pattern recorded from the batch sample is also displayed in Fig. 3,
and the peaks are assigned to diffraction from the {111}, {200},
{220}, {311}, and {222} planes of fcc gold, respectively. It is
worth noting that the ratio between the intensities of the {200} and
{111} diffraction peaks is much lower than the conventional value
(0.071 versus 0.53). The ratio between the intensities of the {220}
and {111} peaks is also much lower than the conventional value
(0.034 versus 0.33). These observations confirm that our nano-
plates are mainly dominated by {111} facets, and thus their {111}
planes tend to be preferentially oriented parallel to the surface of the
supporting substrate.
However, compared to aspartate, TEM of the lysine-prepared
gold particles shows spherical nanoparticles 6 ± 2 nm in diameter
(Fig. 4a). Similarly, that of the tryptophan-prepared gold particles
shows the presence of spherical nanoparticles 60 ± 5 nm in size with
high monodispersity (Fig. 4b). However, the size distribution of the
arginine-prepared nanoparticles is very wide with diameter 10 ± 5
nm (Fig. 4c). Examination of the tyrosine-prepared gold particles
reveals the presence of spherical and rod-shaped particles (Fig. 4d).
In these cases, the polycrystalline natures of the as-prepared
nanoparticles are revealed by electron diffraction patterns (Fig. 4,
insets). Based on these observations, aspartate may be specific for
binding to facets other than {111}. This specific interaction of the
amino acid with the crystal lattice structure may not only influence
the surface energies but also alter the distribution of surface
concentration of this species. The specific-binding amino acid also
served as reductant for gold(III) at the growing crystals. The
increase in the local concentration of the amino acid at the binding
facets should elevate the chemically reducing environment within
this local region and must bias accretion onto a face other than
{111} thus increasing the area of the {111} facet. Clearly, the
amino acid provides both recognition and reduction. But the facet-
specific recognition may lose at elevated temperature since under
boiling conditions tetrachloroaurate was reduced to yield spherical
gold nanoparticles in different sizes depending on the molar ratio of
aspartate to tetrachloroaurate and no other morphologies were
found.14 Nevertheless, amino acids other than aspartate show an
unspecific binding to gold facets. The fact that aspartate does show
such distinct shape control over the crystal growth reflects that
these biologically related small molecules also have a profound
influence on the gold crystal growth as macromolecules.11
In summary,
nanostructures has been described. Some size and shape controls
can be exercised by different amino acids. Among natural -amino
L
-amino acid-based one-pot synthesis of gold
L
acids, aspartate shows a very distinct capability of shape control to
produce gold nanoplates. Although not yet optimized for a certain
amino acid by altering the concentration ratio to fabricate other
special gold nanostructures, the experimental protocols herein
serve to emphasize the practical significance of certain amino acid
residues from biomacromolecules or organisms in biomimetic
construction of nanomaterials. This work provides a further insight
into understanding the contribution from these residues for the
natural process of biomineralization.
Fig. 3 XRD pattern of a batch sample synthesized by aspartate.
Financial support from Special Funds for Major State Basic
Research of China (2002CB713803) and National Natural Science
Foundation of China (No.29835120) is acknowledged.
Notes and references
1 C. M. Niemeyer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 4128 and references
therein; E. Bauerlein, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 614; L. Addadi,
S. Raz and S. Weiner, Adv. Mater., 2003, 15, 957.
2 P. Raveendran, J. Fu and S. L. Wallen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125,
13940.
3 M. Allen, D. Willits, J. Mosolf, M. Young and T. Douglas, Adv. Mater.,
2002, 14, 1562.
4 S. Dieluweit, D. Pum and U. B. Sleytr, Supramol. Sci., 1998, 5, 15.
5 T. Douglas, E. Strable, D. Willits, A. Aitouchen, M. Libera and M.
Young, Adv. Mater., 2002, 14, 415.
6 T. Douglas and M. Young, Adv. Mater., 1999, 11, 679.
7 J. N. Cha, G. D. Stucky, D. E. Morse and T. J. Deming, Nature, 2000,
403, 289; S. W. Lee, C. B. Mao, C. E. Flynn and A. M. Belcher, Science,
2002, 296, 892.
8 T. Klaus, R. Joerger, E. Olsson and C. G. Granqvist, Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, 1999, 96, 13611.
9 R. R. Naik, S. J. Stringer, G. Agarwal, S. E. Jones and M. O. Stone,
Nature Mater., 2002, 1, 169.
10 M. Kowshik, S. Ashtaputre, S. Kharrazi, W. Vogel, J. Urban, S. K.
Kulkarni and K. M. Paknikar, Nanotechnology, 2003, 14, 95.
11 S. Brown, M. Sarikaya and E. Johnson, J. Mol. Biol., 2000, 299, 725.
12 D. B. Williams and C. B. Carter, Transmission electron microscopy,
Plenum Press, London and New York, 1996.
13 Y. Sun, B. Mayers and Y. Xia, Nano Lett., 2003, 3, 675.
14 S. Mandal, P. R. Selvakannan, S. Phadtare, R. Pasricha and M. Sastry,
Proc. India Acad. Sci. (Chem. Sci.), 2002, 114, 513.
Fig. 4 TEM images of the gold nanoparticles synthesized by lysine (a),
tryptophan (b), arginine (c), and tyrosine (d). The scale bars are 5 nm (a), 50
nm (b), 20 nm (c), and 100 nm (d), respectively. The insets show their
selected-area-electron-diffraction patterns, respectively.
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 1 1 0 4 – 1 1 0 5
1105