
F. A. Lima, V. T. Pham, J. Best, J. A. Weinstein, C. N. Borca,
R. Abela, C. Bressler and M. Chergui, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009,
48, 2711–2714.
3 (a) C. M. Che, L. G. Butler, H. B. Gray, R. M. Crooks and
W. H. Woodruff, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 5492–5494;
(b) D. J. Thiel, P. Livins, E. A. Stern and A. Lewis, Nature, 1993,
362, 40–43.
4 D. C. Powers and T. Ritter, Acc. Chem. Res., 2012, 45, 840–850.
5 (a) D. C. Powers and T. Ritter, Organometallics, 2013, 32, 2042–2045;
(b) D. C. Powers and T. Ritter, Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 302–309.
6 J. Shin, S. Gwon, S. Kim, J. Lee and K. Park, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020,
142, 4173–4183.
7 (a) A. E. Stiegman, V. M. Miskowski and H. B. Gray, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1986, 108, 2781–2782; (b) M. A. Bennett, S. K. Bhargava,
E. C.-C. Cheng, W. H. Lam, T. K.-M. Lee, S. H. Priver, J. Wagler,
A. C. Willis and V. W.-W. Yam, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132,
7094–7103; (c) A. E. Stiegman and V. M. Miskowski, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1988, 110, 4053–4054.
8 C. M. Che, W. P. Schaefer, H. B. Gray, M. K. Dickson, P. B. Stein and
D. M. Roundhill, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104, 4253–4255.
9 S. H. Lai, J. W. Ling, Y. M. Huang, M. J. Huang, C. H. Cheng and
I. C. Chen, J. Raman Spectrosc., 2011, 42, 332–338.
10 (a) M. G. Colombo, T. C. Brunold, T. Riedener, H. U. Gudel,
M. Fortsch and H. B. Burgi, Inorg. Chem., 1994, 33, 545–550;
(b) M. Maestri, D. Sandrini, V. Balzani, A. Vonzelewsky,
C. Deuschelcornioley and P. Jolliet, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1988, 71,
1053–1059; (c) M. A. Ivanov and M. V. Puzyk, Opt. Spectrosc., 2001,
91, 869–872.
relevant FMOs of the PdIV complex is calculated to be 1.21 eV 11 P. M. Bradley, B. E. Bursten and C. Turro, Inorg. Chem., 2001, 40,
greater than that of the Pd2 6C species (Fig. 5 and Fig. S16,
1376–1379.
12 (a) J. Procelewska, A. Zahl, G. Liehr, R. van Eldik, N. A. Smythe,
ESI†). Accordingly, the RE reaction barrier is calculated to be
B. S. Williams and K. I. Goldberg, Inorg. Chem., 2005, 44, 7732–7742;
(b) A. T. Luedtke and K. I. Goldberg, Inorg. Chem., 2007, 46,
8496–8498.
higher for the mononuclear system (DG‡ = 28.1 kcal molÀ1 for
the 6C PdIV monomer vs. 22.5 for the 6C PdI2II dimer).
13 S. R. Whitfield, New Oxidation Reactions of Palladium and Platinum:
Synthetic and Mechanistic Investigations., University of Michigan,
2008.
In conclusion, we have observed that electronic excitation
can accelerate the C–Cl bond-forming RE reaction of 1 by up to
7676 | Chem. Commun., 2021, 57, 7673–7676
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021