Communication
ChemComm
be estimated by simple spontaneous emission relationship that of the acicular crystal, which matches well with the phenom-
E B fDE2vert, where f is the dimensionless oscillator strength enon of the highly emissive property of the block shape crystal.
and DEvert is the energy difference in units of cmÀ1 between the This work uncovered the structural and functional diversity of
S1 and S0 states at the optimized S1 geometry. As shown in boron-containing molecules, while providing a new strategy for
Table S8 (ESI†), f and DEvert for the block and acicular crystal designing novel functional materials.
are similar to each other. Therefore, the kr values of the block
This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foun-
and acicular crystals are similar to each other. The reorganiza- dation of China (21772012, 21803007), and Beijing Institute of
tion energy from S0 to S1 and vice versa can be obtained by the Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholar. The
adiabatic potential (AP) energy surface method. We find that authors acknowledge the Analysis and Testing Center of Beijing
the total reorganization energy of the block crystal (430 meV) is Institute of Technology for characterizations. G. M. L. also thanks
smaller than that of the acicular crystal (450 meV), see Table S9 the Project of the Science Funds of Jiangxi Education Office
(ESI†). As known from previous work, the decrease of the (GJJ180629) and the Project of Jiangxi Science and Technology
reorganization energy can sharply retard the electron–vibration Normal University (2016XJZD009) for financial support.
coupling caused nonradiative decay rate constant;23–27 thus, kic
of the block crystal is smaller than that of the acicular phase.
Therefore, the block crystal has a higher fluorescence quantum
yield than the acicular crystal. Besides, the photo-luminescent
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts to declare.
properties of Mes*B-TCN in the block crystal, neat film and
CH2Cl2 solution were also studied, and all these samples are
weakly emissive, indicating that Mes*B-TCN exhibits no CIEE
behavior (see Fig. S6 and Table S5, ESI†).
Notes and references
1 X. Cai and B. Liu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 9868–9886.
2 Z. Guo, C. Yan and W. H. Zhu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 9812–9825.
3 Q. Li and Z. Li, Adv. Sci., 2017, 4, 1600484.
4 J. Ochi, K. Tanaka and Y. Chujo, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2020, 59,
9841–9855.
5 S. Suzuki, S. Sasaki, A. S. Sairi, R. Iwai, B. Z. Tang and G. I. Konishi,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 9856–9867.
6 S. Xu, Y. Duan and B. Liu, Adv. Mater., 2020, 32, e1903530.
7 J. Yang, M. Fang and Z. Li, Aggregate, 2020, 1, 6–18.
8 X. Jin, M. B. Price, J. R. Finnegan, C. E. Boott, J. M. Richter, A. Rao,
S. M. Menke, R. H. Friend, G. R. Whittell and I. Manners, Science,
2018, 360, 897–900.
9 H. B. Liu, J. L. Xu, Y. J. Li and Y. L. Li, Acc. Chem. Res., 2010, 43, 1496–1508.
10 H. Shen, Y. Li and Y. Li, Aggregate, 2020, 1, 57–68.
Moreover, the fluorescence intensity of the block single crystal
F
of MesB-TCN was dramatically quenched when the block single
crystal was heated from 300 K to 420 K, as shown in Fig. 3d. Upon
cooling the block crystal back to 300 K, the fluorescence can be
recovered to the initial state, and this fluorescence switch cycle can
be repeated at least 5 times without obvious fatigue (see Fig. 3e).
Single crystal X-ray diffraction of the block crystal at 300 K and
400 K was conducted. From the result, an obvious change can be
found in the molecular structure as shown in Fig. S4 (ESI†), which
shows that the molecular structure at 300 K, including the main
bond lengths and other parameters, is close to the single crystal 11 D. Yan and D. G. Evans, Mater. Horiz., 2014, 1, 46–57.
12 W. Zhang, J. Yao and Y. S. Zhao, Acc. Chem. Res., 2016, 49, 1691–1700.
13 J. Mei, N. L. Leung, R. T. Kwok, J. W. Lam and B. Z. Tang, Chem. Rev.,
diffraction data at 180 K, but the molecular structure at 400 K
shows obvious deformation, which could affect the luminescence
2015, 115, 11718–11940.
behavior of the molecules. Besides, the intermolecular interactions 14 Z. Zhao, H. Zhang, J. W. Y. Lam and B. Z. Tang, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2020, 59, 9888–9907.
15 Y. Dong, J. W. Lam, A. Qin, Z. Li, J. Sun, H. H. Sung, I. D. Williams
are also influenced by the increment of temperature with the p–p
stacking distance changed from 3.296 Å and 3.377 Å at 300 K to
and B. Z. Tang, Chem. Commun., 2007, 40–42.
3.345 Å and 3.429 Å at 400 K, as shown in Fig. S5 (ESI†). Other 16 J. Tong, Y. J. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Z. Sun and B. Z. Tang, J. Phys. Chem.
C, 2015, 119, 21875–21881.
17 H. Naito, K. Nishino, Y. Morisaki, K. Tanaka and Y. Chujo,
interactions like NÁÁÁH–C between cyano groups and naphthalene
moieties also elongated from 2.649 Å at 300 K to 2.688 Å at 400 K.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 254–259.
All these data revealed a more loose molecular packing of the block 18 S. Yang, P. A. Yin, L. Li, Q. Peng, X. Gu, G. Gao, J. You and B. Z. Tang,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 10136–10142.
19 Y. Liu, A. Li, S. Xu, W. Xu, Y. Liu, W. Tian and B. Xu, Angew. Chem.,
crystal at high temperature, which could result in enhanced non-
radiative decay and quenching of fluorescence.
Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 15098–15103.
In this work, we reported a series of dicyanomethylene- 20 J. M. Wong, R. Zhang, P. Xie, L. Yang, M. Zhang, R. Zhou, R. Wang,
Y. Shen, B. Yang, H. B. Wang and Z. Ding, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2020, 59, 17461–17466.
21 T. K. Wood, W. E. Piers, B. A. Keay and M. Parvez, Angew. Chem., Int.
bridged triarylboranes. The introduction of the dicyanomethy-
lene group dramatically enhances the electron-deficient
character with low-lying LUMO energy levels (oÀ3.5 eV), while
Ed., 2009, 48, 4009–4012.
22 M. Mantina, A. C. Chamberlin, R. Valero, C. J. Cramer and
D. G. Truhlar, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2009, 113, 5806–5812.
23 Y. Xie, T. Zhang, Z. Li, Q. Peng, Y. Yi and Z. Shuai, Chem. – Asian J.,
2015, 10, 2154–2161.
24 T. Zhang, Q. Peng, C. Quan, H. Nie, Y. Niu, Y. Xie, Z. Zhao, B. Z. Tang
and Z. Shuai, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, 5573–5580.
25 X. Zheng, D. Wang, W. Xu, S. Cao, Q. Peng and B. Z. Tang, Mater.
Horiz., 2019, 6, 2016–2023.
26 X. Zheng, Q. Peng, L. Zhu, Y. Xie, X. Huang and Z. Shuai, Nanoscale,
2016, 8, 15173–15180.
27 Q. Peng, Y. Yi, Z. Shuai and J. S. Shao, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129,
9333–9339.
retaining good stability. Interestingly, one of these compounds,
FMesB-TCN, exhibits
a
crystallization-induced emission
enhancement property, with a much higher PLQY (ca. 33%)
of the block shape crystal than that of the solution, the
neat film, and an acicular crystal from the same compound
(ca. 1.3%). Single crystal X-ray diffraction indicated a much tighter
packing mode in the block crystal with strong p–p interactions,
which was not observed in the acicular crystal. DFT calculations
revealed a smaller reorganization energy of the block crystal than
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021
Chem. Commun., 2021, 57, 7926–7929 | 7929